17세기 초 몽골과 다이칭 구룬
Mongols and the Daicing gurun during the early 17th century
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the relation between the Manchu Daicing gurun and the Mongols during the early 17th century. Especially focused on the Manchu relationship with Chaqar, Qorcin and Khalkha Mongols of the Left Tumen, this article explained the origin of the Hong Taiji’s title Gosin onco hūwaliyasun enduringge han(宽温仁圣汗) and Daicing gurun(大淸國), the official name of the Manchu state. These official title and state name after 1636 had been related with Mongols, like as Chaqar above mentioned, which was to be conquered by the Manchu. On the first month of 1616, Nurhaci proclaimed his new title Genggiyen han which had been designed by Erdeni Bagshi. In the beginning of Manchu state, Beile had been used as the title of their political leader. For strengthening his political authority, Nurhaci made several relationship with Mongols, Qorcin and Khalkha Mongols of the Left Tumen. The Mongols in the early relationship with Manchus gave the han title to Nurhaci. On the year of 1619, Chaqar Ligden khan sent message to Nurhaci, in which remarked Nurhaci as the Genggiyen Kundulen han. It means Manchu had been recognized as one of leaders in the Inner Asian political realm established by Mongols. Hong taiji subjugated Chaqar Mongol and its political heritage arrived at Mukden, the center of Manchu government. Around the year of 1636, Hong taiji had been called Secen han same as Qubilai of Mongol Empire, and then had been granted the title Gosin onco hūwaliyasun enduringge han by the Mongols who enrolled into Manchu government. Through this procedure Manchu acquired an valuable political legitimacy from the Mongols. After received the title, Hong taiji proclaimed Daicing gurun, as the new name of Manchu state. Under the inner asian world order leaded by the Mongols, these are inevitable consequences that the Manchu accepted the mongolian political tradition and symbols.
Abstract
This article examines the relation between the Manchu Daicing gurun and the Mongols during the early 17th century. Especially focused on the Manchu relationship with Chaqar, Qorcin and Khalkha Mongols of the Left Tumen, this article explained the origin of the Hong Taiji’s title Gosin onco hūwaliyasun enduringge han(宽温仁圣汗) and Daicing gurun(大淸國), the official name of the Manchu state. These official title and state name after 1636 had been related with Mongols, like as Chaqar above mentioned, which was to be conquered by the Manchu. On the first month of 1616, Nurhaci proclaimed his new title Genggiyen han which had been designed by Erdeni Bagshi. In the beginning of Manchu state, Beile had been used as the title of their political leader. For strengthening his political authority, Nurhaci made several relationship with Mongols, Qorcin and Khalkha Mongols of the Left Tumen. The Mongols in the early relationship with Manchus gave the han title to Nurhaci. On the year of 1619, Chaqar Ligden khan sent message to Nurhaci, in which remarked Nurhaci as the Genggiyen Kundulen han. It means Manchu had been recognized as one of leaders in the Inner Asian political realm established by Mongols. Hong taiji subjugated Chaqar Mongol and its political heritage arrived at Mukden, the center of Manchu government. Around the year of 1636, Hong taiji had been called Secen han same as Qubilai of Mongol Empire, and then had been granted the title Gosin onco hūwaliyasun enduringge han by the Mongols who enrolled into Manchu government. Through this procedure Manchu acquired an valuable political legitimacy from the Mongols. After received the title, Hong taiji proclaimed Daicing gurun, as the new name of Manchu state. Under the inner asian world order leaded by the Mongols, these are inevitable consequences that the Manchu accepted the mongolian political tradition and symbols.
참고문헌 (47)
- "光海君日記 중초본", ~
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 만주학센터 민주실록 역주회, "滿洲實錄譯註" (2014), 소명출판
- 滿文老檔硏究會, "滿文老檔" (1955), 東洋文庫
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 만문노당역주회, "만문노당 역주 1~4권 太祖 太宗朝" (2017), 소명출판사
- 第一歷史檔案館, "淸初內國史院滿文檔案譯編 上" (1989), 光明日報出版社
- 楠木賢道, "內國史院滿文檔 : 天聰八年" (2009), 東洋文庫
- 李光濤, "明淸檔案存眞選輯" (1973), 臺灣中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
- 烏蘭, "「蒙古源流」硏究" (2000), 遼寧民族出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸初五世達賴喇嘛檔案史料選編" (2000), 中國藏學出版社
- 李保文, "Arban doloduγar jaγun-u emün-e qaγas-tu qolboγdaqu mongγol üsüg-ün bičig debter = 十七世纪蒙古文文书档案(1600-1650)" (1997), 內蒙古少年兒童出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸內秘書院蒙古文檔案匯編 Mongɤ ol dangsa ebkemel-ün emkidkel, 7冊" (2003), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸內閣蒙古堂檔 Dayičing gürün-ü dotoɤ adu yamun-u mongɤ ol bičig-ün ger-ün dangsa, 22冊" (2005), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 珠榮嘎, "阿勒坦汗傳" (1990), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 吉田順一, "「アルタン=ハ-ン伝」譯注" (1998), 風間書房
- Johan Elverskog, "The Jewel Translucent Sūtra: Altan Khan and the Mongols in the sixteenth century" (2003), Brill
- 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" (2012), 민음사
- 宫崎市定, "中國史" (1983), 역민사
- 마크 C. 엘리엇, "만주족의 청제국" (2009), 푸른역사
- 유소맹, "여진 부락에서 만주 국가로" (2013), 푸른역사
- 윤은숙, "몽골제국의 만주 지배사 : 옷치긴 왕가의 만주 경영과 이성계의 조선건국" (2010), 소나무
- 파멜라 크로슬리, "외국학계의 정복왕조 연구 시각과 최근 동향" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 杜家驥, "淸朝滿蒙聯姻硏究" (2003), 人民出版社
- 金成修, "明淸之際藏傳佛敎在蒙古地區的傳播" (2006), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 魏斐德(F. Wakeman), "洪業: 淸朝開國史" (1998), 江蘇人民出版社
- "百年淸史硏究史" (2021), 中國人民大學出版社
- 佐藤長, "中世チベット史硏究" (1986), 同朋社
- Berger, Patricia, "Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China" (2003), University of Hawai‘i Press
- Elliott, Mark C., "The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China" (2001), Stanford University Press
- Rawski, Evelyn S., "The Last Emporors : A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions" (1998), University of California Press
- 김성수, "活佛 轉世 제도와 근세 내륙아시아", 몽골학, (27), pp.1~30 (2009), 한국몽골학회[DOI]
- 김성수, "17世紀初 滿蒙 關係와 內陸 아시아 -만주-호르친・몽골 관계를 중심으로-", 중국사연구, (82), pp.61~92 (2013), 중국사학회
- 김성수, "몽골 제국 붕괴 이후 쿠빌라이계의 활동과 그 한계", 몽골학, (39), pp.29~63 (2014), 한국몽골학회[DOI]
- 김성수, "불교적 禮儀를 통해 본 17세기 내륙아시아", 명청사연구, (50), pp.89~127 (2018), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 김호동, "몽골제국과 ‘大元’", 역사학보, (192), pp.221~253 (2006), 역사학회
- 이선애, "홍타이지 시기 對蒙정책과 ‘外藩’ 개념의 형성", 동양사학회학술대회발표논문집 (2013)
- 鮑明, "淸朝國號詞源詞義試探", 內蒙古民族大學學報, 31(2) (2005)
- 蔡美彪, "大淸國建號前的國號族名與紀年", 歷史硏究, (3) (1987)
- 金啓孮, "自准部逃回被俘马兵蓝生芝口供──档案、《实录》、《东华录》关系之管窥", 內蒙古大學學報, (3) (1996)
- 李勤璞, "關于淸朝國號: 駁斥M.C. Elliott", 原道, (1) (2017)
- 李勤璞, "滿漢合壁『大金喇嘛法師寶記』譯注", 西部蒙古論壇, (4) (2019)
- 齊木德道爾吉, "關于康熙本“三朝實錄”", 內蒙古大學學報, (5) (2002)
- 齊木德道爾吉, "滿文蒙古文和漢文“淸太祖實錄”之間的關係", 內蒙古大學學報, (1) (2003)
- 松村潤, "大淸國號考", 社會科學輯刊, (1)통권 : 48 (1987)
- 石橋崇雄, "榎博士頌壽記念東洋史論叢" (1988), 汲古書院
- 石橋崇雄, "明淸時代史の 基本問題" (1997), 汲古書院
- Grupper, S. M., "Manchu Patronage and Tibetan Buddhism during the first half of the Ch’ing Dynasty", The Journal of the Tibet Society, 4 (1984)
- Waley-Cohen, Joanna, "The New Qing History", Radical History Review, 88 (2004)
