본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

言官 徐觀瀾의 임진전쟁

Speaking official Xu Quanlan speaks the Imjin war

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper aims to unearth the facts surrounding the end of the Imjin War by reexamining the activities of Xu Quanlan (徐觀瀾), the first Supervising Secretary (給事中) to be sent to Joseon. Emperor Wanli (萬曆帝) ordered Xu Quanlan to investigate the results in the battle of Ulsan (蔚山) and the forging of the reports by the Ming generals. Accompanied by Censor Chen Xiao (陳效) and Ding Yingtai (丁應泰), who initially impeached the Ming generals, Xu Quanlan started the investigation in Joseon. Ding Yingtai also accused Joseon of betraying the Ming by secretly siding with Japan. Xu’s first work was to clear the false accusation towards Joseon. Doing so, he earned favorable public opinion of the Joseon society. In the middle of their inspection, the Japanese forces suddenly retreated to Japan and the war ended. The investigators, having witnessed the situation, testified that the Ming generals’ claim of victory was completely fabricated. Not only had the Ming army lost the engagement with the enemy, the generals secretly negotiated for the termination of the war. The commands of the Ming army provided hostages and supplies for the bloodless retreat of the Japanese troops and further promised to aid the establishment of diplomatic relations between Ming and Japan. In an attempt to cover up the investigators’ claims, the supreme commander Xing Jie (邢玠) impeached the inspectors for slandering the Ming army. Censor Chen Xiao suddenly passed away just prior to submitting the reports. Despite all the questionable circumstances, the emperor declared victory in the Imjin war without further investigation. In contrast to the official stance, various history records of the contemporary time testify the validity of Xu Quanlan’s reports. Mingshi (明史), the official history of Ming, also disputes the victory of the Ming army. It could be said that the words of the speaking officials served as the last line of defense against the distortion of facts.

Abstract

This paper aims to unearth the facts surrounding the end of the Imjin War by reexamining the activities of Xu Quanlan (徐觀瀾), the first Supervising Secretary (給事中) to be sent to Joseon. Emperor Wanli (萬曆帝) ordered Xu Quanlan to investigate the results in the battle of Ulsan (蔚山) and the forging of the reports by the Ming generals. Accompanied by Censor Chen Xiao (陳效) and Ding Yingtai (丁應泰), who initially impeached the Ming generals, Xu Quanlan started the investigation in Joseon. Ding Yingtai also accused Joseon of betraying the Ming by secretly siding with Japan. Xu’s first work was to clear the false accusation towards Joseon. Doing so, he earned favorable public opinion of the Joseon society. In the middle of their inspection, the Japanese forces suddenly retreated to Japan and the war ended. The investigators, having witnessed the situation, testified that the Ming generals’ claim of victory was completely fabricated. Not only had the Ming army lost the engagement with the enemy, the generals secretly negotiated for the termination of the war. The commands of the Ming army provided hostages and supplies for the bloodless retreat of the Japanese troops and further promised to aid the establishment of diplomatic relations between Ming and Japan. In an attempt to cover up the investigators’ claims, the supreme commander Xing Jie (邢玠) impeached the inspectors for slandering the Ming army. Censor Chen Xiao suddenly passed away just prior to submitting the reports. Despite all the questionable circumstances, the emperor declared victory in the Imjin war without further investigation. In contrast to the official stance, various history records of the contemporary time testify the validity of Xu Quanlan’s reports. Mingshi (明史), the official history of Ming, also disputes the victory of the Ming army. It could be said that the words of the speaking officials served as the last line of defense against the distortion of facts.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 雍正, "澤州府志" (2001), 山西古籍出版社
  2. 方孔炤, "全邊略記, 明代蒙古漢籍史料彙編, 第3輯" (2006)
  3. 許重熙, "嘉靖以來注略, 四庫禁燬書叢刊, 史部005冊", ~
  4. 沈德符, "萬曆野獲編" (1980), 中華書局
  5. 谷應泰, "明史紀事本末" (1977), 中華書局
  6. 吴道行, "熙朝奏議", 美國會圖書館, ~
  7. 趙慶男, "亂中雜錄" (1971), 민족문화추진회
  8. 申欽, "象村先生集, 한국역대문집총서 No. 126-130", ~
  9. 佚名, "宋經略書, 奎章閣所藏本", ~
  10. 孫起陽, "聱漢集, 한국문집총간(속) 제11집", 한국고전번역원, ~ (1825)
  11. 邢玠, "經略御倭奏議, 御倭史料匯編" (2004), 全國圖書館 文獻縮微複製中心
  12. 趙園, "증오의 시대-명청 교체기 사대부 연구1" (2017), 글항아리
  13. 樊樹志, "重寫晚明史:新政與盛世" (2018), 中華書局
  14. 李啟煌, "文禄. ・慶長の役と東アジア" (1997), 臨川書店
  15. 의丁酉再亂 史料 考察, "중국사연구", 2018, 35~62, pp.중국사학회, http:
  16. 정억기, "白沙 李恒福의 외교 활동", 한국인물사연구, (8), pp.47~72 (2007), (사)한국인물사연구회
  17. 차혜원, "조선에 온 중국 첩보원 ―임진왜란기 동아시아의 정보전과 조선", 역사비평, (85), pp.332~359 (2008), 역사문제연구소
  18. 차혜원, "중국 복건지역의 임진전쟁(1592~1598) 대응", 동방학지, (174), pp.137~162 (2016), 국학연구원[DOI]
  19. 허지은, "丁應泰의朝鮮誣告事件을 통해 본 조명관계", 사학연구, (76), pp.169~205 (2004), 한국사학회
  20. 李光濤, "「丁應泰與楊鎬」-朝鮮壬辰倭禍論叢之一, 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊", 歷史學硏究, 53(1) (1982)
  21. 刘宝全, "明晚期中国和朝鲜的相互认识——以丁应泰和李廷龟的辩论为中心", 韩国学论文集, 19 (2011), 北京大学韩国研究中心
  22. 杨海英, "毛国科使日考——兼谈万历援朝东征后期的和议问题", 明史研究论丛, (2) (2014), 中国社会科学院历史研究所
  23. 吳如功, "壬辰戰爭陳璘“擊殺石曼子”事迹及其傳播考辨", 陝西學前師範學院學報, 32(12) (2016), 陝西學前師範學院
  24. 孫卫国, "代中朝关系丁应泰弹劾事件与明清史籍之建构", 南开学报, (3) (2012)
  25. 丸􊛇金作, "朝鮮宣祖期における明丁應泰誣奏事件について 8,9,10", 歷史學硏究, 8,9,10 (1938)
  26. 渡辺美季, "鳥原宗安の明人送還-徳川家康による対明「初」交渉の実態-", ヒストリア, 202 (2006)
  27. 久芳崇, "山根幸夫敎授追悼記念論叢" (2007), 汲古書院
  28. 鈴木開, "丁應泰の變と朝鮮--丁酉倭亂期における朝明關係の一局面", 朝鮮學報, 219 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)