<關東別曲> 한역의 추이와 그 시가사적 의미 ― 兪漢宰의 『山雷關尺牘』 소재 한역시 검토를 중심으로

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to consider the aspects of the Chinese translation of Jeong Cheol(鄭澈)'s 「GwanDongByeolGok」which is a representative work of early Gasa(前期歌辭), and to examine the meaning of the Chinese translation of Gasa(歌辭). The results are as follow. All four pieces of Jeong Cheol's Gasa had been translated into Chinese over and over again, and 「GwanDongByeolGok」was translated in earliest by well-known writers. The Chinese translated poems and their relational records in 17th century show us two facts that the interest and evaluation of the day about 「GwanDongByeolGok」was great, and that various enjoying ways and accepting attitudes about the work according to translaters' tastes existed. On the contrary, Shin Seung-Gu(申昇求)'s Chinese translated poem in 19th century which has just been found and introduced let us see the translation attitude being faithful to the consciousness and content of the original work of 「GwanDongByeolGok」. I could connect both of the 17th century's and 19th century's, with the Chinese translation poem of 「GwanDongByeolGok」in 『SanRoe GwanCheokDok(山雷觀尺牘)』 which was edited by Yu Han-Jae(兪漢宰 ) in late 18th century. His translation mostly shifted 1 line of Gasa to 5 syllable 2 verse of HanSi(漢詩), and tried to vivify delicate and subtle expressions of Korean language. He emphasized to describe a scene with using easy and everyday words, though he wanted to strengthen the lyricism of poetry. We can consider it as an inclination of 18th century writers and his personal consciousness. To accept 「GwanDongByeolGok」was more various and personal in early stage, but it focused on conveying the original consciousness and content faithfully in 19th century. It may be summarized like this. The nearer it was to Jeong Cheol's creating time, the more daringly HanSi-like transformations and translaters' tastes appeared; and the later it became, the more passively they did. The translation of Korean poems into Chinese was a kind of re-creation, and it was possible for translaters to pursue their individualities and incorporate tastes by Chinese translation. I could approach the process of enjoyment and accession of Korean medieval poetry both synchronically and diachronically, by observing carefully the process that a same work of Gasa as for 「GwanDongByeolGok」had been translated into Chinese repeatedly.