김수영의 다원주의 시론 연구 - <반시론>에 나타난 긴장을 중심으로

Abstract

This study aims to clarify that the core of his late poetics is pluralistic tension by analyzing in detail the representative prose of Kim Soo-young. To this end, the prose “Theory of Anti-Poetry” is regarded as the poetic notes of “Radio area”, “Dust”, “Sex”, and “Beauty”, which he named “Full Poetry” and a method of closely connecting and analyzing them He rejects transcendental poetry in the prose “Theory of Anti-Poetry” not only proposing realistic “Anti-Poetry”, but suggests a tension between “Poetry” and “Anti-Poetry”, walking like an acrobat. The core of “Theory of Anti-Poetry” is intensively contained in the word “the tension between Poetry and Anti-Poetry,” he suggested at the end. In “Theory of Anti-Poetry”, he named “Radio area”, “Dust”, “Sex”, and “Beauty” as “Full Poetry” seeking stability in real life. However, in reality, “tension” mainly appears between Anti-Poetry affirming realistic life and Poetry pursuing a transcendent spirit. He affirms realistic life in “Radio area”, while affirming the transcendental spirit in “Dust”, pursuing tension between works. On the contrary, in “Sex” and “Beauty”, the tension is pursued by presenting a balance between reality and transcendence within one work. Therefore, it can be seen that he embodied the poetics of tension not only within one work, but also among several works according to the difference in emphasis. The tension he presents is not a dialectical synthesis of the two poles, but is pluralistic in that he affirms both poles and pursues an infinite fight itself between them. Therefore, it can be concluded that Kim Soo-young’s “Theory of Anti-Poetry” is not a simple essay on Heidegger’s philosophy or irony, but a mature poetic theory that presents a poetic theory of pluralistic tension with specific works.