주주의 열람청구권에 대한 일고찰
A Study on Shareholder’s inspection Rights of books and records of the corporation
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the large-sized corporation system of today, Shareholders are not involved in the management of the company, the Board is to enforce the company's business. The shareholders are play the role of a management supervisor. Shareholders with respect to the illegal management of the Board of Directors, inspection rights about books and records of the corporation have been recognized as a typical way of obtaining the information of the company. The United States, Japan, and our country, the provisions of inspection rights about books and records of the corporation, there are some differences. For a more workable, it is necessary that the current Commercial Code provisions be amended. With reference to the US and Japanese law and case, it is presented for at least three of the amendments, such as the following. First, inspection rights of shareholders about books and records of the corporation have become a minority shareholder rights 3 of 100 of the total issued shares by the possibility of abuse. This rights have the character of as basic information area for the other shareholder rights exercise, such as a representative litigation of shareholders. However, derivative action when considering that it is a one-hundredth, it is necessary to alleviate the minority exercise requirements by a factor of at least 1 of 100 of the total issued shares. Second, when the shareholders to exercise, such as inspection rights about books and records, the Commercial Code in connection with the so-called proper purpose is not provided with the provisions of the expressly. It must be resolved by the interpretation. However, it is clearly defined the limits of such a proper purpose in the law there is a meaning. If you want the exercise of inspection rights about books and records as the exercise of minority shareholder’s rights, it is considered to be so as not to unduly denied. On the other hand, for the exercise of undue inspection rights about books and records, it is believed that the corporation can reject this. There is a need to clarify the role to clearly adjust the interests of minority shareholders and the corporation by the legislation. Third, the case of the current inspection rights about books and records, in spite of the provisional disposition decision in court, there is very often substantially way that the corporation can interfere or rejected it. Just delaying the least inspection time corporation can obtain a substantial benefit. The court, in the case of such provisional disposition application for the inspection rights about books and records, it is necessary to admit the more aggressive indirect coercion. Try to expect a change in the positive court attitude.
Abstract
In the large-sized corporation system of today, Shareholders are not involved in the management of the company, the Board is to enforce the company's business. The shareholders are play the role of a management supervisor. Shareholders with respect to the illegal management of the Board of Directors, inspection rights about books and records of the corporation have been recognized as a typical way of obtaining the information of the company. The United States, Japan, and our country, the provisions of inspection rights about books and records of the corporation, there are some differences. For a more workable, it is necessary that the current Commercial Code provisions be amended. With reference to the US and Japanese law and case, it is presented for at least three of the amendments, such as the following. First, inspection rights of shareholders about books and records of the corporation have become a minority shareholder rights 3 of 100 of the total issued shares by the possibility of abuse. This rights have the character of as basic information area for the other shareholder rights exercise, such as a representative litigation of shareholders. However, derivative action when considering that it is a one-hundredth, it is necessary to alleviate the minority exercise requirements by a factor of at least 1 of 100 of the total issued shares. Second, when the shareholders to exercise, such as inspection rights about books and records, the Commercial Code in connection with the so-called proper purpose is not provided with the provisions of the expressly. It must be resolved by the interpretation. However, it is clearly defined the limits of such a proper purpose in the law there is a meaning. If you want the exercise of inspection rights about books and records as the exercise of minority shareholder’s rights, it is considered to be so as not to unduly denied. On the other hand, for the exercise of undue inspection rights about books and records, it is believed that the corporation can reject this. There is a need to clarify the role to clearly adjust the interests of minority shareholders and the corporation by the legislation. Third, the case of the current inspection rights about books and records, in spite of the provisional disposition decision in court, there is very often substantially way that the corporation can interfere or rejected it. Just delaying the least inspection time corporation can obtain a substantial benefit. The court, in the case of such provisional disposition application for the inspection rights about books and records, it is necessary to admit the more aggressive indirect coercion. Try to expect a change in the positive court attitude.
참고문헌 (90)
- 곽병훈, "주주의 회계장부 열람, 등사청구권", 사법연구자료, 25 (1999), 법원도서관
- 김대연, "모회사 주주의 자회사 회계장부열람권", 법조, 52(6) (2003), 법조협회
- 김대연, "지배·종속회사에 관한 연구(Ⅰ) : 지배회사 주주의 종속회사 회계장부열람권을 중심으로", 법학연구, 43(1) (2002), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 김재범, "회사경영정보의 수집에 관한 주주의 권리", 고시연구, 29(5) (2002)
- 김재형, "일본 판례 평석: 회계장부열람청구의 거부사유로서의 ‘실질적인 경쟁관계’ - 樂天 대 TBS 회계장부 등 열람․등사 청구 사건 -", 법학논총, 16(1), pp.253~276 (2009), 법학연구원
- 김재형, "지배회사 주주의 종속회사 회계장부열람권 - Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. George D.Orloff -", 법학논총, 17(1), pp.387~415 (2010), 법학연구원
- 김진철, "주주의 장부열람청구권의 행사요건에 관한 연구 - 미국법상 장부열람청구권의 정당한 목적을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 24(4), pp.121~152 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
- 송민호, "제남 강위두박사 화갑기념 상사법논총(상)" (1996), 형설출판사
- 안동섭, "신세기 회사법의 전개" (1996)
- 윤은경, "주주의 회계장부열람청구권의 활용 및 그 한계 -우호적 M&A시 주식발행회사 노조의 실사 비협조시를 중심으로-", 홍익법학, 14(1), pp.701~723 (2013), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 왕순모, "회계의 장부 및 서류의 열람청구권", 상사판례연구, 9 (1998), 한국상사판례학회
- 이병태, "주주의 경리검사권", 법조, 23(8) (1974)
- 이상원, "주주의 경리검사권", 재판자료, 38 (1987), 법원행정처
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2015), 박영사
- 임재연, "주주명부 열람권에 관한 연구 - 미국회사법상 “정당한 목적” 요건을 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (105), pp.44~80 (2008), 한국법학원
- 임재연, "미국회사법" (2007), 박영사
- 전휴재, "회계장부 등 서류의 열람등사 가처분에 관한 실무상의 논점", 저스티스, (87), pp.103~119 (2005), 한국법학원
- 정경영, "상법학강의" (2007), 박영사
- 최준선, "주주의 회계장부열람권", 성균관법학, 13(1) (2001)
- 최문희, "최근 일본의 주요 회사법 판례의 논점", BFL, (34) (2009), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 최병규, "소수주주의 권리강화를 위한 제도 개선방안 -회계장부열람청구권을 중심으로-", 경영법률, 20(2), pp.297~324 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
- 홍복기, "신세기 회사법의 전개" (1996)
- 황근수, "미국에서 持株會社의 운영과 株主保護", 법학연구, (53), pp.335~363 (2014), 한국법학회
- Ballantine, "On Corporations" (1946), Challaghan and Company
- Bartels, "Inspection of Corporate Books and Records in New York by Stockholders and Directors", Cornell L.Q, 38, pp.289~ (1953)
- Blumberg, "The Law of Corporate Groups-Procedural Problems in the Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations" (1983), Aspen Law ＆ Business
- Browning Jeffries, "Shareholder Access to Corporate Books and Records: The Abrogation Debate", DRAKE L. REV, 59, pp.1087~ (2011)
- Ellen S. Friedenberg, "The Delaware Courts and “Books and Records” Demands: A Corporate Lawyer’s Perspective", Corporate Governance Advisor, 12(5) (2004)
- Folk, III, "Corporation Law Developments 1969", Va. L. Rev, 56, pp.775~ (1970)
- Franklin Balotti, "The Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organizations" (2014)
- Henn, "Laws of Corporations" (1983), West Publishing Co
- J. Watson, "Protecting the Shareholder’s Right to Inspect the Share Register in Corporate Proxy Contests for the Election of Directors", Cal. L. Rev, 50S, pp.1273~ (1977)
- Jeffrey J. Clark, "Recent developments in Delaware corporate law: Compaq Computer Corp. v. Horton： A straight forward, clarifying, statutory interpretation of section 220(b) and (c)", Del. J. Corp. L, 20, pp.622~ (1995)
- M. Goldman, "Delaware Corporation Law̶ Shareholders’ Right to Make an Informed Judgement", Bus. Law, 32, pp.1805~ (1977)
- "Note, 18 La. L. Rev. 337", ~ (1985)
- Randall S. Thomas, "Using State Inspection Statutes for Discovery in Federal Securities Fraud Actions", B.U.L. REV, 77, pp.69~ (1997)
- Randall S. Thomas, "Improving Shareholder Monitoring of Corporate Management by Expanding Statutory Access to Information", Arizona Law Review, 38, pp.331~ (1996)
- Ruari James O'Sullivan, "Note: Skimming from the 2%: The Status of Georgia'S Resrictions on Shareholder Access to Corporate Information", Ga. L. Rev, 46, pp.835~ (2012)
- Uwe Hüffer, "Aktiengestz, 8" (2008), Aufl
- 江頭憲治郎, "新会社法制定の意義", ジュリスト, (1295) (2005)
- 江頭憲治郎, "株式会社法" (2006), 有斐閣
- 江頭憲治郎, (2008), 青林書院
- 改正商法研究会, "会社法運用の実態とその分析", 商事法務, (604) (1972)
- 経済産業省, "企業価値·株主共同の利益の確保又は向上のための買収防衛策に関する指針", ~ (2005)
- 高橋公忠, "会計帳簿閲覧権の濫用と請求拒否事由", 九州産業大学商経論叢, 38(4) (1998)
- 高橋公忠, "蓮井良憲先生·今井宏先生古稀記念 企業監査とリスク管理の法構造" (1994), 法律文化社
- 髙木康衣, "(判例評釈) 株主が株式会社に対し、取締役らの業務執行によって会社に多額の損害が生じた疑いがあると主張して、商法293条の6第1項に基づき､会計帳簿及び会計資料の閲覧謄写を求めて提訴し、認められた事例", 九州国際大学法学会 法学論集, 15(1) (2008)
- 髙木康衣, "最近の判例における会計帳簿閲覧請求の拒絶をめぐる問題", 九州国際大学法学論集, 15(3) (2009), 九州国際大学
- 霍 麗艶, "中国上場会社における支配株主の責任と少数派株主の保護", 四天王寺大学紀要, (59) (2015), 四天王寺大学
- 久保田光昭, "帳簿·書類閲覧謄写権について(一)", 上智法学, 32(二·三合併) (1989)
- 久保田光昭, "株主の帳簿·書類閱覽權", 私法, (58) (1996)
- 近藤光男, "会計帳簿閲覧·謄写請求と競業会社", 商事法務, (1356) (1994)
- 吉戎修一, "会社法改正作業の現況について", 商事法務, (1299) (1992)
- 大隅健一郎, "新版会社法 中巻" (1992), 有斐閣
- 大隅健一郎, "新版会社法論中巻Ⅱ" (1983), 有斐閣
- 大隅健一郎, "会社法詳論(上巻)" (1991), 有斐閣
- 東京地裁商事部研究会報告, "商事保全および非訟事件の実務研究 帳簿等閲覧当社仮処分", 判例時報, (1296) (1988)
- 藤原俊雄, "判批", 金融·商事判例, (1272) (2007)
- 藤田祥子, "帳簿閲覧権について一最高裁判平成16年 7月 1日判決を契機として一", 経営経理研究, (75) (2005)
- 藤井利雄, "演習会社法" (1983), 有斐閣
- 鈴木竹雄, "新版会社法" (1994), 弘文堂
- 鈴木竹雄, "会社法" (1994), 有斐閣
- 龍田節, "会社法大要" (2007), 有斐閣
- 木俣由美, "アメリカにおける株主名簿·会計帳簿閲覧請求権をめぐる問題と行使状況について - R. S. Thomasによるデラウェア州会社法セクション二二〇関連ケースのリサーチより -", 産大法学, 39(3·4) (2006), 京都産業大学法学部
- 相澤哲 ほか, "新会社法の解説(10) 株式会社の計算等", 旬刊商事法務, (1746) (2005)
- 相澤哲, "一問一答新·会社法" (2005), 商事法務
- 西山芳喜, "菅原菊志先生古稀記念論集·現代企業法の理論" (1998)
- 西澤利夫, "最近の最高裁判例の動向調査(2)~平成14年以降６年を振り返る~", 立法と調査, (285) (2008)
- 小橋一郎, "株式会社法講座 4巻" (1957), 有斐閣
- 松田二郎, "条解株式会社法下" (1952), 弘文堂
- 水島治, "純粋持株会社における ｢実質的に競争関係にある事業｣ ―純粋持株会社と会計帳簿閲覧謄写請求権―", 立命館法学, (2315) (2007)
- 岸田雅雄, "株主の会計帳簿閲覧請求に関する諸問題", 代行リポート, (108) (1994)
- 岩原紳作, "株主の帳簿閲覧請求で閲覧目的を具体的に特定すべきか", ジュリスト, (1056) (1994)
- 玉井利幸, "《判例評釈》 会計帳簿等の閲覧謄写請求の可否最高裁判所 平成一六年七月一日第一小法廷判決平成一五年(受) 第1104号 会計帳簿閲覧謄写, 株主総会議事録等閲覧謄写, 社員総会議事録等閲覧謄写請求事件", 一橋論叢, 133(1) (2005), 一橋大学
- 原菊志, "株主の解説請求権の法律的考察", 法学志林, 59(2) (1962), 法政大学法学志林協会
- 伊沢孝平, "注解新会社法(改訂版)" (1951), 法文社
- 田中誠二, "四全訂コンメンタール会社法" (1984), 勁草書房
- 田中誠二, "三全訂 会社法詳論下巻" (1994), 勁草書房
- 正井章筰, "株主の帳簿閲覧請求権の行使をめぐる問題点", 判例タイムズ, (917) (1996)
- 中東正文, "判批", 判例タイムズ, (948) (1997)
- 志谷匡史, "閉鎖的会社における会計帳簿等の閲覧謄写請求", ビジネス法務, 4(10) (2004), 中央経済社
- 志谷匡史, "閉鎖的会社における会計帳簿等の閲覧謄写請求", ビジネス法務, 4(10) (2004), 中央経済社
- 泉田栄一, "会社法の論点研究" (2005), 信山社
- 青木英夫, "商法293条ノ６に基づく法人税確定申告所の控え及び案の閲覧及び謄写を求める仮処分申請が却下された事例", 金融·商事判例, (837) (1992)
- 土本清幸, "東京証券取引所における適時開示政策の変遷", 現代ディスクロージャー研究, (7) (2007), JARDIS 日本ディスクロージャー研究学会
- 坂本延夫, "帳簿書類の閲覧謄写をする株主が代表取締役となっている会社が商法293条ノ7第2号所定の｢会社ト競業ヲ為ス会社｣に当たるとして右請求が許されないとされた事例", 金融·商事判例, (954) (1994)
- 豊岳信昭, "帳簿閲覧請求の対象となる会計帳簿·資料の意義" (2006), 会社判例百選
- 和久友子, "会社法大系 3" (2008), 青林書院
- 和座一清, "新注釈会社法⑼" (1988), 有斐閣
- 黒沼悦郎, "帳簿閲覧請求権", 民商法雑誌, 108(4·5) (1993)