본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우크라이나의 EU 가입 추진 과정 분석과 평가

Analysis and Evaluation of Ukraine's Approach to EU

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Since the national independence in 1991 Ukraine has sought to approach EU to become a full member of EU. However, due to internal upheaval and national discords concerning the membership of EU, Ukraine has encountered much obstacle in the road to EU. Internally, the alternation of pro-European and pro-Russian regimes has blocked establishing a consistent policy towards EU, and international situation, especially EU’s ‘expansion fatigue’ and Russia’s pressure to prevent Ukraine’s EU membership, has made it difficult for Ukraine to become a member of EU. After the collapse of Yanukovich regime, triggered by refusing to sign the Association Agreement in November 2013, the new government of Ukraine announced EU membership as one of the key foreign policy goals. Public support for EU membership in Ukraine has also increased remarkably after the so-called ‘Ukrainian crisis’. Ukraine signed with EU the political Association Agreement in March 2014 and the economic Association Agreement in June 2014, but postponed the formal enactment of economic Agreement until January 2016 under Russia’s pressure to start sanctions on the import of Ukrainian goods. Although a long-term perspective for EU-Ukraine economic integration not only offsets the loss in free trade with Russia, but also brings about more benefits for Ukraine, it is not an easy task for Ukraine to overcome current economic hardship. Recent developments in Europe, such as Dutch referendum against the Association Agreement with Ukraine, the so-called Brexit, Russia-Turkey rapprochement, IS terrorism and refugee problems, also make it difficult to predict the future of EU-Ukraine relations and the European integration itself. As long as Russia holds various means to undermine Ukraine’s efforts to join the EU, a hurried approach to EU is not recommendable for Ukraine. It is desirable for Ukraine to maintain the current relations with the EU at the Association Agreement level and to seek for a better chance to become a full member of EU. While Ukraine slows down the efforts to join NATO, it should concentrate its efforts to accomplish economic integration with EU. For the time being, this type of two-track approach, reminding the so-called ‘Finland model’, dividing political and military union with EU and economic integration, seems to be a best option for Ukraine.

Abstract

Since the national independence in 1991 Ukraine has sought to approach EU to become a full member of EU. However, due to internal upheaval and national discords concerning the membership of EU, Ukraine has encountered much obstacle in the road to EU. Internally, the alternation of pro-European and pro-Russian regimes has blocked establishing a consistent policy towards EU, and international situation, especially EU’s ‘expansion fatigue’ and Russia’s pressure to prevent Ukraine’s EU membership, has made it difficult for Ukraine to become a member of EU. After the collapse of Yanukovich regime, triggered by refusing to sign the Association Agreement in November 2013, the new government of Ukraine announced EU membership as one of the key foreign policy goals. Public support for EU membership in Ukraine has also increased remarkably after the so-called ‘Ukrainian crisis’. Ukraine signed with EU the political Association Agreement in March 2014 and the economic Association Agreement in June 2014, but postponed the formal enactment of economic Agreement until January 2016 under Russia’s pressure to start sanctions on the import of Ukrainian goods. Although a long-term perspective for EU-Ukraine economic integration not only offsets the loss in free trade with Russia, but also brings about more benefits for Ukraine, it is not an easy task for Ukraine to overcome current economic hardship. Recent developments in Europe, such as Dutch referendum against the Association Agreement with Ukraine, the so-called Brexit, Russia-Turkey rapprochement, IS terrorism and refugee problems, also make it difficult to predict the future of EU-Ukraine relations and the European integration itself. As long as Russia holds various means to undermine Ukraine’s efforts to join the EU, a hurried approach to EU is not recommendable for Ukraine. It is desirable for Ukraine to maintain the current relations with the EU at the Association Agreement level and to seek for a better chance to become a full member of EU. While Ukraine slows down the efforts to join NATO, it should concentrate its efforts to accomplish economic integration with EU. For the time being, this type of two-track approach, reminding the so-called ‘Finland model’, dividing political and military union with EU and economic integration, seems to be a best option for Ukraine.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 박정호, "CIS 지역 통합 운동에 대한 우크라이나의 입장 분석 - 관세동맹 가입 문제를 중심으로", 동유럽발칸연구, 38(1), pp.231~256 (2014), 동유럽발칸연구소
  2. 브레진스키, 즈비그뉴, "거대한 체스판" (2000), 삼인
  3. 브레진스키, 즈비그뉴, "전략적 비전" (2012), 아산정책연구원
  4. 우크라이나 사태 이후 유럽-러시아 관계, "온대원", JPI, ~, pp.JPI정책포럼 No. 2015-12
  5. 우준모, "유라시아 지역 통합체 건설에 있어서 우크라이나, 벨라루스의 전략적 선택과 한계", 국제지역연구, 18(5), pp.59~78 (2015), 국제지역연구센터
  6. 우평균, "2013 푸틴의 압박과 우크라이나의 EU 접근 과정 좌절", e-Eurasia, 49 (2013)
  7. 중소•중견 기업 유라시아지역 진출 지원 방안, "윤성학", 산업통상자원부, ~ (2014)
  8. 허승철, "우크라이나 현대사: 1914-2010" (2011), 고려대학교 출판부
  9. 허승철, "우크라이나 야누코비치 정권 붕괴의 국내 정치ㆍ경제 요인 분석", 러시아어문학연구논집, (46), pp.155~178 (2014), 한국러시아문학회
  10. 홍완석, "우크라이나의 EU 가입 전망:가능성과 한계", 국제정치논총, 48(1), pp.171~192 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
  11. 우크라이나 EU 가입 논의: 동향과 전망, "KOTRA", ~, pp.현안리포트05-004 (2015)
  12. 우크라이나 사태 장기화, 우리에게 기회인가?, "KOTRA", ~, pp.Global Market Report 15-047 (2015)
  13. Policy Impact of the Eastern Partnership on Ukraine: trade, energy and visa dialogue, "Duleba, Alexander", SFPA, ~ (2012)
  14. Duryea, Scott, "How Far Can the EU Expand?: The Dilemma of Ukrainian Membership", EU Crisis Issue 2013 Brief Paper, ~ (2013)
  15. Flikke, Geir, "Ukraine in Europe – Europe in Ukraine" (2013), Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
  16. The Expected Impact of EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, "Kravchuk, Aleksander", The Transnational Institute, ~ (2016)
  17. Kuzio, Taras, "Ukraine: Democratization, Corruption, and the New Russian Imperialism" (2016), Praeger Security International
  18. The Future of EU-Ukraine Relations: Four Scenarios, "Scenario Team EU-Ukraine 2030", Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Study, ~ (2014)
  19. Wolczuk, Kataryna, "Ukraine and the EU: turning the Association Agreement into a success story", Policy Brief, European Policy Centre, ~ (2016)
  20. "Russia needs a ‘Findand option’ for Ukraine"[URL]
  21. "Russia may be preparing ‘a long-term, game-changing move’ with Turkey"[URL]
  22. "Revisiting Ukraine’s Maidan Legacy Amist EU Shambles"[URL]
  23. "Kreml’: Pri negativnykh polsedstviiakh integratsii Ukrainy s ES Possiia primet mery"[URL]
  24. "Could Russia Play Turkey off against West?"[URL]
  25. "Public Opion Polls"[URL]
  26. "What Brexit Means to Ukraine?"[URL]
  27. "The Dutch Referendum on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: Legal options for navigating a tricky and awkward situation"[URL]
  28. "Dutch Parliament Defeats Motion To Scrap EU-Ukraine Deal"[URL]
  29. "Dutch referendum voters overwhelmingly reject closer EU links to Ukraine"[URL]
  30. "EU DEMOCRACY DEAD: EU ignores Dutch referendum to push through Ukraine deal"[URL]
  31. "In case of Dutch referendum, Ukraine just got unlucky"[URL]
  32. "Ukraine-EU Relations"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)