清中期 滿洲人의 일상 속 族長의 역할
A role of clan leader in Manchus daily life in the Middle Qing Dynasty
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There was the clan leader who represented each clan in the niru, a basic social unit of the Eight Banners in the Qing Period. The precedent research onthe role of the Manchus clan leader mainly covered the roles related to the clan leader’s clan activities, such as supervision of the ancestral rites, management of kinsmen’s property, compilation of the genealogy, an adoptive son issue within the clan. They described that the Manchus were also formed based on a similar index of the clan formation to the Han people who appeared in the Manchus clan. Manchus were a bannerman who all belonged to Eight Banners, and various standards of Eight Banners greatly affected the large part of their daily life. In this regard, the formation of the Manchus clan and the role of the clan leader were also affected by Eight Banners. However, it is not easy to find an attempt to examine the contact point with Eight Banners other than an effort to find out a contact point with the Han people clan. The reason is to explain the index of the clan formation as a phenomenon of Manchus’ assimilating into Han people. This paper focused on the relation between the head of the Manchus clan who was the top leadership of the clan and Eight Banners and researched the position of the head of the Manchus clan in niru and the role of the clan leader in the daily life of bannerman. Unlike the head of the Han people clan, the Manchus clan leader complied with Qing regulations and selected those with high official positions within the clan. There is a reason why Qing did not weigh on selecting a formal government official but the clan leader; it is because the clan leader took the role of managing and supervising Manchu’s daily life on the front lines. Qing sovereign tried to edify Manchus through imperial edict and directives in order for Manchus to maintain the ruling group’s dignity. Because an emperor’s order was delivered to the bannerman by the clan leader, the clan leader was justified to control kinsmen based on imperial edict and directive. In addition, the clan leader specified kinsmen’s daily life control and authority of punishment granted by an emperor in the family regulation, so that he emphasized the authority of managing kinsmen. It is the Manchus clan’s characteristic that specified the authority of the clan leader in the clan’s lessons. It was because the clan leader was the subject who was the most severely punished after offenders.
Abstract
There was the clan leader who represented each clan in the niru, a basic social unit of the Eight Banners in the Qing Period. The precedent research onthe role of the Manchus clan leader mainly covered the roles related to the clan leader’s clan activities, such as supervision of the ancestral rites, management of kinsmen’s property, compilation of the genealogy, an adoptive son issue within the clan. They described that the Manchus were also formed based on a similar index of the clan formation to the Han people who appeared in the Manchus clan. Manchus were a bannerman who all belonged to Eight Banners, and various standards of Eight Banners greatly affected the large part of their daily life. In this regard, the formation of the Manchus clan and the role of the clan leader were also affected by Eight Banners. However, it is not easy to find an attempt to examine the contact point with Eight Banners other than an effort to find out a contact point with the Han people clan. The reason is to explain the index of the clan formation as a phenomenon of Manchus’ assimilating into Han people. This paper focused on the relation between the head of the Manchus clan who was the top leadership of the clan and Eight Banners and researched the position of the head of the Manchus clan in niru and the role of the clan leader in the daily life of bannerman. Unlike the head of the Han people clan, the Manchus clan leader complied with Qing regulations and selected those with high official positions within the clan. There is a reason why Qing did not weigh on selecting a formal government official but the clan leader; it is because the clan leader took the role of managing and supervising Manchu’s daily life on the front lines. Qing sovereign tried to edify Manchus through imperial edict and directives in order for Manchus to maintain the ruling group’s dignity. Because an emperor’s order was delivered to the bannerman by the clan leader, the clan leader was justified to control kinsmen based on imperial edict and directive. In addition, the clan leader specified kinsmen’s daily life control and authority of punishment granted by an emperor in the family regulation, so that he emphasized the authority of managing kinsmen. It is the Manchus clan’s characteristic that specified the authority of the clan leader in the clan’s lessons. It was because the clan leader was the subject who was the most severely punished after offenders.
참고문헌 (34)
- "清聖祖實錄", ~
- "清高宗實錄", ~
- "清仁宗实录", ~
- "(嘉慶) 欽定大清會典事例", ~
- "(乾隆) 欽定大清會典則例", ~
- "滿漢合璧八旗箴", 中央民族大學圖書館藏, 道光十二年(1832)刻本, ~ (1832)
- 何曉芳, "清代满族家谱選輯, 上下・冊" (2016), 遼寧民族出版社
- "奏將寧古塔紮爾賽所管世管佐領根由造具家譜呈覽折, 寧古塔將軍吉黨阿", 乾隆6年(1741)6月19日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:03-0175-1556-011(039-3241), ~
- "奏報寧古塔正紅旗佐領通貝家譜折, 寧古塔將軍吉黨阿", 乾隆五年(1740)三月初七日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:03-0171-0224-004, ~
- "「奏交宗人府揀選宗室覺羅之族長折」, 鑲黃旗滿洲副都統佛保", 雍正12年5月19日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:03-0170-0014-003, ~
- "無題,滿洲鑲黃旗副都統 吳禮", 雍正十二年(1734)8月20日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:04-02-002-000179-0005, ~
- "無題, 戶部侍郎覺羅塞得, 雍正朝", 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:04-02-002-000194-0047, ~
- "無題, 慶桂等", 乾隆五十三年(1788)7月28日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:04-02-001-000553-0012, ~
- "無題, 戶部給事中兼護軍統領巴圖", 雍正七年(1729)9月11日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:04-02-002-000155-0055, ~
- "「奏為過繼事請將族長護軍校紅帶子紮郎阿等交刑部審辦事」, 管理鑲藍旗滿洲都統事務多羅定郡王載銓", 道光十七年(1837)4月27日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:03-3782-032, ~
- "無題, 和碩裕親王保泰", 雍正元年(1723)七月二十六日, 中國第一歷史檔案館, 檔號:04-02-002-000090-0021, ~
- 杜家驥, "清代八旗官制與行政" (2015), 中國社會科學出版社
- 杜家驥, "清代滿族與八旗的關系及民族融合問題", 社會科學戰線, 6 (2016)
- 郭孟秀, "試論滿族共同體形成初期的文化多元成分", 滿族研究, 2 (2010)
- 遼寧省編輯委員會, "滿族社會歷史調查" (2009), 民族出版社
- 謝肇華, "從一份“家訓”看清後期滿族的族長制", 滿族研究, 1 (1993)
- 何海龍, "清代滿族民間宗法制度基本形態淺析", 滿族研究, 4 (2002)
- 馮爾康, "清代宗族族長述論", 江海學刊, 5 (2008)
- 馮爾康, "清代宗族的社會屬性—反思20世紀的宗族社會批判論", 安徽史學, 2 (2012)
- 馮爾康, "中國古代的宗族和祠堂" (2013), 商務印書館
- 陳瑞, "清代徽州族長的權力簡論", 安徽史學, 4 (2008)
- 徐雪梅, "清朝八旗制度中的族長", 人民論壇, 2 (2018)
- 張佳生, "八旗牛錄建制與滿洲之民族整合", 瀋陽故宮博物院院刊, 10 (2010)
- 張傑, "清代東北邊疆的滿族(1644-1840)" (2013), 遼寧民族出版社
- 孫靜, "滿族形成的再思考——清中期滿洲認同意思研究", 博士, pp.2005
- 徐凱, "滿洲認同“法典”與部族雙重構建:十六世紀以來滿洲民族的歷史嬗變" (2015), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王鐘翰, "關於滿族形成中的幾個問題", 社會科學戰線, 1 (1987)
- Mark C.Elliott, "만주족의 청제국(The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and EthnicIdentitiy in Late Imperial China)" (2009), 푸른역사
- Pamel K.Crossley, "孤軍:滿人一家三代與清帝國的終結(Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generatins and the End of the Qing World. New Jersey)" (2016), 人民出版社
