1930년대 ‘피[血]’의 담론과 일본어 소설
The Discourse of ‘Blood’ and the Korean Novel by Japanese Language in 1930s
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to clear up the relation of national discourse and scientific discourse about 'blood'. Blood is natural thing. But it has the connotation of nation; nation is the people of one blood. But the relation of blood and nation can be possible by ideology. The ideology is nationalism. By the way the scientific discourse of blood was considered that it has no connotation and ideology. But national discourse of blood was supported by scientific discourse and the latter was directed by the former. In 1930's combine of two discourses was tight. The claimants of pure blood has adopted the science of blood. It was about blood type. The scientist(doctor) of blood asserted the relation of blood and individual temperament. And they asserted the relation of blood and national temperament. The Korean novelist who wrote in Japanese had interested in blood. The blood was the biggest obstacle of unification of Korean and Japanese. But they describe blood as their unreducible nationality(Han Seol-ya) or universality(Lee Hyo-seok).
Abstract
This paper aims to clear up the relation of national discourse and scientific discourse about 'blood'. Blood is natural thing. But it has the connotation of nation; nation is the people of one blood. But the relation of blood and nation can be possible by ideology. The ideology is nationalism. By the way the scientific discourse of blood was considered that it has no connotation and ideology. But national discourse of blood was supported by scientific discourse and the latter was directed by the former. In 1930's combine of two discourses was tight. The claimants of pure blood has adopted the science of blood. It was about blood type. The scientist(doctor) of blood asserted the relation of blood and individual temperament. And they asserted the relation of blood and national temperament. The Korean novelist who wrote in Japanese had interested in blood. The blood was the biggest obstacle of unification of Korean and Japanese. But they describe blood as their unreducible nationality(Han Seol-ya) or universality(Lee Hyo-seok).
참고문헌 (16)
- "매일신보, 조선일보, 동아일보, 국민신보,여성, 가정지우, 국민문학", ~
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전(하)" (1999), 두산동아
- "21세기 세종계획", 국립국어연구원[URL]
- 권석운, "란트슈타이너가 들려주는 혈액형 이야기" (2005), 자음과모음
- 이광수, "이광수전집(3)(4)(6)" (1971), 삼중당
- 인제학원, "선각자 백인제" (1999), 창작과비평사
- 최재서, "전환기의 조선문학" (2006), 영남대출판부
- 야나부 아키라, "번역어 성립사정" (2003), 일빛
- 小熊英二, "單一民族神話の起源" (1995), 新曜社
- 京城帝國大學大陸文化硏究會, "大陸文化硏究" (1943), 京城帝國大學大陸文化硏究會
- 京城帝國大學同窓會, "紺碧遥かに" (1974), 耕文社
- 朝鮮總督府高等法院檢事局思想部, "思想彙報", ~ (1940)
- 古川竹二, "血液型と気質" (1932), 三省堂
- 古川竹二, "血液型と民族性" (1935), 金原商店
- 古畑種基, "血液型の話" (1962), 岩波新書
- 김문겸, "문화이론: 사회학적 접근 1장 고전 사회 이론에서의 문화" (2008), 이학사