가람 이병기의 「時調는 革新하자」에 나타난 현대성의 의미
Meaning of Modernity in Garam Yi Byeong-Ki’s <Let’s reform sijo>
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It’s Garam Yi Byeong-Ki that presented the modern aesthetic consciousness on sijo in earnest with systematized logic. Since then, Korean sijo has been said to start research on modern aesthetic consciousness. Garam presented <Let’s reform sijo>, noticeable theory on sijo, in 1932. It suggests a variety of methods to reform sijo. The reformation is related with methods to modernize sijo, which can be called modernity of sijo. The modernity doesn’t mean just modern time as specific era, but normative direction defining specific era as a significant one. In this regard there should be regular normative direction for modernity of sijo. After modern times sijo needs normative direction defining this time as a specific era to get modernity. The normative direction isn’t decided by an individual dogma, but appropriateness of the times and universal validity satisfying majority. If a poet or a poem is said not to fill the modernity, it is caused by this context. It is not different for Garam to suggest various methods for modernizing sijo in <Let’s reform sijo>. Although his suggestion has much to be desired as universal and satisfying object, it is much significant as a concrete method tried almost for the first time to modernize Korean sijo.
Abstract
It’s Garam Yi Byeong-Ki that presented the modern aesthetic consciousness on sijo in earnest with systematized logic. Since then, Korean sijo has been said to start research on modern aesthetic consciousness. Garam presented <Let’s reform sijo>, noticeable theory on sijo, in 1932. It suggests a variety of methods to reform sijo. The reformation is related with methods to modernize sijo, which can be called modernity of sijo. The modernity doesn’t mean just modern time as specific era, but normative direction defining specific era as a significant one. In this regard there should be regular normative direction for modernity of sijo. After modern times sijo needs normative direction defining this time as a specific era to get modernity. The normative direction isn’t decided by an individual dogma, but appropriateness of the times and universal validity satisfying majority. If a poet or a poem is said not to fill the modernity, it is caused by this context. It is not different for Garam to suggest various methods for modernizing sijo in <Let’s reform sijo>. Although his suggestion has much to be desired as universal and satisfying object, it is much significant as a concrete method tried almost for the first time to modernize Korean sijo.
참고문헌 (17)
- 권영민, "최남선과 시조부흥 운동", 萬海祝典 資料集, 584~ (2006)
- 위르겐 하버마스, "현대성의 철학적 담론" (1996), 문예출판사
- 劉若愚, "중국시학" (1984), 대만문화공사, 동화출판공사
- 유종호, "유구한 역사와 반모더니즘", 萬海祝典 資料集, 716~ (2006)
- 이광수, "文學이란 何오", pp.10~23 (1916), 每日申報
- 이규보, "백운소설"
- 이마누엘 칸트, "판단력 비판" (2006), 책세상
- 이병기, "時調란 무엇인가", 東亞日報, 10~11 (1926)
- 이병기, "時調는 革新하자", 東亞日報, 23~24. (1932)
- 이병기, "時調의 發展과 歌曲과의 區分", 診斷學報, ~ (1934)
- 이병한, "중국 고전시학의 이해" (1992), 문학과지성사
- 이은상, "時調創作問題", 東亞日報, ~ (1932)
- 차승기, "반근대적 상상력의 임계들" (2009), 푸른역사
- 최남선, "朝鮮國民文學으로서의 時調", 朝鮮文壇, ~ (1926)
- 최남선, "時調는 復興할 것인가" (1927), 新民
- 최동호, "한겨레신문", ~ (2011)
- Barth, John, "The Literature of Exhaustion", Atlantic (1967)
