러시아어 동사 상적 삼중쌍 논의에 부쳐
Verbal Aspectual Triplets in Russian : A Corpus Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A study on aspectual triplets in Russian gives an interesting perspective on how to analyze and evaluate Russian verbal aspectual system as a whole. Russian verbal aspect is the lexico-grammatical category in which lexical and aspectual features are still more closely related to each other, than many researchers have considered. We think that this close relationship between them has been underestimated. In this article, we critically analyzed previous studies on aspectual triplets, such as Зализняк & Шмелёв(2000), Зализняк & Микаэлян(2010), and Храковский(2005). If we treat Russian verbal aspect as a purely grammatical system, we are likely to fall into a methodological dilemma, as Зализняк & Шмелев did. But if we focus on a lexical synonymy, which Храковский set as a criterion for judging aspectual triplets, we can be relatively free from that kind of dilemma. Nonetheless, we must say that Храковский did not fully pay attention to differences in the usages between primary and secondary imperfective aspects. In this study, we analyzed the examples extracted from the Russian National Corpus to reveal differences in the usages of the verbs ‘читать vs. прочитывать’, ‘есть vs. съедать’, and ‘пить vs выпивать’. The differences in the usages between them turned out to be evident. Primary imperfective aspect fulfills such functions, as ‘ordinary imperfective usages’, ‘relative backgrounding’, and ‘atemporal evaluation’, whereas secondary imperfective aspect fulfills such functions, as ‘quantitative specification’, ‘relative foregrounding/focusing’, ‘metaphorical focalization’, ‘pseuo-historical present’ and ‘dramatic present’ and so on.
Abstract
A study on aspectual triplets in Russian gives an interesting perspective on how to analyze and evaluate Russian verbal aspectual system as a whole. Russian verbal aspect is the lexico-grammatical category in which lexical and aspectual features are still more closely related to each other, than many researchers have considered. We think that this close relationship between them has been underestimated. In this article, we critically analyzed previous studies on aspectual triplets, such as Зализняк & Шмелёв(2000), Зализняк & Микаэлян(2010), and Храковский(2005). If we treat Russian verbal aspect as a purely grammatical system, we are likely to fall into a methodological dilemma, as Зализняк & Шмелев did. But if we focus on a lexical synonymy, which Храковский set as a criterion for judging aspectual triplets, we can be relatively free from that kind of dilemma. Nonetheless, we must say that Храковский did not fully pay attention to differences in the usages between primary and secondary imperfective aspects. In this study, we analyzed the examples extracted from the Russian National Corpus to reveal differences in the usages of the verbs ‘читать vs. прочитывать’, ‘есть vs. съедать’, and ‘пить vs выпивать’. The differences in the usages between them turned out to be evident. Primary imperfective aspect fulfills such functions, as ‘ordinary imperfective usages’, ‘relative backgrounding’, and ‘atemporal evaluation’, whereas secondary imperfective aspect fulfills such functions, as ‘quantitative specification’, ‘relative foregrounding/focusing’, ‘metaphorical focalization’, ‘pseuo-historical present’ and ‘dramatic present’ and so on.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이주홍, "ГИБНУТЬ vs. ПОГИБАТЬ: 상적, 어휘의미적 특징들", 러시아학, 23, pp.23~58 (2021), 러시아 • 알타이지역 연구소
- 홍택규, "러시아어 동사 상의 범주적 속성:유형론적 관점과 문법화를 배경으로", 비교문화연구, 33, pp.461~494 (2013), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 홍택규, "내러티브 현재", 과거에 관하여: K. Hamburger의 서사이론을 중심으로, 2014, pp.(47), 201~243[DOI]
- 홍택규, "Анна А. Зализняк & А.Д. Шмелёв의 러시아어 상 기술방법론 검토: 중화와 사건성의 문제를 중심으로", 슬라브硏究, 32(4), pp.105~146 (2016), 러시아연구소[DOI]
- Апресян Ю.Д., "Труды аспектологического семинара филологическогофакультета МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова. Т. 2" (1997)
- Бондарко А.В., "Вид и время русского глагола. ТеорияМорфологических категорий и аспектологические исследования" (2005), ЯСК
- Зализняк А., "Конференция Диалог", pp.130~136 (2010)
- Зализняк А., "Русская глагольная префиксация и проблемавидовой парности", Mundo Eslavo, 13, pp.19~33 (2014)
- Зализняк А., "Введение в русскую аспектологию" (2000)
- Зализняк А., "Русская аспектология: в защиту видовой пары", pp.182~191 (2015), ЯСК
- Комри Б., "Трудыаспектологичес-кого семинара филологического факультета МГУТ.1", pp.115~121 (1997), Издатель- ство МГУ
- МАС, "Словорь русского языка. В 4-х т" (1984), Русский язык
- Маслов Ю.С, "Избранные труды: Аспектология, общее языкознание" (2004), ЯСК
- Падучева Е.В., "Семантические исследования" (1996), ЯСК
- Петрухина Е.В, "Аспекутальные категории глагола в русском языкев сопоставление с чешским, словацким, польским и болгарским" (2000)
- Храковский В.С, "Аспкуальные тройки и видовые пары", Русскийязык в научном освещении, 9, pp.46~59 (2005)
- Comrie B, "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Gasparov B.M., "Verbal Aspect in Discourse" (1990), John Benjamins
- Hamburger K., "The Logic of Literature" (1973), Indiana University Press
- Janda L.A., "A Metaphor in Search of a Source Domain: The Categories of Slavic Aspect", Cognitive Linguistics, 15(4), pp.471~527 (2004)
- Kučera H., "A Semantic Model of Verbal Aspect", American Contribution to the Ninth International Congress of Slavists, 1, pp.171~184 (1983)
- Kuznetsova J, "Cognitive Linguistics Research. 53" (2015), De Gruyter Mouton
- Kuznetsova J., "Aspectual Triplets in Russian: Semantic Predictability and Regularity", Russian Linguistics, 40, pp.215~230 (2016)
- Nordrum M., "The Acpectual Triplets of Putat’: the Telicity Hypothesis and Two Ways to Test it", Russian Linguistics, 41, pp.239~260 (2017)
- Novack-Jones C., "The Semantics of Aspect and Aspects of Semantics: a Study of the Verb in Russian, Czech and English", Ph. D, pp.1992