본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회적 기업과 기업의 사회적 책임의 관련성에 관한 소고

A Study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and social enterprise

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Social enterprise is a new business model was born in order to solve the unemployment and public interest issues arising from the contradictions of capitalist society, in the presence of a certain order to return to society the most of the revenue, and to contribute to society. It is not to hire for corporate activities, an organization that is working to employ, is where the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the existence of this social enterprise is a concern. If say roughly, for the reason for social enterprises has emerged here, have not played a general corporate that is a social existence, have a social responsibility as corporate citizen. Originally, members of society should play a responsible for the survival and maintaining of the entire community. and then, It appeared to be a social enterprise to play a role so that instead of the general corporate. And if so, if you play decent social responsibility of corporate as a corporate citizen, the survival and maintenance of the entire community is carried out smoothly, and the current existence of a form of social enterprise will become unnecessary. Thus, the need for discipline by the configuration logical theories about corporate social responsibility comes increased. Conditions necessary for such resolution is as follow: First, the original purpose of the enterprise in accordance with company business with the autonomy to lead, but in the realization of social justice, corporate citizenship is required to perform duties faithfully, To do this, first of all, this requires the formation of a Consensus of community members on the first corporate citizen. Second, the traditional corporate social responsibility have been discussed mainly the large companies. But I think it should be applied regardless of the scale of the company. Of course, there would be difference of content and extent of social responsibility, if that contains the contents of awareness of social responsibility to the heart of the business enterprise to carry out, the need for classification by the size of the company for less, corporate social responsibility is need to recognized and to expand it until the contents, including small and medium enterprises. Third, in recent Europe there is a movement to try to provide a framework for a single concept of corporate social responsibility through the integration of traditional debate. If a single logical system is provided, as expected norms of influence will increase. Results of the review, but may be disciplined by legislation if necessary, in case it is difficult to apply the law, you are able to apply corporate social responsibility. and then, I think it can be resolved through the recognition if corporate social responsibility is used as the norm would be possible, as like soft law as a kind of behavioral principles on corporate social responsibility. Under this perception, but a little rough overview of the words, corporate social responsibility is the responsibility of the company on a contract that should be borne as a member of the entire community, regardless of whether the provision of legal. In cases where the said provisions on corporate social responsibility by law, shall ensure responsibilities as a corporate citizen. Of course, if the contents of the responsibility of the directors as set forth on the form of legal provisions, which can be resolved as a matter of breach of duty of directors. And also, through the construction of the internal control system of the company, it could lead to link company law and corporate social responsibility, for example, through the form of norms soft law, consistent with social justice for the maintenance and survival of the entire community social responsibility can lead to results that would. As a result, corporate social responsibility, at least, it is able to be expected to function through the form of soft law, to act as the norm for sustainable survival and maintenance of entire community and company. As far as can be interpreted in this way, be said corporate social responsibility is a matter of law area.

Abstract

Social enterprise is a new business model was born in order to solve the unemployment and public interest issues arising from the contradictions of capitalist society, in the presence of a certain order to return to society the most of the revenue, and to contribute to society. It is not to hire for corporate activities, an organization that is working to employ, is where the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the existence of this social enterprise is a concern. If say roughly, for the reason for social enterprises has emerged here, have not played a general corporate that is a social existence, have a social responsibility as corporate citizen. Originally, members of society should play a responsible for the survival and maintaining of the entire community. and then, It appeared to be a social enterprise to play a role so that instead of the general corporate. And if so, if you play decent social responsibility of corporate as a corporate citizen, the survival and maintenance of the entire community is carried out smoothly, and the current existence of a form of social enterprise will become unnecessary. Thus, the need for discipline by the configuration logical theories about corporate social responsibility comes increased. Conditions necessary for such resolution is as follow: First, the original purpose of the enterprise in accordance with company business with the autonomy to lead, but in the realization of social justice, corporate citizenship is required to perform duties faithfully, To do this, first of all, this requires the formation of a Consensus of community members on the first corporate citizen. Second, the traditional corporate social responsibility have been discussed mainly the large companies. But I think it should be applied regardless of the scale of the company. Of course, there would be difference of content and extent of social responsibility, if that contains the contents of awareness of social responsibility to the heart of the business enterprise to carry out, the need for classification by the size of the company for less, corporate social responsibility is need to recognized and to expand it until the contents, including small and medium enterprises. Third, in recent Europe there is a movement to try to provide a framework for a single concept of corporate social responsibility through the integration of traditional debate. If a single logical system is provided, as expected norms of influence will increase. Results of the review, but may be disciplined by legislation if necessary, in case it is difficult to apply the law, you are able to apply corporate social responsibility. and then, I think it can be resolved through the recognition if corporate social responsibility is used as the norm would be possible, as like soft law as a kind of behavioral principles on corporate social responsibility. Under this perception, but a little rough overview of the words, corporate social responsibility is the responsibility of the company on a contract that should be borne as a member of the entire community, regardless of whether the provision of legal. In cases where the said provisions on corporate social responsibility by law, shall ensure responsibilities as a corporate citizen. Of course, if the contents of the responsibility of the directors as set forth on the form of legal provisions, which can be resolved as a matter of breach of duty of directors. And also, through the construction of the internal control system of the company, it could lead to link company law and corporate social responsibility, for example, through the form of norms soft law, consistent with social justice for the maintenance and survival of the entire community social responsibility can lead to results that would. As a result, corporate social responsibility, at least, it is able to be expected to function through the form of soft law, to act as the norm for sustainable survival and maintenance of entire community and company. As far as can be interpreted in this way, be said corporate social responsibility is a matter of law area.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR): 국제논의동향 및 우리의 대응방안, "고동수", 산업연구원, ~, pp.Issue Paper 2006-198 (2006)
  2. 고재종, "기업의 사회적 책임 경영과 이사의 책임에 대한 고찰", 暻園法學, 3(2) (2010)
  3. 곽관훈, "계속기업(Going Concern)의 관점에서 본 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 회사법", 한양법학, (34), pp.155~177 (2011), 한양법학회
  4. 곽관훈, "기업가치향상을 위한 규제방안 - Soft Law를 중심으로-", 상사판례연구, 24(1), pp.101~129 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
  5. 국찬표, "기업의 사회적 책임, 지배구조 및 기업가치", 한국증권학회지, 40(5), pp.713~748 (2011), 한국증권학회
  6. 권중원, "LIG손해보험 CSR 경영사례를 통해 본 손해보험사의 CSR: 기업의 사회적 책임", 손해보험, 통권 : 497 (2010), 손해보험협회
  7. 권한용, "기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 국제적 논의와 법적 과제", 동아법학, (53), pp.717~752 (2011), 법학연구소
  8. 김분태, "다국적기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 연구 -다국적기업의 자율규제를 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.649~690 (2010), 법학연구소
  9. 김성수, "企業의 社會的 責任(CSR)의 理論的 變遷史에 관한 硏究", 기업경영연구, 16(1), pp.1~25 (2009), 한국기업경영학회
  10. 김성은, "남강 이승훈 선생을 통해 본 기업의 사회적 책임", 경영법률, 21(2), pp.195~210 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
  11. 김성탁, "(사례) 주식회사법" (2006), 영남대학교 출판부
  12. 김영만, "CSR 경영의 글로벌 동향 및 동부화재의 CSR", 손해보험, 통권 : 499 (2010), 손해보험협회
  13. 김준환, "노사의 사회적 책임, 한국적 모형 모색해야 -일자리문제 해결위한 사회적 책임", 월간 노동법률, 247 (2011), (주)중앙경제
  14. 김창수, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업가치", 한국증권학회지, 38(4), pp.507~545 (2009), 한국증권학회
  15. 노희진, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 사회책임투자(SRI)", 기업지배구조리뷰, 통권 : 45 (2009), 한국기업지배구조센터
  16. 박오순, "기업의 사회적 책임으로서 환경에 관한 연구", 比較法硏究, 9(2) (2009), 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所
  17. 반혜정, "지배구조에 따른 기업의 사회적책임과 기업성과", 산업경제연구, 22(5), pp.2171~2195 (2009), 한국산업경제학회
  18. 송호신, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)에 대한 배경과 회사법적 구현", 한양법학, (29), pp.141~171 (2010), 한양법학회
  19. 송호신, "중소기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)에 대한 입법적 구현", 재산법연구, 28(4), pp.281~328 (2012), 한국재산법학회
  20. 辛東燦, "사회적으로 책임 있는 프로젝트 파이낸스 : Equator Principle에 관한 小考", 기업지배구조리뷰, 통권 : 47 (2009), 한국기업지배구조센터
  21. 안택식, "기업의 사회적 책임론과 회사법의 변화", 재산법연구, 28(3), pp.383~416 (2011), 한국재산법학회
  22. 양만식, "기업의 윤리경영과 사회적 책임", 기업법연구, 24(1), pp.245~275 (2010), 한국기업법학회
  23. 양만식, "사회적 책임투자와 기업지배구조", 기업법연구, 24(2), pp.197~229 (2010), 한국기업법학회
  24. 양은영, "국내 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 행동 분석 : 지속가능성 보고서를 중심으로", 社會科學論叢, 28 (2009), 漢陽大學校 出版部
  25. 유병선, "보노보혁명-제4섹터, 사회적 기업의 아름다운 반란" (2007), 부키
  26. 유병필, "기업의 역할이 커져야 자본주의 위기극복", Biz & Media(기업 & 미디어), 116 (2012), (주)기업앤미디어
  27. 이동승, "기업의 사회적 책임 - 법적 규제의 한계와 과제를 중심으로 -", 안암법학, (29), pp.299~333 (2009), 안암법학회
  28. 이동승, "주주의 지위 -주주중심주의의 비판적 고찰-", 경영법률, 20(2), pp.325~360 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
  29. 이상복, "기업지배구조와 기업의 사회적 책임의 수렴", Corporate Governance Review, 통권 : 56 (2011), 한국기업지배구조원
  30. 이상수, "기업의 사회적 책임 맥락에서 본 유노칼 판결의 의미", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.185~216 (2011), 법학연구소
  31. 이은선, "사회적 기업의 특성에 관한 비교 연구: 영국, 미국, 한국을 중심으로", 행정논총, 47(4), pp.363~397 (2009), 한국행정연구소
  32. 장덕조, "企業의 社會的 責任 -會社本質論을 中心으로-", 상사법연구, 29(2), pp.83~132 (2010), 한국상사법학회
  33. 전영길, "기업의 사회적 책임과 사회책임투자: 기업, 사회의 책임 있는 구성원으로 바뀌어야", 金融界= The financial world, 46(2) (2011)
  34. 전형배, "기업의 사회적 책임과 산업안전보건", 법조, 59(10), pp.144~185 (2010), 법조협회
  35. 정동윤, (2001), 법문사
  36. 정운용, "기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 기본적 인식의 전환", 기업과 법무, 1 (2011), 한국기업법무협회
  37. 정운용, "업무상배임죄에 있어서 경영판단의 원칙", 경영법률, 20(1), pp.311~343 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  38. 정운용, "기업의 사회적 책임 제고를 위한 형법정책", 박사, pp.2010
  39. 정찬형, "회사법강의(제2판)" (2002), 박영사
  40. 정희철, "이른바 기업의 사회적 책임과 법적 제문제, In 기업법의 전개" (1979), 박영사
  41. 조경희, "정의실천하면 기업가치도 UP", Biz & Media(기업 & 미디어), 110 (2011), (주)기업앤미디어
  42. 최영진, "기업의 사회적 책임과 기업의 평판 - 도요타와 현대차의 비교 연구 -", 사회과학연구, 17(2), pp.194~238 (2009), 사회과학연구소
  43. 한철, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 기업지배구조", 상사판례연구, 22(3), pp.313~338 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
  44. 한국ILO협회, "企業의 社會的責任(CSR) 어디까지 論議되고 있나: 그 背景에 있는 經營戰略과 持續可能한 企業’", 國際勞動(International labor), 통권 : 145 (2009), 韓國ILO協會
  45. 野村修也, "企業の社会的責任, In 会社法の争点" (2009), 有斐閣
  46. 加賀田和弘, "企業の社会的責任(CSR) : その歴史的展開と今日的課題", KGPS (Kwansei Gakuin Policy Studies) review, 7 (2006), 関西学院大学大学院総合政策研究科
  47. 岡本享二, "CSR 入門 「企業の社会的責任」とは何か" (2004), 日本経済新聞社
  48. 菱山隆二, "倫理ㆍコンプライアンスとCSR : 企業の社會的責任(第2版)" (2009), 經濟法令硏究會
  49. 多田雅彦, "CSR(企業の社会的責任)の本質からはずれたCSR, In 明治大学経営学部公共経営学科 2006年度卒業論文" (2006)
  50. 大島和夫, "企業の社會的責任 : 地域ㆍ勞動者との共生をめざして" (2010), 學習の友社
  51. 神作裕之, "企業の社会的責任:そのソフトロー化? EUの現状", ソフトロー研究, (2) (2005), 東京大学大学院法学政治学研究科 21世紀COE「国家と市場の相互関係におけるソフトロー」事務局
  52. 河本一郎, "企業の社会的責任-法学的考察", ジュリスト, (578) (1975), 有斐閣
  53. 河本一郎, "現代会社法 (新訂第1版)" (1980), 商事法務研究会
  54. みずほ總合硏究所 CSRコンサルティング, "CSRマネジメントコントロ-ル : 企業と社會をつなぐ3つの仕組み" (2009), 麗澤大學出版會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)