천총 8-9년 후금의 동해여진 원정과 홍타이지의 팔기 개혁
Hong Taiji's Reform of the Manchu Banner System and Military Campaigns on the Donghai Jurchen, 1634-1635
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the relation between the Manchu state’s military campaigns against the Donghai Jurchen (東海女眞) and the development of the Eight Banner system. Previous research studies on the Donghai campaigns focus on individual events or specific areas, but little has been written about the general characteristics of the campaigns. The main purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Manchu state’s Donghai campaigns; furthermore, through this analysis, clarify their relevance to the renovation of the banner system, especially the system promoted by Hong Taiji during the later years of the Tiancong (天聰) era. Based on Manchu records, there were a total of 15 military campaigns into Donghai regions during Hong Taiji’s reign. More specifically, 10 out of 15 campaigns had no other major mission other than bringing over the local population. The banner army had a target population size to recruit, which was carefully set up in advance. As the result of the campaigns, up to thirty thousand Donghai people, in which at least one third were adult males, migrated to the Manchu state and were immediately integrated into the banner companies. The largest Donghai campaign took place during the 8-9th years of the Tiancong Era, and was closely related to the overall renovation of the banner system. On the 21st day of the 9th month of the 8th year of the Tiancong Era (1634), Hong Taiji proposed a new policy regarding the distribution of the newly-submitted Donghai population, saying that instead of evenly dividing the population among all eight banners, top priority must be given to the banners that had fewer companies. By doing so, Hong Taiji not only attempted to even out the number of companies across all eight banners, but also aimed to extensively reinforce the banner system. Large new populations were necessary to enforce this new policy, which served as a form of momentum to launch a series of Donghai campaigns on an unprecedented scale later that year. According to the record of Neiguoshiyuandang, 18 companies were established as a result of this new policy. Though the exact date of their formation is uncertain, considering the method proposed by Hong Taiji, it is likely that they were created not long after the decision was made. In fact, there are a few pieces of evidence supporting this assumption. Around the time when the massive expeditionary force departed for the Donghai regions, 59 people were granted special privileges which exempted their companies from various taxes. At the same time, some were provided with additional Donghai population to further expand their existing company, or even to create a new one. This process was completed before the army returned from the campaign, which makes it a perfect example of the ‘create a company first, staff it later’ policy of Hong Taiji’s new plan. Since Donghai campaigns were fully planned operations, it was possible to plan distribution of soon-to-be-submitted populations in advance. In conclusion, the Donghai campaigns during the later years of the Tiancong Era were not isolated activities, but an important part of the overall reform project of the banner system. It must be noted that while it was true that there was a general consensus on the need to reform the banner system at the time, Hong Taiji took the opportunity to use it for his own advantage. In this sense, the Donghai campaigns during the later years of the Tiancong Era can be considered one of the first steps in the process of shoring up Hong Taiji’s political position and transforming the state, which began after the death of Ligdan Khan and the submission of the Chahar Mongols, and would eventually lead to the proclamation of ‘Daicing gurun (大淸)’, the Qing.
Abstract
This article examines the relation between the Manchu state’s military campaigns against the Donghai Jurchen (東海女眞) and the development of the Eight Banner system. Previous research studies on the Donghai campaigns focus on individual events or specific areas, but little has been written about the general characteristics of the campaigns. The main purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Manchu state’s Donghai campaigns; furthermore, through this analysis, clarify their relevance to the renovation of the banner system, especially the system promoted by Hong Taiji during the later years of the Tiancong (天聰) era. Based on Manchu records, there were a total of 15 military campaigns into Donghai regions during Hong Taiji’s reign. More specifically, 10 out of 15 campaigns had no other major mission other than bringing over the local population. The banner army had a target population size to recruit, which was carefully set up in advance. As the result of the campaigns, up to thirty thousand Donghai people, in which at least one third were adult males, migrated to the Manchu state and were immediately integrated into the banner companies. The largest Donghai campaign took place during the 8-9th years of the Tiancong Era, and was closely related to the overall renovation of the banner system. On the 21st day of the 9th month of the 8th year of the Tiancong Era (1634), Hong Taiji proposed a new policy regarding the distribution of the newly-submitted Donghai population, saying that instead of evenly dividing the population among all eight banners, top priority must be given to the banners that had fewer companies. By doing so, Hong Taiji not only attempted to even out the number of companies across all eight banners, but also aimed to extensively reinforce the banner system. Large new populations were necessary to enforce this new policy, which served as a form of momentum to launch a series of Donghai campaigns on an unprecedented scale later that year. According to the record of Neiguoshiyuandang, 18 companies were established as a result of this new policy. Though the exact date of their formation is uncertain, considering the method proposed by Hong Taiji, it is likely that they were created not long after the decision was made. In fact, there are a few pieces of evidence supporting this assumption. Around the time when the massive expeditionary force departed for the Donghai regions, 59 people were granted special privileges which exempted their companies from various taxes. At the same time, some were provided with additional Donghai population to further expand their existing company, or even to create a new one. This process was completed before the army returned from the campaign, which makes it a perfect example of the ‘create a company first, staff it later’ policy of Hong Taiji’s new plan. Since Donghai campaigns were fully planned operations, it was possible to plan distribution of soon-to-be-submitted populations in advance. In conclusion, the Donghai campaigns during the later years of the Tiancong Era were not isolated activities, but an important part of the overall reform project of the banner system. It must be noted that while it was true that there was a general consensus on the need to reform the banner system at the time, Hong Taiji took the opportunity to use it for his own advantage. In this sense, the Donghai campaigns during the later years of the Tiancong Era can be considered one of the first steps in the process of shoring up Hong Taiji’s political position and transforming the state, which began after the death of Ligdan Khan and the submission of the Chahar Mongols, and would eventually lead to the proclamation of ‘Daicing gurun (大淸)’, the Qing.
참고문헌 (71)
- 東洋文庫淸代史硏究室, "舊滿洲檔: 天聰九年 (1・2)" (1972), 東洋文庫
- 東洋文庫淸朝滿州語檔案史料の總合的硏究チーム, "內國史院檔: 天聰五年 (1・2)" (2011), 東洋文庫東北アジア硏究班
- 東洋文庫淸代史硏究室, "內國史院檔: 天聰七年" (2003), 東洋文庫淸代史硏究委員會
- 東洋文庫淸朝滿州語檔案史料の總合的硏究チーム, "內國史院檔: 天聰八年" (2009), 東洋文庫東北アジア硏究班
- 河內良弘, "(中國第一歷史檔案館藏)內國史院滿文檔案譯註(崇德二・三年分)" (2010), 松香堂書店
- 滿文老檔硏究會, "滿文老檔 Ⅰ-Ⅶ" (1955), 東洋文庫
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 만주학센터 만문노당역주회, "만주실록역주" (2014), 소명출판사
- "仁祖實錄 (『朝鮮王朝實錄』)", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸初內國史院滿文檔案譯編 (上・中・下)" (1989), 光明日報出版社
- "淸太宗實錄, 乾隆 三修本" (1985), 中華書局
- "淸太宗實錄, 康熙 重修本"[URL]
- "淸世祖實錄" (1985), 中華書局
- 遼寧省圖書館古籍部, "八旗滿洲氏族通譜" (1989), 遼瀋書社
- 鄂爾泰, "八旗通志初集" (1985), 東北師範大學出版社
- 李洵, "欽定八旗通志" (2002), 吉林文史出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸代檔案史料叢編, 第14輯" (1990), 中華出版
- 이 훈, "만주족 이야기" (2018), 너머북스
- 杜家骥, "淸代八旗官制與行政" (2015), 中國社會科學出版社
- 杜家驥, "八旗與淸朝政治論稿" (2008), 人民出版社
- 劉小萌, "여진 부락에서 만주 국가로" (2013), 푸른역사
- 張晉藩, "淸入關前國家法律制度史" (1988), 遼寧人民出版社
- 谷井陽子, "八旗制度の研究" (2015), 京都大學學術出版會
- 松浦茂, "淸朝のアムール政策と少數民族" (2006), 京都大學學術出版會
- Mark C. Elliott, "만주족의 청제국" (2009), 푸른역사
- 김선민, "훈춘, 청과 조선의 변경", 만주연구, (19), pp.184~222 (2015), 만주학회[DOI]
- 조병학, "후금(淸)의 흑룡강 주변 部族에 대한 平定 과정 및 복속 정책", 몽골학, (17), pp.143~170 (2004), 한국몽골학회
- 남의현, "16~17세기 豆滿江 邊境地帶 女眞의 성장과 국제질서의 변화― 瓦爾喀 등 女眞族 통합과정을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (41), pp.67~106 (2014), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 박정민, "누르하치의 두만강 유역 진출과 조선의 藩胡 상실", 인문과학연구, (43), pp.179~206 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- 송인주, "淸初의 黑龍江 流域 支配體制 確立過程", 석사, pp.2016
- 유지원, "淸代前期 東北의 邊城 寧古塔 : 建置過程 및 住民生活의 변화를 중심으로", 명청사연구, 10 (1999)
- 이훈, "1635년 후금의 와르카 공략", 동양사학연구, (142), pp.71~120 (2018), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 장정수, "선조대 말 여진 번호 로툰(老土)의 건주여진 귀부와 조선의 대응", 조선시대사학보, (78), pp.7~49 (2016), 조선시대사학회
- 조병학, "後金의 東海諸部 平定 과정 및 복속 정책", 중앙사론, 17 (2003)
- 한성주, "누르하치의 두만강 유역 번호 침탈과 조선의 대응 고찰", 만주연구, (22), pp.127~163 (2016), 만주학회[DOI]
- 郭成康, "淸初牛錄的類別", 史學集刊 (1985)
- 那暁波, "論淸入關前対黒龍江流域各族実行的和親政策", 黒龍江民族叢刊 (1986)
- 那暁波, "試論淸入關前対黒龍江流域各族的政策", 黒龍江民族叢刊 (1987)
- 董萬侖, "淸初瓦爾喀部安楚拉庫, 內河二路考異--三家子屯"他塔喇氏家譜"剖析", 黑龍江文物叢刊 (1983)
- 董萬侖, "淸代庫雅喇滿洲研究", 民族硏究 (1987)
- 董萬侖, "明末淸初豆滿江內外瓦爾喀硏究", 民族硏究 (2003)
- 呂光天, "論黒龍江流域上, 中游各族與明淸兩朝的隸屬關係", 社會科學戦線 (1981)
- 傅克東, "八旗建立前滿洲牛錄和人口初探", 中央民族學院學報 (1981)
- 傅克東, "淸代前期的佐領", 社會科學戰線 (1982)
- 傅克東, "淸初滿洲牛錄的特徵", 社會科學輯刊 (1982)
- 安雙成, "淸初編審八旗男丁滿文檔案選譯", 歷史檔案 (1988)
- 王景澤, "「野人女眞」與努爾哈赤的興起", 黑龍江民族叢刊 (1997)
- 劉景憲, "淸太宗時期的“新滿洲”問題", 歷史檔案 (1981)
- 劉小萌, "關於淸代「新滿洲」的幾個問題", 滿族研究 (1987)
- 李明澤, "明末建州, 烏拉間的圖們江瓦爾喀之爭--兼論東北亞秩序的變遷", 渤海大學學報 (2017)
- 任玉雪, "八旗牛彔起源時間問題再探", 滿族研究 (2004)
- 蔣秀松, "淸初的呼爾哈部", 社會科學戰線 (1981)
- 周生美, "試論淸入關前後金對瓦爾喀部的征服", 才智 (2016)
- 周喜峰, "明代末期黑龍江地區土著民族探析", 東北史地 (2008)
- 周喜峰, "黑龍江流域各族對滿族形成的影響", 滿語研究 (2009)
- 韓狄, "八旗滿洲"國初"東海女眞佐領補正", 北京聯合大學學報 (2007)
- 今西春秋, "Ningguta考", 朝鮮学報, 21・22 (1961)
- 今西春秋, "Jušen国域考", 東方學紀要, 2 (1967)
- 吉田金一, "17世紀中ごろの黑龍江流域の原住民について", 史學雑誌, 82(9) (1973)
- 三田村泰助, "淸の太宗の即位事情とその君主權確立", 東洋史研究, 6(2) (1941)
- 三田村泰助, "明末淸初の滿洲氏族とその源流", 東洋史研究, 19(2) (1960)
- 松浦茂, "ヌルハチ(淸・太祖)の徙民政策", 東洋學報, 67(3・4) (1986)
- 松浦茂, "淸朝辺民制度の成立", 史林, 70(4) (1987)
- 松浦茂, "17世紀アム-ル川中流地方住民の経済活動", 東方學, 95 (1998)
- 松浦茂, "淸朝のアムール地方統治 : 淸朝が貂皮の徴収に派遣した旗人", 京都大學総合人間學部紀要, 6 (1999)
- 佐佐木史郎, "アム-ル川下流域諸民族の社會・文化における淸朝支配の影響について", 國立民族學博物館研究報告, 14(3) (1989)
- 田中克己, "明末の野人女直について", 東洋學報, 42(2) (1959)
- 增井寬也, "新滿洲ニル編成前後の東海ワルカ部--特に種族問題を中心として", 立命館文學, 496-498 (1986)
- 增井寬也, "明代の野人女直と海西女直, 上・下", 大垣女子短期大學研究纪要, 37-38 (1996)
- 增井寬也, "明末のワルカ部女直とその集團構造について", 立命館文學, 562 (1999)
- 增井寬也, "専管権から見たアイシン國の功臣集團とその構成", 立命館文學, 594 (2006)
- 增井寬也, "淸初ニル類別考", 立命館文學, 608 (2008)
