중국의 상계관세제도와 실행에 관한 연구- 미국산 방향성 전기강판에 대한 상계관세 판정을 중심으로-
A Study on China’ System and Practice Regarding Countervailing Duties
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Along with increased countervailing duty investigations that China is confronted with in foreign exports and the gradual establishment of the perfect market economic position of China, the effect of countervailing measures regarding partial industries has already transformed from potential threats to realistic losses. Import nations simultaneously use the two methods of anti-dumping and countervailing measures with other safeguard measures, and provide serious effects to the export firms of China while putting on brakes in exports of Chinese products. China had not imposed countervailing duties on any item until the year 2009, and adopts a defensive stance regarding this matter. However, change is brought on such stance of China by the imposition of countervailing duties on 10 and 6 cases from other member nations in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Such change appears after the Chinese Ministry of Commerce launches countervailing duty investigation regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel in June 1, 2009. China clarified the will to protect the domestic industries by actively using countervailing duties with the decision to continuously impose counter- vailing duties regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel and chicken products in 2010. China’s legal system of countervailing duties has been formed by constructing State Council administrative regulations, departmental rules of State Council administrative institution, and judicial interpretation of Supreme People's Court into basic structure. This article has examined China’ countervailing duty laws and related decision content focused on countervailing duty investigation and decision regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel, the first case of countervailing duty imposition by China.
Abstract
Along with increased countervailing duty investigations that China is confronted with in foreign exports and the gradual establishment of the perfect market economic position of China, the effect of countervailing measures regarding partial industries has already transformed from potential threats to realistic losses. Import nations simultaneously use the two methods of anti-dumping and countervailing measures with other safeguard measures, and provide serious effects to the export firms of China while putting on brakes in exports of Chinese products. China had not imposed countervailing duties on any item until the year 2009, and adopts a defensive stance regarding this matter. However, change is brought on such stance of China by the imposition of countervailing duties on 10 and 6 cases from other member nations in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Such change appears after the Chinese Ministry of Commerce launches countervailing duty investigation regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel in June 1, 2009. China clarified the will to protect the domestic industries by actively using countervailing duties with the decision to continuously impose counter- vailing duties regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel and chicken products in 2010. China’s legal system of countervailing duties has been formed by constructing State Council administrative regulations, departmental rules of State Council administrative institution, and judicial interpretation of Supreme People's Court into basic structure. This article has examined China’ countervailing duty laws and related decision content focused on countervailing duty investigation and decision regarding American grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel, the first case of countervailing duty imposition by China.
참고문헌 (10)
- 마 광, "중국법의 연원 연구", 인권과 정의, (3) (2009)
- 최송자, "대중국 무역구제 신 동향 및 중국의 보조금제도에 미치는 영향", 국제거래법연구, 14(2), pp.189~210 (2005), 국제거래법학회
- 顧功耘, "WTO框架下中國的補貼與反補貼制度定位分析", 政治與法律, (2) (2003)
- 歐福永, "借鑒國際先進經驗, 完善我國反補貼立法之初探", 世界貿易組織動態與硏究, (6) (2006)
- 商務部公平貿易局, "中國首例‘雙反’案: 電工鋼反傾銷反補貼案解讀", 中國經貿, (5) (2010)
- 宋才發, "WTO規則與中國反補貼立法", 河北法學, (4) (2004)
- 孫南申, "中國反補貼規則與SCM規則的差異分析與衝突解決", 華東政法學院學報, (2) (2007)
- 袁古潔, "WTO《SCM協議》與我國反補貼法律體系的發展", 華南師範大學學報(社會科學版), (4) (2003)
- 趙立韜, "我國反補貼原則及對策初探", 河北法學, (10) (2007)
- WTO, "China–Countervailing and Anti-dumping Duties on Grain Oriented Flat-rolled Electrical Steel from the United States: Request for Consultations by the United States, WT", DS414, pp.2010, ~
