명 후기 소설 속 종족 이야기와 종족 인식 ― 『雲門傳』과 『醒世恒言・李道人獨步雲門』을 중심으로 ―
The Clan Stories and Clan Idea in Late Ming Dynasty Novels — Focusing on the Yunmen Zhuan(雲門傳) and Xingshihengyan(醒世恒言) ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen(李道人獨步雲門)’ —
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Clan stories and Clan idea contained in the Yunmen Zhuan(雲門傳) and Xingshihengyan(醒世恒言) ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen(李道人獨步雲門)’ are summarized as follows. First, the Xingshihengyan(醒世恒言) ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen(李道人獨步雲門)’ is based on a prose part of Yunmen Zhuan(雲門傳) written by local writers in the late Ming period Shandong Qingzhou, and there is no significant difference between the two books' clan-related content and perception. The two books was developed around Li Qing becoming a deity, but the importance of the clan was highlighted by confronting the clan society symmetrically with the world of gods. This is an example of how the Clan became the most important and realistic entity not only for the elite but also for the common people in the late Ming Dynasty. Second, the clan of the main character Li Qing was a clan composed of urban ordinary people and operated mainly by the chief. Although the shrine, clan's land, and genealogy, which are indicators of the Chinese clan, are not visible, the chief served as a ‘specific organization and system for clan management.’ Fast decision-making and maintaining a flexible cooperative system were very important in order to efficiently respond to pending issues, in cities with strong liquidity and diverse surnames, and the optimal organization was the chief system. The head of the urban clan was organized and operated into many branches[房支] like the clan of the village, but the degree of clan unity and the exercise of power of the chief were not as strong as that of the village and the leadership was different. For example, the chief Li Qing led the clan in a way that harmonized and stabilized the clan in a fair manner while minimizing interference and was respected by the clan. The clan of the common people of the city was so important that the capabilities of the chief determined the fate of the clan. While Li Qing was the chief, he was able to solve the needs of clan members living in the city and maintain Clan's stability, but the novel's setting that Clan fell into crisis and reached extinction in his absence is an example of readers' expectations for the chief at the time. Third, the clan cemetery is the representative material foundation of the Li Qing Clan, and it was a space for descendants to be buried after death and for ancestors and descendants to be together. If the first house or descendant that Li Qing visited after returning to Qigzhou city after being expelled from the world of gods was the starting point of clan society, the last ancestral tomb he visited was a condensed space of clan society's ‘past-present-future’ leading to ‘ancestor-self-descendants.’ Fourth, in Yunmen Zhuan and ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen’, many terms of clan containing letters such as ‘zong(宗)’, ‘zu(族)’, ‘qin(親)’, and ‘men(門)’ are seen. In particular, the frequent appearance of clan terms such as zongzu(宗族), zuzong fenmu(祖宗墳墓), zongqin(宗親), zongzhi(宗支), huazong(華宗), and zongpai(宗派) shows the reality that clan society is being activated in the late Ming Dynasty. In addition to the term of clan, there are many cases where various tomb names are mixed regardless. In addition to the difference in style between prose and verse, this can be said to be a language phenomenon that occurs as the popularization of clan society progresses. Fifth, the designation of Laozi(老子) Li Er(李耳) as the furthest ancestor of Lee Clan reflects the fact that famous clans in Shandong at the time confirmed the furthest ancestor or the first ancestor to migrate in the process of forming the clan.
Abstract
The Clan stories and Clan idea contained in the Yunmen Zhuan(雲門傳) and Xingshihengyan(醒世恒言) ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen(李道人獨步雲門)’ are summarized as follows. First, the Xingshihengyan(醒世恒言) ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen(李道人獨步雲門)’ is based on a prose part of Yunmen Zhuan(雲門傳) written by local writers in the late Ming period Shandong Qingzhou, and there is no significant difference between the two books' clan-related content and perception. The two books was developed around Li Qing becoming a deity, but the importance of the clan was highlighted by confronting the clan society symmetrically with the world of gods. This is an example of how the Clan became the most important and realistic entity not only for the elite but also for the common people in the late Ming Dynasty. Second, the clan of the main character Li Qing was a clan composed of urban ordinary people and operated mainly by the chief. Although the shrine, clan's land, and genealogy, which are indicators of the Chinese clan, are not visible, the chief served as a ‘specific organization and system for clan management.’ Fast decision-making and maintaining a flexible cooperative system were very important in order to efficiently respond to pending issues, in cities with strong liquidity and diverse surnames, and the optimal organization was the chief system. The head of the urban clan was organized and operated into many branches[房支] like the clan of the village, but the degree of clan unity and the exercise of power of the chief were not as strong as that of the village and the leadership was different. For example, the chief Li Qing led the clan in a way that harmonized and stabilized the clan in a fair manner while minimizing interference and was respected by the clan. The clan of the common people of the city was so important that the capabilities of the chief determined the fate of the clan. While Li Qing was the chief, he was able to solve the needs of clan members living in the city and maintain Clan's stability, but the novel's setting that Clan fell into crisis and reached extinction in his absence is an example of readers' expectations for the chief at the time. Third, the clan cemetery is the representative material foundation of the Li Qing Clan, and it was a space for descendants to be buried after death and for ancestors and descendants to be together. If the first house or descendant that Li Qing visited after returning to Qigzhou city after being expelled from the world of gods was the starting point of clan society, the last ancestral tomb he visited was a condensed space of clan society's ‘past-present-future’ leading to ‘ancestor-self-descendants.’ Fourth, in Yunmen Zhuan and ‘Li daoren dubu yunmen’, many terms of clan containing letters such as ‘zong(宗)’, ‘zu(族)’, ‘qin(親)’, and ‘men(門)’ are seen. In particular, the frequent appearance of clan terms such as zongzu(宗族), zuzong fenmu(祖宗墳墓), zongqin(宗親), zongzhi(宗支), huazong(華宗), and zongpai(宗派) shows the reality that clan society is being activated in the late Ming Dynasty. In addition to the term of clan, there are many cases where various tomb names are mixed regardless. In addition to the difference in style between prose and verse, this can be said to be a language phenomenon that occurs as the popularization of clan society progresses. Fifth, the designation of Laozi(老子) Li Er(李耳) as the furthest ancestor of Lee Clan reflects the fact that famous clans in Shandong at the time confirmed the furthest ancestor or the first ancestor to migrate in the process of forming the clan.
참고문헌 (53)
- 李昉, "太平廣記" (1996), 中華書局
- 不詳撰人, "雲門傳", 臺灣故宮博物院 所藏本 마이크로필름(國家圖書館 善本微捲 310.23 08639), ~
- 馮夢龍, "太平廣記抄" (2019), 崇文書局
- 馮夢龍, "醒世恒言" (2014), 中華書局
- 馮夢龍, "醒世恒言(葉敬池刊, 古本小說集成)" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 嘉靖, "靑州府志" (1982), 上海古籍出版社
- 嘉靖, "山東通志" (1990), 上海書店出版社
- 康熙, "益都縣志" (1976), 成文出版社
- 光緖, "益都縣圖志" (2006), 中国文史出版社
- 謝肇淛, "五雜俎" (1972), 汲古書院
- 풍몽룡, "醒世恒言", ~
- 모리스 프리드만, "동남부 중국의 종족조직" (1989), 대광문화사
- 서양걸, "중국가족제도사" (2000), 아카넷
- 원정식, "논문번역 : 송·명 이래 종족제의 형성 이론에 대한 변석(辨析)", 江原史學, (23), pp.373~407 (2008), 강원사학회
- 원정식, "역사용어사전" (2015), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 원정식, "종족 이야기와 종족 형성 - 明代 福建 香山曹氏 曹四公 이야기를 중심으로 -", 江原史學, (37), pp.221~253 (2021), 강원사학회[DOI]
- 원정식, "명말 화본소설 ‘三言’의 宗族 이야기와 宗族 인식 - 불멸의 세계로서의 종족과 관련하여 -", 江原史學, (39), pp.189~223 (2022), 강원사학회[DOI]
- 常建華, "宗族志" (1998), 上海人民出版社
- 常建華, "明代宗族組織化硏究" (2012), 故宮出版社
- 徐揚杰, "中國家族制度史" (1992), 人民出版社
- 徐揚杰, "宋明家族制度史論" (1995), 中華書局
- 徐華根, "江陰著姓望族" (2008), 上海古籍出版社出版
- 吳仁安, "明清江南著姓望族史" (2009), 上海人民出版社
- 吳仁安, "明清時期上海地區的著姓望族" (1997), 上海人民出版社
- 吳眞, "孤本說唱詞話〈雲門傳〉研究" (2020), 中華書局
- 李文治, "中國宗法宗族制和族田義莊" (2000), 社會科學文献出版社
- 朱麗霞, "清代松江府望族與文學研究" (2006), 上海古籍出版社
- 馮爾康, "中國古代的宗族與祠堂" (1996), 商務印書館國際有限公司
- 馮爾康, "中國宗族史" (2009), 上海人民出版社
- 馮爾康, "宗族史話" (2012), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 韓南, "韓南中國小說論集" (2008), 北京大學出版社
- 孔迈隆, "中國北方的宗族組織", 家庭與性别評論, (4) (2013)
- 杜靖, "從系譜宗族到實体宗族 : 明代中後期以來中國宗族的發育與演化 — 以山東滕陽閔氏宗族爲例", 中央民族大學學報, (2) (2017)
- 馬翠, "明清山東望族初探", 碩士, pp.2009
- 常建華, "明代墓祠祭祖述論", 天津師範大學學報, (4) (2003)
- 常建華, "明清北方宗族的新探索(2014-2019年)", 安徽史學, 5 (2020)
- 吳亮, "明清魯西北望族與基層社會", 碩士, pp.2016
- 吳眞, "從說唱詞話到白話小說的演進 — 以馮夢龍改編"雲門傳"爲例", 文學評論, (2) (2020)
- 汪潤, "華北的祖塋與宗族組織 : 明清房山祖塋碑铭解析", 碩士, pp.2006
- 王日根, "從墓地, 族譜到祠堂 : 明清山東栖霞宗族凝聚纽帶的變迁", 歷史硏究, (2) (2008)
- 劉巧莉, "近十年明清時期華北宗族研究綜述", 中国史研究动态, (5) (2015)
- 任雅萱, "大户與宗族 : 明清山東"門"型系譜流變與實踐", 史林, (1) (2021)
- 任雅萱, "明代山東中部的墓祭禮儀與宗族觀念", 民俗典籍文字研究, 21 (2018)
- 張先剛, "從墓地, 族譜到祠堂-明清山東栖霞宗族變迁", 碩士, pp.2007
- 錢杭, "中國的"北方宗族"與宗族的"北方類型"", 烟台大學學報(哲學社會科學), 34(6) (2021)
- 周曉冀, "近世山東宗族的重構與地域開發 — 以清代以降魯中地方志爲中心", 中國社會歷史評論, 19 (2017), 天津古籍出版社
- 周曉冀, "明清譜碑與魯中宗族地域性的形成", 社會史研究, 6 (2018)
- 陳雪明, "明清徽州宗族墓祭儀禮", 宜賓學院學報, 13(11) (2013)
- 中國農村慣行調査刊行委員會, "中國農村慣行調査" (1958), 岩波書店
- 滋賀秀三, "中國家族法の原理" (1981), 創文社
- Shuhui Yang, "Stories to awaken the world: a Ming dynasty collection" (2009), University of Washington Press
- Patrick Dewes Hanan, "The Yün-men Chuan : From Shantefable to Short Story", Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, 36 (1973)
