위태로운 천하: 명말 時事小說 ≪遼海丹忠錄≫에 나타난 對 明⋅後金⋅朝鮮 인식
The Precarious World: Awareness of the Ming Dynasty, Later Jin, and the Joseon Dynasty (明⋅後金⋅朝鮮) Shown in Liaohai Danzhonglu (遼海丹忠錄), the Current-affair Novel (時事小說) in the Late Ming Dynasty
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Liaohai Danzhonglu (遼海丹忠錄), the current-affair novel (時事小說) in the late Ming Dynasty (明末) describes situations among the Ming Dynasty, Later jin, and the Joseon Dynasty (明⋅後金⋅朝鮮) in the rapidly changing East Asian situation by focusing on the wars between the Ming Dynasty and the Later jin in the early 17th century. The work ‘realistically’ narrates acute international dynamics and vividly reveals the aspects of awareness of the contemporary interested countries from the viewpoint of the Ming-Qing transition period when ideals of “Chinese world order” are farthest from the realities. Awareness of each country in the work generally reveals double aspects and shows the aspects that relative recognition and vigilance awareness are remarkable. In the case of the Ming Dynasty, it still reveals the ideal ideology as the Celestial Empire (天朝大國) and the Chinese empire, but it shows the tendency which reveals relative recognition or vigilance awareness to be very aware of peripheral/external powers and look at itself on the defensive in the realities of the acute international relationships more strongly. And “China consciousness” is emphasized as a country that has a nationalistic tendency. In case of the Later Jin, it basically shows the tendency to reveal the negative perception of degrading and despising the other countries consistently based on the traditional perspectives of Chinese and Barbarian (華夷觀). On the other hand, it often cast light on their strong points and reveals awareness of looking at the Later jin and “China” as the relative relationships as each country. And it reveals that it actually regarded the Later Jin as “the neighboring enemy country” (隣敵國) by expressing thorough antagonism as another aspect of relative recognition in the meantime. In case of the Joseon Dynasty, the relative view which look at it as the independent foreign country and the viewpoint of the perspectives of Chinese and Barbarian to look at it as a representative foreign “subordinate country” that supports the “Chinese world order” are generally mixed. In the work, the Joseon Dynasty shows the tendency to be regarded as the small and weak “subordinate state” and at the same time, is recognized as the foreign country to make sure to cooperate with to defend the country called the Ming Dynasty and object to check not to make it cooperate with the Later Jin, “the neighboring enemy country.” On the other hand, the work continues to cause nationalistic sentiment and appeal to the heart to defend “the country.” It is worthy of a representative example which makes people get a sense of the aspect that a kind of discussion on patriotism is narrated and becomes popular through the popular medium called the novel as the development of Chinese narrative genre meets the historical background of the Ming-Qing transition period. And it is also another good example to show that the genre of the novel played a unneglectable role of reflecting and reproducing “China”’s perception of the self and others.
Abstract
Liaohai Danzhonglu (遼海丹忠錄), the current-affair novel (時事小說) in the late Ming Dynasty (明末) describes situations among the Ming Dynasty, Later jin, and the Joseon Dynasty (明⋅後金⋅朝鮮) in the rapidly changing East Asian situation by focusing on the wars between the Ming Dynasty and the Later jin in the early 17th century. The work ‘realistically’ narrates acute international dynamics and vividly reveals the aspects of awareness of the contemporary interested countries from the viewpoint of the Ming-Qing transition period when ideals of “Chinese world order” are farthest from the realities. Awareness of each country in the work generally reveals double aspects and shows the aspects that relative recognition and vigilance awareness are remarkable. In the case of the Ming Dynasty, it still reveals the ideal ideology as the Celestial Empire (天朝大國) and the Chinese empire, but it shows the tendency which reveals relative recognition or vigilance awareness to be very aware of peripheral/external powers and look at itself on the defensive in the realities of the acute international relationships more strongly. And “China consciousness” is emphasized as a country that has a nationalistic tendency. In case of the Later Jin, it basically shows the tendency to reveal the negative perception of degrading and despising the other countries consistently based on the traditional perspectives of Chinese and Barbarian (華夷觀). On the other hand, it often cast light on their strong points and reveals awareness of looking at the Later jin and “China” as the relative relationships as each country. And it reveals that it actually regarded the Later Jin as “the neighboring enemy country” (隣敵國) by expressing thorough antagonism as another aspect of relative recognition in the meantime. In case of the Joseon Dynasty, the relative view which look at it as the independent foreign country and the viewpoint of the perspectives of Chinese and Barbarian to look at it as a representative foreign “subordinate country” that supports the “Chinese world order” are generally mixed. In the work, the Joseon Dynasty shows the tendency to be regarded as the small and weak “subordinate state” and at the same time, is recognized as the foreign country to make sure to cooperate with to defend the country called the Ming Dynasty and object to check not to make it cooperate with the Later Jin, “the neighboring enemy country.” On the other hand, the work continues to cause nationalistic sentiment and appeal to the heart to defend “the country.” It is worthy of a representative example which makes people get a sense of the aspect that a kind of discussion on patriotism is narrated and becomes popular through the popular medium called the novel as the development of Chinese narrative genre meets the historical background of the Ming-Qing transition period. And it is also another good example to show that the genre of the novel played a unneglectable role of reflecting and reproducing “China”’s perception of the self and others.
참고문헌 (26)
- "新鐫出像通俗演義遼海丹忠録"[URL]
- "古本小說叢刊 第7輯4-5" (1990), 中華書局
- 苗壯, "遼海丹忠錄" (1989), 遼瀋書社
- "古本小說集成 32" (1990), 上海古籍出版社
- 육인룡, "요해단충록 1-8" (2020), 보고사
- 김한규, "천하국가 : 전통 시대 동아시아 세계 질서" (2005), 소나무
- 거자오광, "이 중국에 거하라" (2012), 글항아리
- 李紹强, "袁崇焕之死與明末的黨爭", 齊魯學刊, (1) (1983)
- 齊裕焜, "明末淸初時事小說述評", 福建師範大學學報, (2) (1989)
- 郭浩帆, "略論時事小說的思想特徵", 濟南大學學寶, (創刊) (1990)
- 白堅, "毛文龍是英雄還是罪人――關於≪遼海丹忠錄≫的思考", 明淸小說硏究, (1) (1995)
- 胡蓮玉, "≪遼海丹忠錄≫試評", 南京農業大學學報, (3) (2003)
- 張平仁, "≪遼海丹忠錄≫與≪鎭海春秋≫眞實性及文體歸屬", 齊齊哈爾大學學報, (11) (2003)
- 한명기, "16, 17세기 明淸交替와 한반도 ―‘再造之恩’, 銀, 그리고 쿠데타의 변주곡―", 명청사연구, (22), pp.37~64 (2004), 명청사학회
- 정병철, "明末 遼東 沿海 일대의 ‘海上勢力’", 명청사연구, (23), pp.143~170 (2005), 명청사학회
- 양승민, "≪遼海丹忠錄≫을 통해 본 명청교체기의 중국과 조선", 고전과 해석, 2 (2007)
- 양승민, "중국 禁書小說 속의 명청교체기 朝鮮 -<鎭海春秋>에 형상화된 허구적 진실-", 고소설연구, (24), pp.253~288 (2007), 한국고소설학회
- 井玉貴, "歷史上的毛文龍及其在時事小說中的反映", 明淸小說硏究, (3) (2008)
- 김선민, "명말 요동 변경지역을 둘러싼 명-후금-조선의 삼각관계", 중국사연구, (55), pp.207~245 (2008), 중국사학회
- 許軍, "據假相創作的時事小說的眞實性――評≪鎭海春秋≫與≪遼海丹忠錄≫", 明淸小說硏究, (1) (2012)
- 唐亞蕾, "傳報輿情紀實說部――論明朝邸報對時事小說≪遼海丹忠錄≫的影響", 浙江理工大學學報, (3) (2013)
- 한명기, "明淸交替 시기 朝中關係의 추이", 동양사학연구, (140), pp.43~85 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 萬晴川, "論明代通俗小說的政治書寫――以重大歷史事件題材小說爲例", 社會科學文摘 (2020)
- 임경준, "명말(明末) 소설 『요해단충록』(遼海丹忠錄)과 사르후 전투", 동서비교문학저널, (54), pp.355~378 (2020), 한국동서비교문학학회
- 한명기, "조선시대 韓中日 관계와 相互認識의 추이", 한국학연구, (57), pp.351~390 (2020), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 김효민, "華夷觀과 ‘중국의식’의 시각에서 본 ≪水滸傳≫", 중국어문논총, (106), pp.123~154 (2021), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
