『백치』에 나타난 시각과 기억의 문제 연구
A study on the vision and memory in Dostoevsky's novel Idiot
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
『The Idiot』 was a novel well known for Dostoevsky's intention to make a hero like Christ and Don Quixote. So a lot of researchers are interested in Myshkin's image and have tried to find the parallel between Christ and Myshkin. In this paper a researcher stresses that not only Myshkin's memory(‘sensory memory’) and experience in Swiss, but also his way of seeing are related to the his tragic life: he could not rescue Nastas'ia Fillipovna from Rogozhin and his epilepsy recurred. Indeed, Myshkin wanted to meet russian people and find their faiths in russian reality. In spite of his trial and hope, he was frustrated because he remembered his past lives in Swiss and they kept him from finding 'goodness' in russians. In this way Myshkin's sense of life and musing on life derive not from his past experience, but from an immediate perception of world and man. After all, Myshkin realized that russian faith can be seen not through symbol(for example, cross) of reality, but in their minds. That is the way Dostoevsky shows the imperfect 'russian Christ', Myshkin as ‘Homo Opticus’ and ‘Homo Memoris’.
Abstract
『The Idiot』 was a novel well known for Dostoevsky's intention to make a hero like Christ and Don Quixote. So a lot of researchers are interested in Myshkin's image and have tried to find the parallel between Christ and Myshkin. In this paper a researcher stresses that not only Myshkin's memory(‘sensory memory’) and experience in Swiss, but also his way of seeing are related to the his tragic life: he could not rescue Nastas'ia Fillipovna from Rogozhin and his epilepsy recurred. Indeed, Myshkin wanted to meet russian people and find their faiths in russian reality. In spite of his trial and hope, he was frustrated because he remembered his past lives in Swiss and they kept him from finding 'goodness' in russians. In this way Myshkin's sense of life and musing on life derive not from his past experience, but from an immediate perception of world and man. After all, Myshkin realized that russian faith can be seen not through symbol(for example, cross) of reality, but in their minds. That is the way Dostoevsky shows the imperfect 'russian Christ', Myshkin as ‘Homo Opticus’ and ‘Homo Memoris’.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권철근, "『백치』에 나타난 므이쉬킨의 사랑과 겸허: 도스토예프스키의 그리스도론", 슬라브학보, 18(2), pp.89~116 (2003), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 권철근, "도스토예프스키 장편소설의 병리학: 살인과 간질", 노어노문학, 18(3), pp.105~139 (2006), 한국노어노문학회
- 권철근, "백치의 로고진과 ‘이블 아이 Evil Eye’", 외국문학연구, (57), pp.33~54 (2015), 외국문학연구소
- 도스토예프스키, "백치 상, 중, 하" (1997), 범우사
- 루카치, "변혁기 러시아의 리얼리즘 문학" (1986), 동녘
- 맥거프, "기억과 감정" (2012), 시그마프레스
- 사미자, "기억에 관한 이론적 고찰", 장신논단, 12(24), pp.425~456 (2005)
- 석영중, "뇌를 훔친 소설가" (2001), 예담
- 석영중, "도스또예프스끼의 『백치』와 강생", 슬라브학보, 21(1), pp.91~113 (2006), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 석영중, "도스토예프스키와 신경미학:『백치』에 나타난 시각의 문제를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (53), pp.65~92 (2016), 한국러시아문학회
- 아른하임 루돌프, "시각적 사고" (2004), 이화여대 출판부
- 이득재, "도스또옙스끼의 백치 속에 나타난 얼굴-표상의 문제", 러시아어문학연구논집, (15), pp.101~124 (2004), 한국러시아문학회
- 이진우, "호모 메모리스. 기억과 망각에 관한 17가지 해석" (2014), 책세상
- 야스만 알리아다, "기억의 공간" (2011), 그린비
- 임수정, "도스또예쁘스끼 소설 연구", pp.143~172 (1999), 열린책들
- 조유선, "도스토예프스키와 간질: ‘투병기’로서 『백치』 읽기", 슬라브학보, 30(1), pp.361~394 (2015), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 플레허티 앨리스, "하이퍼그라피아" (2006), 휘슬러
- Бахтин М．М．, "Проблемы поэтики Достоевского" (1979), СоветскаяРоссия
- Достоевский Ф．М．, "Полн．собр соч. в 30 т. Т.８" (1973), Наука
- Касаткина Т., "Достоевский в конце XX века" (1996), классикаплюс
- Криллова И．А．, "Достоевский: Материалы и Исследования вып．４" (1980), наука
- Криницын В．Я, "Исповедь подпольногочеловека К антропологии Ф．М．Достоевского" (2001), Макс Пресс
- Левина Л．А．, "Достоевский в конце XX века", pp.343~368 (1996), классика плюс
- Назиров Р．Г．, "Достоевский: Материалы и Исследования. вып.10" (1992), наука
- Степанян К., "роман <<Идиот>>" (2001), Наследие
- Степанян К., "Достоевский и мировая культура" (1998), классика плюс
- Ivanits L., "Dostoevsky and the russian people" (2011), Cambridge UP
- Knapp L., "The Annihilation of Inertia" (1996), Northwestern UP
- Lukacs G., "The theory of the Novel" (1971), MIT Press
- Miller R. F., "Dostoevsky and the Idiot:Author, Narrator, and Reader" (1981), Harvard UP
- Piskunova S. I., "Except the Four of Us, The Idiot as a Reflection of Don Quixote de la Mancha", Russian Studies in Literature, 44(1), pp.24~49 (2008)