우크라이나 야누코비치 정권 붕괴의 국내 정치ㆍ경제 요인 분석
Analysis of Domestic Political and Economic Causes of the Collapse of Yanukovich Regime in Ukraine
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the collapse of Yanukovich regime, Ukraine has plunged into a chaotic situation with the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the bloody conflicts in eastern provinces of Ukraine. Although the refusal of signing of EU Cooperation Treaty by the Yanukovich government triggered the peaceful demonstration, which eventually brought about the collapse of the regime, the fundamental causes of Yanukovich's dramatic fall are the oppressive and ill-concieved policies in domestic politics and economy. In addition to that, Yanukovich's personal shortcomings and lack of capacity as state leader have contributed to his downfall in a negative way. All these causes worked as 'intermediate causes' of the collapse of the regime, if we apply Joseph Nye's three different levels of causes of war or unexpected upheavals. First, Yanukovich did not take note of the fact that his regime had a weak political mandate from the beginning and did not try to widen the base of the political support. Instead he took coercive measures and started political oppression, imprisoning political opponents such as Tymoshenko and Lutsenko. Secondly, he did not take any effective measure to rescue the country from the economic crisis, ensuring financial assistance from Western countries and lowering the price of gas imported from Russia. As the result of these, his supporting ratio plunged to the dismal level of 10-15% just in one year after the inauguration. The wide spread corruption and the greedy accumulation of wealth by so-called Yanukovich 'family', monopolizing lucrative projects and capturing state-run enterprises, made oligarchies withdraw the support for Yanukovich regime. Although the crisis in Ukraine calls for multi-dimensional analyses, it is necessary to perceive that Yanukovich himself, more than anything else, is to blame for the collapse of the regime and Russia suffered serious setbacks twice in Ukraine, including 'the Orange Revolution', because Russia selected Yanukovich as the leader of pro-Russian camp in Ukraine.
Abstract
After the collapse of Yanukovich regime, Ukraine has plunged into a chaotic situation with the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the bloody conflicts in eastern provinces of Ukraine. Although the refusal of signing of EU Cooperation Treaty by the Yanukovich government triggered the peaceful demonstration, which eventually brought about the collapse of the regime, the fundamental causes of Yanukovich's dramatic fall are the oppressive and ill-concieved policies in domestic politics and economy. In addition to that, Yanukovich's personal shortcomings and lack of capacity as state leader have contributed to his downfall in a negative way. All these causes worked as 'intermediate causes' of the collapse of the regime, if we apply Joseph Nye's three different levels of causes of war or unexpected upheavals. First, Yanukovich did not take note of the fact that his regime had a weak political mandate from the beginning and did not try to widen the base of the political support. Instead he took coercive measures and started political oppression, imprisoning political opponents such as Tymoshenko and Lutsenko. Secondly, he did not take any effective measure to rescue the country from the economic crisis, ensuring financial assistance from Western countries and lowering the price of gas imported from Russia. As the result of these, his supporting ratio plunged to the dismal level of 10-15% just in one year after the inauguration. The wide spread corruption and the greedy accumulation of wealth by so-called Yanukovich 'family', monopolizing lucrative projects and capturing state-run enterprises, made oligarchies withdraw the support for Yanukovich regime. Although the crisis in Ukraine calls for multi-dimensional analyses, it is necessary to perceive that Yanukovich himself, more than anything else, is to blame for the collapse of the regime and Russia suffered serious setbacks twice in Ukraine, including 'the Orange Revolution', because Russia selected Yanukovich as the leader of pro-Russian camp in Ukraine.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강봉구, "우크라이나의 계산된 좌절과 "제국"의 부담", e-Eurasia, (49), pp.1~4 (2013), 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터
- 두진호, "크림반도를 중심으로 한 러시아-우크라이나 관계 연구 : 소비에트 이후 지정학적 변동을 중심으로", 군사논단, 통권 : 59, pp.110~113 (2009), 한국군사학회
- 우평균, "2013년 푸틴의 압박과 우크라이나의 EU 접근 좌절 과정", e-Eurasia, (49), pp.5~8 (2013), 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터
- 박정호, "2012년 우크라이나 총선에 대한 집합자료 분석", 국제지역연구, 17(2), pp.165~190 (2013), 국제지역연구센터
- 박정호, "우크라이나의 정치권력과 정치체제 변화: 유쉔코와 야누코비치 정권을 중심으로", 슬라브硏究, 27(3), pp.1~20 (2011), 러시아연구소
- 벤 스틸, "우크라이나 사태의 원인은 미국의 양적 완화 축소", 매일경제, ~ (2014)
- 허승철, "2010년 우크라이나 대통령 선거 분석", 러시아어문학연구논집, (34), pp.281~319 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
- 허승철, "우크라이나 현대사: 1914-2010" (2011), 고려대학교 출판부
- 허승철, "우크라이나 사태는 한반도 통일 상황의 예고편", 월간조선 (2014)
- Aslund Anders, "Payback Time for the Yanukovich 'family'", Kyiv Post, ~ (2013)
- Levitsky, S, "Competitive Authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the Cold War" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Nye, J., "Unterstanding International Conflicts: an Introduction to Theory and History", pp.77~78 (2009), Pearson and Longman
- "Constitution of Convinience of Ukraine"[URL]
- Way, L., "Why Ukraine’s Yanukovych fell, but so many analysts(including me) predicted he would survive", Washington Post, ~ (2014)
- The Guardian, "Viktor Yanukovich boasted of Ukraine corruption, says Mikheil Saakashvili", ~ (2014)
- "Kyiv Post. 2011. 10. 11", ~ (2011)
- "Kyiv Post. 2012. 2. 25", ~ (2012)
- "Kyiv Post. 2012. 4. 30", ~ (2012)
- "Soft Authoritarianism"[URL]
- "UNIAN. 2010. 12. 15", ~ (2010)
