淸初 『明史』 「曆志」의 편찬과 梅文鼎의 律, 曆, ‘天文’ 해석
A New Understanding of Lü(律), Li(曆) and Tianwen(天文) by Mei Wen Ding(梅文鼎) and Lizhi(曆志) of Ming History(明史) project during the Early Qing(淸) period
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order for Lizhi writing, the part of Ming History Han literati had to understand “Old Principle” more clearly than “New Principle” which was for calendar making based on Western learning because Ming history project was for a compilation of last emperor history, not for recent works such as the calendar reform and yearly calendar making. Han literati firstly discussed on what problems related to calendar works under their last Ming bureaucracy were. Meanwhile they can build on the basic plans for Lizhi writing. Especially Mei Wen Ding who was one of Lizhi members suggested the new ways to understand Li, LüLi and Tianwen during the discuss on four kinds of Lifa of Late Ming with Han literati who had no basic learning of Li. LüLi should be divided for two because each has different meaning and works. Li and Tianwen should not be understood as the same because each work is totally different. Tianwen should accept “New principle” and reflect “Old principle” because both all plays essential roles for Li. Therefore Mei Wen Ding can suggest the ways to solve the problems originated from the Ming calendar works: Firstly to think Lili and Lishu together. Secondly no more astrology with to study Li as well as to know importance of masters on LiSuan learning. Lastly no more mantic comprehension with events on sky and to know importance of Suan learning.
Abstract
In order for Lizhi writing, the part of Ming History Han literati had to understand “Old Principle” more clearly than “New Principle” which was for calendar making based on Western learning because Ming history project was for a compilation of last emperor history, not for recent works such as the calendar reform and yearly calendar making. Han literati firstly discussed on what problems related to calendar works under their last Ming bureaucracy were. Meanwhile they can build on the basic plans for Lizhi writing. Especially Mei Wen Ding who was one of Lizhi members suggested the new ways to understand Li, LüLi and Tianwen during the discuss on four kinds of Lifa of Late Ming with Han literati who had no basic learning of Li. LüLi should be divided for two because each has different meaning and works. Li and Tianwen should not be understood as the same because each work is totally different. Tianwen should accept “New principle” and reflect “Old principle” because both all plays essential roles for Li. Therefore Mei Wen Ding can suggest the ways to solve the problems originated from the Ming calendar works: Firstly to think Lili and Lishu together. Secondly no more astrology with to study Li as well as to know importance of masters on LiSuan learning. Lastly no more mantic comprehension with events on sky and to know importance of Suan learning.
참고문헌 (50)
- "宋史" (1977), 中華書局
- "元史" (1976), 中華書局
- "明史" (1974), 中華書局
- "淸史稿" (1977), 中華書局
- 阮元, "疇人傳彙編" (2008), 廣陵書社
- 徐世昌, "淸儒學案" (2008), 中華書局
- 朱載堉, "律曆融通校注" (2006), 中國文聯出版社
- 黃宗羲, "黃梨洲文集" (2011), 中华书局
- 黃虞稷, "千頃堂書目" (1990), 上海古籍出版社
- 施閏章, "施愚山集" (2018), 黃山書社
- 王錫闡, "曉庵先生時文集" (2010), 上海古籍出版社
- 梅文鼎, "勿菴曆算書目" (2014), 湖南科学技术出版社
- 梅文鼎, "績學堂詩文抄" (2014), 黄山书社
- 梅文鼎, "曆學答問, 曆算全書, 文淵閣四庫全書", ~
- 閔斗基, "中國近代史硏究-紳士層의 思想과 行動" (1973), 一潮閣
- 金永植, "주자의 자연철학" (2005), 예문서원
- 小野和子, "明季党社考: 東林党と復社" (1996), 同朋舎出版
- 小野和子, "明末清初の社會と文化" (1996), 京都大學人文科學研究所
- 小野和子, "明清時代の政治と社会" (1983), 京都大学人文科学研究所
- 山田慶兒, "混沌の海へ : 中國的思考の構造" (1982), 朝日新聞社
- 山田慶兒, "朱子の自然学" (1978), 岩波書店
- 尙小明, "學人游幕與淸代學術" (2018), 東方出版社
- 王卓华, "康熙博学鸿儒著述考" (2017), 广西师范大学出版社
- 朱端强, "万斯同与《明史》修纂纪年 (中华文史新刊)" (2004), 中华书局
- 李 迪, "梅文鼎评传 (中国思想家评传丛书)" (2011), 南京大学出版社
- 余英时, "戴震与章学诚-清代中期学术思想史研究" (2000), 生活读书新知三联书店
- 葛兆光, "中国思想史 (全三册)" (2001), 复旦大学出版社
- 宋芝业, "會通與嬗變：明末清初東傳數學與中國數學及儒學"理"的觀念的演化" (2016), 上海古籍出版社
- 徐海松, "清初士人与西学" (2000), 东方出版社
- 張永堂, "明末淸初理學與科學關係再論" (1994), 臺灣學生
- Elman, Benjamin A, "From philosophy to philology : intellectual and social aspects of change in late Imperial China" (1990), Council on East Asian Studies
- Benjamin Elman, "On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900" (2004), Harvard University Press
- Henderson, John B, "The Development and decline of Chinese cosmology" (1984), Columbia University Press
- 안대옥, "중국 천문역법의 계보 —John B. Henderson, The Development and Decline of Chinese Cosmology, N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1984 (한국어역: <중국의 우주론과 청대의 과학혁명>)에 대한 서평—", 한글판<유교문화연구>, 1(17), pp.311~340 (2010), 유교문화연구소
- 안대옥, "淸代 前期 西學 受容의 형식과 외연", 중국사연구, (65), pp.143~179 (2010), 중국사학회
- 이미영, "淸初 徽州 ‘程朱闕里’ 文人들의 師友 관계와 考證禮學", 명청사연구, (37), pp.67~111 (2012), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 이미영, "淸朝 康熙 연간 曆算學을 통한 ‘西學’과 程朱學의 折衷", 서강인문논총, (59), pp.39~96 (2020), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 曺秉漢, "청대 중국의 실학과 고증학", 한국사시민강좌, 48 (2011), 일조각
- 조병한, "명말 청초 經史학파의 專制的 帝國체제 비판 ― 黃宗羲와 顧炎武를 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (36), pp.179~214 (2011), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 曺秉漢, "한중관계 2000년 동행과 공유의 역사" (2008), 소나무
- 曺秉漢, "章學誠 儒敎史學의 基本槪念과 그 政治的 意味-｢專家｣와 ｢史｣의 개념 分析을 중심으로-", 歷史學報, 103 (1984), 歷史學會
- 全海宗, "釋實學", 震檀學報, 19 (1958), 震檀學會
- 程钢, "《几何原本》对于明清学术思想的影响——徐光启与焦循的翻译与诠释", 九江学院学报(社会科学版), 36 (2017)
- 戴念祖, "“律历志”的由来——解密中国古代乐律与历法相关的缘由", 中国音乐学, 中国艺术研究院
- 戴念祖, "论乐律与历法,度量衡相和合的古代观念", 自然科学史研究, 32 (2013), 中国科学院
- 顾志兴, "试论浙东学术与浙东藏书关系", 浙江学刊 (2012), 浙江省社会科学院
- 王记录, "论清代史馆修史、幕府修史及私家修史的互动", 史学史研究 (2007), 北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所
- 林国标, "清初理学与西学的接触及西学对理学的影响", 船山学刊 (2004), 湖南省社会科学界联合会
- 秦晖, "新史学：多学科对话的图景, 上" (2003), 中国人民大学出版社
- 韩琦, "科史薪传: 庆祝杜石然先生从事科学史研究四十周年学术论文集" (1997), 辽宁教育出版社