사회적 기업에 대한 회사법적 검토
Examination of the company law for the social company in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The social company is the company which accomplishes a profit act while pursuing a social purpose. It is self-evident today that a nation cannot be in charge of the welfare for all society fragility hierarchies under the situation that a global economic crisis comes successively, and yet is not completely solved. One alternative plan which can solve such a welfare blind spot zone is a social company. Therefore we need nomothetic supplement and the law interpretation so that it is activated a social company in a dimension of the company law. The following suggestion is a legislation in the company law and an interpretation direction for the social company in this article. At first we have a needing that designed the current commercial law restrictions rule for no voting right or voting right restrictions stocks more flexibly in the case of a social company. The second, there is the stockholder who thinks this to be contribution when acquire the stocks of the social company. Therefore we may solve this problem as if publishing the various class shares like as zero dividend stocks and dividend stocks. We have to consider whether legislative amendment to the commercial law is needed. The third, a social company are dissolved, the issue of distribution of the remaining assets occurs. It is difficult to accept so-called Non-Profit Company in the current commercial law. The nomothetic solution that can accept Non-Profit Company is required by the revision of the commercial law. The fourth, a social company, the company originally thinks of a purpose social than profit characteristics more momentously. Therefore the director in the social company gives priority to the main purpose of the company called the social purpose over profit characteristics and must carry out duties. When a director gives priority to the social purpose that is a company original purpose, and a company suffers damage from the profit-related side; the exercising of the director is not violated of the fiduciary duty(duty of care). The fifth, when a director damages the company for social purpose accomplishment (social activity), the social company, it is not become a target of the shareholder lawsuit. Because such a social purpose is a purpose prescribing in the articles of association of the company. The court will have to reject the suit when a stockholder states representative suit. The sixth, there are many problems so that the social company where is in a company form moves into action. At least we will have to put grounds rule for the corporate social responsibility in the commercial law that is the fundamental law of company.
Abstract
The social company is the company which accomplishes a profit act while pursuing a social purpose. It is self-evident today that a nation cannot be in charge of the welfare for all society fragility hierarchies under the situation that a global economic crisis comes successively, and yet is not completely solved. One alternative plan which can solve such a welfare blind spot zone is a social company. Therefore we need nomothetic supplement and the law interpretation so that it is activated a social company in a dimension of the company law. The following suggestion is a legislation in the company law and an interpretation direction for the social company in this article. At first we have a needing that designed the current commercial law restrictions rule for no voting right or voting right restrictions stocks more flexibly in the case of a social company. The second, there is the stockholder who thinks this to be contribution when acquire the stocks of the social company. Therefore we may solve this problem as if publishing the various class shares like as zero dividend stocks and dividend stocks. We have to consider whether legislative amendment to the commercial law is needed. The third, a social company are dissolved, the issue of distribution of the remaining assets occurs. It is difficult to accept so-called Non-Profit Company in the current commercial law. The nomothetic solution that can accept Non-Profit Company is required by the revision of the commercial law. The fourth, a social company, the company originally thinks of a purpose social than profit characteristics more momentously. Therefore the director in the social company gives priority to the main purpose of the company called the social purpose over profit characteristics and must carry out duties. When a director gives priority to the social purpose that is a company original purpose, and a company suffers damage from the profit-related side; the exercising of the director is not violated of the fiduciary duty(duty of care). The fifth, when a director damages the company for social purpose accomplishment (social activity), the social company, it is not become a target of the shareholder lawsuit. Because such a social purpose is a purpose prescribing in the articles of association of the company. The court will have to reject the suit when a stockholder states representative suit. The sixth, there are many problems so that the social company where is in a company form moves into action. At least we will have to put grounds rule for the corporate social responsibility in the commercial law that is the fundamental law of company.
참고문헌 (64)
- 강영기, "사회적 기업과 기업의 사회적 책임의 관련성에 관한 소고", 안암법학, (39), pp.1~38 (2012), 안암법학회
- 고용노동부, "사회적기업 활성화 방안 발표" (2011)
- 고용노동부, "사회적기업 개요집 501", 고용노동부, ~ (2011)
- 김성탁, "회사법입문" (2011), 법문사
- 김영진, "사회적 기업에 관한 비교법적 연구", 공법학연구, 12(2), pp.295~318 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
- 김재범, "주주평등의 원칙을 개관함", 안암법학, 4 (1996), 안암법학회
- 김제완, "사회적기업 육성을 위한 우리나라 법제의 현황과 개선방안", 법조, 61(5), pp.138~196 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 노희진, "사회적기업 육성을 위한 자본시장의 활용 방안", 자본시장 Weekly, (14) (2010), 한국증권연구원
- "‘집단적 임팩트’로 창조적 자본주의 열어라" (2011)[URL]
- "dongA.com News" (2011)[URL]
- 류만희, "한국의 사회적기업 특성과 발전전략에 관한 연구", 비판사회정책, (31), pp.161~191 (2011), 비판과대안을위한사회복지학회[DOI]
- 박철영, "종류주식의 활용과 법적 과제 - 의결권제한주식을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 25(4), pp.9~42 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 법무부, "상법(회사편) 해설자료", ~ (2008)
- 손영화, "CSR에 관한 합리적인 법정책의 방향 - EU의 CSR을 중심으로 -", 법과정책연구, 10(2), pp.809~836 (2010), 한국법정책학회
- 손성실, "이슈톡톡 사회적기업, 정책보다 사람이 중요하다", 인물과 사상, 166 (2012), 인물과사상사
- 송호신, "중소기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)에 대한 입법적 구현", 재산법연구, 28(4), pp.281~328 (2012), 한국재산법학회
- 안택식, "기업의 사회적 책임의 실현방향", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- 엄한진, "사회적기업 영역, 어디까지인가?" (2011), 함께일하는재단
- 양준호, "지역과 세상을 바꾸는 사회적기업-개념, 사례, 정책과제-" (2011), 두남
- 이광택, "사회적기업 지원을 위한 법제도의 개선", 법학논총, 24(3), pp.239~278 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이광택, "‘사회적기업육성법’제정 및 시행 후의 발전방향", 법학논총, 20(2), pp.33~72 (2008), 법학연구소
- 이학춘, "공공근로사업의 문제점과 개선", 東亞論叢, 36 (1999), 동아대학교
- 이회수, "사회적기업 관련법제에 관한 비교연구-영국, 이탈리아, 미국, 한국을 중심으로-", 사회적기업연구, 4(2) (2011), 단국대학교
- 이희종, "사회적기업과 주식회사", 한양법학 2012년 추계학술세미나 발표논문 (2012)
- 장영선, "울산광역시 사회적기업 지원 및 육성정책에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2010
- 정영철, "판례로 본 주주대표소송", 법학연구, 18(1), pp.339~372 (2008), 법학연구원
- 정운용, "기업의 사회적 책임 제고를 위한 입법론적 제언", 기업법연구, 25(3), pp.171~205 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 조상미, "사회적 기업 정책특징 비교분석 연구: 영국, 프랑스, 이탈리아, 한국을 중심으로", 사회복지정책, 38(2), pp.1~38 (2011), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 조영복, "사회적기업 인증결과와 과제", 사회적기업연구, 1(1) (2008), 사회적기업연구원
- 중소기업청, "보도자료 사회적기업 지원 등 중소기업기본법 개정안 공포", ~ (2011)
- 최준선, "기업의 부정과 기업의 사회적 책임", 성균관법학, 20(3), pp.871~891 (2008), 법학연구소
- 境新一, "社会的課題解決ビジネスと社会的企業に関する考察―イタリアの社会的協同組合とイギリスのコミュニティ利益会社の事例をふまえて―", 成城·経済研究, (187) (2010)
- 吉田夏彦, "｢コミュニティ利益会社｣ の法的性質 The legal nature of "Community Interest Company", 近畿大学豊岡短期大学論集, (8) (2011)
- 社会的企業についての法人制度及び支援の在り方に関する海外現地調査報告書, "内閣府 政策統括官(経済社会システム担当)委託調査", ~ (2011)
- "CSRと会社法制, 第177回公開講座"[URL]
- 北崎寛, "イギリスにおける社会的企業の理論動向に関する覚え書", 鳥取環境大学紀要, (8) (2010)
- "シリコンバレー最前線 株価至上主義に別れを告げるニュータイプの企業が誕生, IT Leaders" (2012)[URL]
- 企業の社会的責任：そのソフト·ロー化EUの現状, "ソフトロー研究", 2005, ~
- 坂田桂三, "取締役および執行役の経営判断における責任 - 企業の社会的責任․企業価値実現からの考察 -", 法律論叢, 80(2) (2008)
- "Benefit Corporation : 社会的企業に適した新たな法人格" (2012)[URL]
- Carlo Borzaga, "The Emergence of Social Enterprise" (2003), Routledge
- Work Integration Social Enterprises in the European Union: An Overview of Existing Models, "Catherine Davister", ~, pp.WP no. 04, 04
- Frank H. Easterbrook, "The Economic Structure of Corporate Law" (1991)
- "New MBAs Would Sacrifice Pay for Ethics, The Daily Stat" (2011)[URL]
- Jonathan D. Springer, "Corporate Constituency Statutes: Hollow Hopes and False Fears", ANN. SURV. AM. L, 1999, pp.85~95 (1999)
- Judd F. Sneirson, "Doing Well by Doing Good: Leveraging Due Care for Better, More Socially Responsible Corporate Decisionmaking", CORP. GOVERNANCE L. REV, 3, pp.438~448 (2007)
- Matthew F. Doeringer, "Fostering Social Enterprise: A Historical and International Analysis", Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20, pp.291~313 (2010)
- "Passing Legislation"[URL]
- Paul Webley, "Commitment Among Ethical Investors: An Experimental Approach", J. ECON. PSYCHOL, 22, pp.27~ (2001)
- "Regulator of CMTY. Interest Cos., Community Interest Companies: Frequently Asked Question 11", ~ (2009)
- Robert Wexler, "Social Enterprise: A Legal Context", Exempt Org. Tax Rev, 54, pp.233~244 (2006)
- "Comparison Chart Comparison of "Regular Corporation", A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, A California Flexible Purpose Corporation and A California Benefit Corporation"[URL]
- "Massachusetts Passes Legislation Recognizing Benefit Corporations" (2012)[URL]
- Shaun Martin, "Encumbered Shares", U. ILL. L. REV, 2005, pp.775~ (2005)
- Steven J. Haymore, "Public(ly oriented) Companies: B Corporations and the Delaware Stakeholder Provision Dilemma", Vand. L. Rev, 64, pp.1311~1342 (2011)
- Steven J. Schueth, "Socially Responsible Investing in the U.S.", J. Bus. Ethics, 43, pp.189~ (2003)
- Steven Munch, "Improving the Benefit Corporation: How Traditional Governance Mechanisms Can Enhance the Innovative New Business Form", Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 7 (2012)
- "New Corporate Forms: Flexible Purpose Corporations, Benefit Corporations, and L3Cs"[URL]
- Susan Mac Cormac, "New Corporate Forms: One Viable Solution to Advancing Environmental Sustainability", Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(2) (2012)
- "The Bar Association of San Francisco Volunteer Legal Service System, Benefit Corporations and Flexible Purpose Corporations in California: New State Legislation Permits Socially Responsible Corporate Formations"[URL]
- "The Regulator Of CMTY. Interest Cos., Incorporating A New Community Interest Company 21, 26", ~ (2008)
- "What is a benefit corporation?"[URL]
- "The Benefit Corporation: A Business Corporation Committed to Creating Public Benefit"[URL]
- Why It Is the Legal Form that Best Addresses the Needs of Social Entrepreneurs, Investors, and, Ultimately, the Public, "William H. Clark, Jr.", Need and Rationale for the Benefit Corporation, ~ (2011)