러시아어 동사 БИТЬ의 의미-통사적 특성: 양태/결과 동사 분류를 중심으로
Semantic and Syntactic characteristics of Russian Verb BIT' : Manner/Result Verb Dichotomy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is mainly based on a manner and result verb dichotomy. It can be said that this dichotomy also plays a role in understanding the semantic, syntactic characteristics of Russian verb bit', as in English. However, 'The manner/result complementarity' and 'The argument realization property of manner/result verbs' in Russian need language specific explanation. Although Russian verb bit' was classified in previous studies as manner verb, I argue that it is a complex verb, including both meanings of manner and result, as verb rezat'(cut), and this semantic characteristic shows various argument realizations. Therefore, in “bit' stekla” verb bit' means 'break by hitting'(i.e. manner + result), then the argument PATIENT of the verb is expressed as in accusative case, although it is inanimate (cf. in "bit' po stolu/ v dver'" verb bit' means 'hit' (manner) with the inanimate surface argument in PP).
Abstract
This study is mainly based on a manner and result verb dichotomy. It can be said that this dichotomy also plays a role in understanding the semantic, syntactic characteristics of Russian verb bit', as in English. However, 'The manner/result complementarity' and 'The argument realization property of manner/result verbs' in Russian need language specific explanation. Although Russian verb bit' was classified in previous studies as manner verb, I argue that it is a complex verb, including both meanings of manner and result, as verb rezat'(cut), and this semantic characteristic shows various argument realizations. Therefore, in “bit' stekla” verb bit' means 'break by hitting'(i.e. manner + result), then the argument PATIENT of the verb is expressed as in accusative case, although it is inanimate (cf. in "bit' po stolu/ v dver'" verb bit' means 'hit' (manner) with the inanimate surface argument in PP).
참고문헌 (24)
- 김경학, "양태-결과동사의 상보성과 동사 cut에 대해", 언어, 38(1), pp.67~86 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 김남희, "러시아어 타격동사의 조어적 특성", 석사, 노어노문학, pp.2001
- Апресян Ю. Д., "Лексическая семантика: синонимические средстваязыка" (1995), Языки русской культуры
- Апресян Ю. Д., "Zbornik Matice Srpske za Slavistiku", pp.49~62 (2007)
- Бабенко Л. Г., "Толковый словарь русских глаголов:Идеографическое описание. Английские эквиваленты. Синонимы. Антонимы" (1999), АСТ-ПРЕСС КНИГА
- Дубровина И. В., "Национальный корпус русского языка и проблемы гуманитарногообразования", pp.109~121 (2007), ТЕИС
- Добрушина Е. Р., "Бьют ли фонтан и часы одним и тем же БИТЬ? Проблемы семантического описание многозначных языковыхединиц", Диалог 2000, Computational Linguistics and its Applications, International Workshop, 1 (2000)
- Евгеньева А. П., "Словарь русского языка: в 4-х т" (1992), АНСССР
- Кузнецов С. А., "Большой толковый словарь русского языка. 1-еиздание" (1998), Норинт
- Кустова Г. И., "Типы производных значений и механизмы языковогорасширения" (2004), Языки славянской культуры
- Михалев А. Б., "Семантические законы в свете полисемии", Университетские чтения, 1, pp.21~27 (2011)
- Ожегов С. И., "Словарь русского языка" (1990), Русский язык
- Петров А. В., "Этимолого-семантические микрополя в русском языке", Мова. Науково-теоретичний часопис з мовознавства, 17, pp.79~84 (2012)
- Плотникова А. М., "Широкозначные глаголы в современном русскомязыке", Известия Уральского государственного университета, 1, pp.2(63) (2009), 24~31
- Фаткуллина Ф. Г., "О деструктивной лексике русского языка", Международная конференция Языковая семантика и образ мира (1997)
- Чабаненко Т. С., "Парадигма русского глагола: критерии выделения, объем, уровни описания", Ученые записки Таврическогонационального университета им. В.И. Вернадского, Серия«Филология. Социальные коммуникации», 25(1)통권 : 64, pp.69~75 (2012)
- Шмелев А., "Смыслы, тексты идругие захватывающие сюжеты. Сборник статей в честь 80-летияИ", pp.573~586 (2012), Языки славянскойкультуры
- Fillmore C. J., "Readings in English Transformational Grammar", pp.120~133 (1970), Ginn
- Guerssel M., "A Cross-Linguistic Study of Transitivity Alternations", Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.48~63 (1985)
- Levin B., "Manner and Result: Implications for Argument Realization Across Languages", Handout for Heinrich-Heine Universität, ~ (2012)
- "Verb classes within and across languages" (2013)[URL]
- "Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity" (2011)[URL]
- Rappaport Hovav M., "The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors", pp.97~134 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Rappaport Hovav M., "Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure", pp.21~38 (2010), Oxford University Press