<삼학역어(三學譯語)>의 만주어
Manchu language in Samhakyeke (三學譯語)
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the Manchu entries in Samhakyeke (三學譯語) of Kokumseklim (古今釋林) with a particular emphasis on the peculiar Manchu word forms. In Manchu scholarly literature, Kokumseklim is frequently mentioned in relation to Hanchengmwunkam (漢淸文鑑), but it has not been investigated as thoroughly. In this study, we compared the Manchu words in Samhakyeke to the original texts, Tongmwunyuhay and Hanchengmwunkam, in order to determine the explanations for the unusual word forms. For this study, we cross-referenced all three manuscripts of Samhakyeke and were able to identify the original or the version that was most similar to the original by analyzing the process by which notation errors occurred and were repeated. As anticipated, Samhakyeke contained no new information about the Manchu language, but it did reveal some interesting error types in transcribing Manchu forms into Hangeul, such as misspellings of Hangeul transcriptions and reassembling of symbols, which reveal an aspect of the Korean language at the time.
Abstract
This study examined the Manchu entries in Samhakyeke (三學譯語) of Kokumseklim (古今釋林) with a particular emphasis on the peculiar Manchu word forms. In Manchu scholarly literature, Kokumseklim is frequently mentioned in relation to Hanchengmwunkam (漢淸文鑑), but it has not been investigated as thoroughly. In this study, we compared the Manchu words in Samhakyeke to the original texts, Tongmwunyuhay and Hanchengmwunkam, in order to determine the explanations for the unusual word forms. For this study, we cross-referenced all three manuscripts of Samhakyeke and were able to identify the original or the version that was most similar to the original by analyzing the process by which notation errors occurred and were repeated. As anticipated, Samhakyeke contained no new information about the Manchu language, but it did reveal some interesting error types in transcribing Manchu forms into Hangeul, such as misspellings of Hangeul transcriptions and reassembling of symbols, which reveal an aspect of the Korean language at the time.
참고문헌 (13)
- 조강희, "『倭語類解』와『三學譯語』의 한자자석과 일본어음의 비교연구", 일어일문학, (28), pp.101~122 (2005), 대한일어일문학회
- 김방한, "「三學譯語」·「方言集釋」考 - 主로 蒙古語資料에 關하여 -", The Paek-San Hakpo, 1, pp.91~132 (1966)
- 김형태, "고금석림", An Annotated Bibliography of Old Books in Yonsei University Central Library, 7, pp.153~167 (2007)
- 김유범, "『同文類解』의 滿洲語 한글 표기 체계에 대하여", 민족문화연구, (58), pp.553~578 (2013), 민족문화연구원
- 고동호, "同文類解와 그 만주어 한글 표기법 검토", 알타이학보, (23), pp.23~44 (2013), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 이기문, "「古今釋林」 解題", pp.3~6 (1977), Aseyamwunhwasa
- Lee, Kyeongwon, "A preliminary study of the multilingual dictionary Gujin Shilin (Kokeum Seklim) of the Joseon Dynasty: Its compilation background, structure, content and value", Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 3(2), pp.79~86 (2019)
- 오민석, "『동문유해』 만주어 한글 표기와 만주 문자의 대응 관계 고찰 -구별 기호가 있는 한글표기를 중심으로-", 민족문화연구, (77), pp.477~515 (2017), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- 성백인, "『한청문감』에 대하여", pp.867~889 (1983), Cisiksanepsa
- 성백인, "譯學書에 나타난 訓民正音 使用-司譯院 淸學書의 만주어 한글 표기에 대하여 -", pp.367~422 (1999), Thaehaksa
- 梁伍鎭, "朝鮮時代 多重言語辭典類에 대하여", 중국어문논총, (29), pp.273~290 (2005), 중국어문연구회
- 연규동, "近代國語 語彙集 연구 : 類解類 譯學書를 중심으로", 박사, 언어학, pp.1996
- 연규동, "유해류 역학서의 종합적 검토", 국어사연구, (22), pp.7~45 (2016), 국어사학회[DOI]