이효석의 일본어 소설 시대인식 연구-「은은한 빛」이 제기하는 ‘ 조선적인 것’
A Study on the Perception in the Japanese Colonial era of Lee Hyo-seok’s Japanese Work
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lee is commonly known to have western aesthetic consciousness. But I notice his works in Japanese and the meaning of writhing in Japanese in the view of diglossia. In the late colonial era, Korean writers couldn’t write in their mother tongue and Hangul for Japanese colonial cultural policy. So they should had written in Japanese about Korean people’s life, culture, nature, etc. Japanese authorities permitted to write in Korean about only justification of Japan’s colonial rule and militarism. Colonial government sought to Joseonness(Korean like things) to remove it, Korean writers looked for it to confirm their ethnic identity. This was a very ironic situation for Korean writers. According to above, the issue of making tradition as one of nation-building processes is significant in the field of Korean modern literature study, especially ‘writing in Japanese’ and ‘national literature’ in the late colonial era. At that time, a case happened that ‘a kisaeng put on a antique crown’, as this had been revealed newspapers and intellectuals become angry. That is, they regarded the crown as one of cultural properties of Joseon. I think that the reflection of the case was one of evidences of the spread and growing of social consciousness. Lee took the case as a motif for his Japanese novel 「The Elegant Light」. It is a story about a sword made in Goguryeo era. I think that Lee wanted to show that colonial Joseon people began to aware sociocultural and economic exchangeable values of ancient artifacts. As we know, at the same times many colonial intellectuals got to know modern nation-state system, too. At this point, some issues are raised, for example ethno-nationalism, colonialism, orientalism, ethnic identity, cultural capital, national literature, etc. This paper explores how are these issues represented to Lee’s critical awareness on social problems in his Japanese novel The Elegant Light and some columns. His times that Lee understood was in a bud stage of Joseon’s social cognition on indigenous tradition. Nevertheless, The Elegant Light shows successfully his aesthetic consciousness like his other works.
Abstract
Lee is commonly known to have western aesthetic consciousness. But I notice his works in Japanese and the meaning of writhing in Japanese in the view of diglossia. In the late colonial era, Korean writers couldn’t write in their mother tongue and Hangul for Japanese colonial cultural policy. So they should had written in Japanese about Korean people’s life, culture, nature, etc. Japanese authorities permitted to write in Korean about only justification of Japan’s colonial rule and militarism. Colonial government sought to Joseonness(Korean like things) to remove it, Korean writers looked for it to confirm their ethnic identity. This was a very ironic situation for Korean writers. According to above, the issue of making tradition as one of nation-building processes is significant in the field of Korean modern literature study, especially ‘writing in Japanese’ and ‘national literature’ in the late colonial era. At that time, a case happened that ‘a kisaeng put on a antique crown’, as this had been revealed newspapers and intellectuals become angry. That is, they regarded the crown as one of cultural properties of Joseon. I think that the reflection of the case was one of evidences of the spread and growing of social consciousness. Lee took the case as a motif for his Japanese novel 「The Elegant Light」. It is a story about a sword made in Goguryeo era. I think that Lee wanted to show that colonial Joseon people began to aware sociocultural and economic exchangeable values of ancient artifacts. As we know, at the same times many colonial intellectuals got to know modern nation-state system, too. At this point, some issues are raised, for example ethno-nationalism, colonialism, orientalism, ethnic identity, cultural capital, national literature, etc. This paper explores how are these issues represented to Lee’s critical awareness on social problems in his Japanese novel The Elegant Light and some columns. His times that Lee understood was in a bud stage of Joseon’s social cognition on indigenous tradition. Nevertheless, The Elegant Light shows successfully his aesthetic consciousness like his other works.
참고문헌 (19)
- 이효석, "은은한 빛", 문예 (1940)
- 이효석, "춘향전 내연 무렵" (1939), 금융조합
- 이효석, "유도 소식", 경성일보, ~ (1940)
- 이효석, "국민의 마음 훈련과정을", 삼천리 (1941)
- 이효석, "일본어가 세계어로" (1942), 녹기
- 이효석, "금후 어떻게 써야 하는가" (1942), 국민문학
- 이효석, "새로운 국민 문예의 길" (1942), 국민문학
- 이효석, "문학과 국민성", 매일신보, ~ (1942)
- 이효석, "은빛 송어" (2005), 해토
- 박남용, "1930년대 하얼빈과 상하이의 도시 풍경과 도시 인식 - 이효석의 「하얼빈(哈爾濱)」과 穆時英의 「상하이 폭스트롯(上海的狐步舞)」을 중심으로", 세계문학비교연구, (25), pp.29~48 (2008), 세계문학비교학회
- 곽형덕, "김사량, 작품과 연구. 2" (2009), 역락
- 김양선, "공모와 저항의 경계, 이효석의 국민문학론", 작가세계, 통권 : 75, pp.54~69 (2007)
- 차승기, "문학 속의 파시즘" (2001), 삼인
- 문경연, "좌담회로 읽는 '국민문학'" (2010), 소명출판
- 심원섭, "일본 유학생 문인들의 대정 소화 체험" (2009), 소명 출판
- 오태영, "평양 토포필리아와 고도의 재장소화 -이효석의 「은은한 빛」을 중심으로-", 상허학보, 28, pp.237~277 (2010), 상허학회
- 엄경희, "이효석 평론에 나타난 문학 정체성", 한국문학이론과 비평, 12(1), pp.395~416 (2008), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 장문석, "만들어진 전통" (2004), 휴머니스트
- Rader, Mebin Miller, "예술과 인간가치" (2001), 까치
