본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도덕교육에서 직관과 추론의 관계 분석: 하이트와 나바이즈를 중심으로

An analysis of the relationship between intuition and reasoning in moral education: Focusing on Haidt & Narvaez

추병완
한국초등도덕교육학회 (Korean Elementary Moral Education Society)|2020.06|초등도덕교육 (KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY)|제68호|pp. 83-117|DOI 10.17282/ethics.2020..68.83

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

도덕교육도덕 심리학하이트Haidtintuition직관추론reasoningNarvaez나바이즈moral education moral psychology

초록

직관과 추론을 통합하는 도덕교육이 실행되어야 할 필요성, 특히 인격교육 모델과 도덕 추론 교육 모델의 통합 가능성에 대해 하이트와 나바이즈는 입장을 같이 하는 것처럼 보인다. 그러나 직관과 추론의 본질 및 기능에 관한 두 사람의 입장은 큰 차이점을 보인다. 도덕교육에서 직관과 추론의 관계에 관한 하이트와 나바이즈의 논거를 면밀하게 살펴보고, 두 사람이 어디에서 일치하고 어디에서 다른지를 살펴보는 것은 학문적으로 매우 중요한 탐구 과제다. 이에 이 논문은 도덕교육에서 직관과 추론의 관계에 관한 하이트와 나바이즈의 주장에서 유사점과 차이점을 분석하였다.

Abstract

With regard to the need for moral education to be implemented that integrates intuition and reasoning, particularly on the possibility of integration of character education model and moral reasoning education model, Haidt and Narvaez appear to share the same viewpoints. However, their respective positions regarding the nature and function of both intuition and reasoning differ greatly. It is an academically important exploration task to look closely at the arguments of Haidt and Narvaez on the relationship between intuition and reasoning in moral education, and where the two match and differ. Thus, this article analyzed similarities and differences in the arguments of Haidt and Narvaez on the relationship between intuition and reasoning in moral education. Importantly, since there are not enough evidences yet to empirically support their theories, we should keep in mind not to fall into the temptation of hasty generalization.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 추병완, "신경윤리학과 신경도덕교육" (2019), 한국문화사
  2. Betsch, T, "Intuition in judgment and decision making", pp.3~22 (2008), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3. Brand, C, "Dual-process theories in moral psychology: Interdisciplinary approaches to theoretical, empirical and practical consideration", pp.19~40 (2016), Springer
  4. Brown, S. R, "Moral virtue and nature" (2008), Continuum International Publishing Group
  5. Garrigan, B, "Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework", Developmental Review, 49, pp.80~100 (2018)
  6. Gilligan, C, "In a different voice" (1982), Harvard University Press
  7. Graham, J, "Ideology and intuition in moral education", European Journal of Developmental Science,, 2(3), pp.269~286 (2008)
  8. Greene, J. D., "How (and where) does moral judgment work?", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), pp.517~523 (2002)
  9. Haidt, J, "The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment", Psychological Review, 108, pp.814~834 (2001)
  10. Haidt, J, "The happiness hypothesis" (2006), Basic Books
  11. Haidt, J, "The new synthesis in moral psychology", Science, 316, pp.998~1002 (2007)
  12. Haidt, J, "Moral psychology must not be based on faith and hope: Commentary on Narvaez (2010)", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), pp.182~184 (2010)
  13. Haidt, J, "The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion" (2012), Pantheon Books
  14. Haidt, J, "Moral psychology, Vol. 2, The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity", pp.181~217 (2008), The MIT Press
  15. Haidt, J, "Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues", Daedalus, 5, pp.5~66 (2004)
  16. Haidt, J, "Intuition in judgment and decision making", pp.209~229 (2008), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  17. Kohlberg, L, "Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics" (1983), Karger
  18. Lapsley, D. K, "Moral psychology" (1996), Westview Press
  19. Lapsley, D, "Moral development, self and identity", pp.189~212 (2004), Erlbaum
  20. Narvaez, D, "Handbook of moral development", pp.703~732 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  21. Narvaez, D, "Moral psychology, Vol. 2, The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity", pp.233~240 (2008), The MIT Press
  22. Narvaez, D, "Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), pp.163~181 (2010)
  23. Narvaez, D, "What makes us moral? On the capacities and conditions for being moral", pp.239~254 (2013), Springer
  24. Narvaez, D, "Cultivating virtue: Perspectives from philosophy, theology, and psychology", pp.251~277 (2015), Oxford University Press
  25. Narvaez, D, "Embodied morality: Protectionism, engagement and imagination" (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  26. Narvaez, D, "Developing the virtues: Integrating perpectives", pp.14~33 (2016), Oxford University Press
  27. Narvaez, D, "Moral schemas and tacit judgement or how the Defining Issues Test is supported by cognitive science", Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), pp.297~314 (2002)
  28. Narvaez, D, "Moral judgment and decision making", pp.237~274 (2009), Academic Press
  29. Narvaez, D, "Empirically informed ethics: Morality between facts and norms", pp.227~238 (2014), Springer
  30. Selman, R. L, "The relation of role-taking to the development of moral judgment in children", Child Development, 42, pp.79~91 (1971)
  31. Sichel, B, "Moral education : Character, community, and ideals" (1988), Temple University Press

관련 논문AI추천

‘사회적 직관주의’가 지니는 도덕교육적 함의김민재, 박병기한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2012 · 제1권 제84호하이트(J.Haidt)의󰡐사회적직관󰡑개념의도덕심리학과도덕교육적 적용의적절성에대한연구이정렬한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2020 · 제1권 제131호도덕 교사의 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 통합적 윤리교육 모델의 의의와 한계: 나바에즈의 도덕적 전문성 교육을 중심으로한상엽한국초등도덕교육학회 · 초등도덕교육2020 · 제68호The Role of Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Decision-making문경호한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2016 · 제1권 제110호도덕 심리학 연구의 최근 동향과 도덕교육적 함의 - 헤이트(J. Haidt)의 뇌과학 연구를 중심으로 -정창우한국초등도덕교육학회 · 초등도덕교육2011 · 제37호도덕적 정체성 이론은 탈 콜버그주의인가?손경원한국철학사연구회 · 한국철학논집2011 · 제32호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

건설적 논쟁의 도덕교육적 활용 방안 연구김하연pp. 1-31도덕 교사의 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 통합적 윤리교육 모델의 의의와 한계: 나바에즈의 도덕적 전문성 교육을 중심으로한상엽pp. 33-57도덕과 교과역량 함양을 위한 융합 교육 방안 연구: 프로젝트 접근을 중심으로신호재pp. 59-82초등학교 학생들의 품성 계발을 위한 교사-학생 관계성 유형별 접근 방안 연구김태훈pp. 119-142초등학생용 도덕 딜레마 개발 연구김항인pp. 143-168
원문 보기