본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WTO의 상계관세 및 반덤핑관세 관련 미국-중국 WTO 철강분쟁사건(DS 414)에 대한 고찰

A Study on U.S.-China WTO Steel Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Dispute(DS 414)

김상만
안암법학회 (Anam Law Association)|2014.01|안암법학 (Anam Law Review)|제43호|pp. 1165-1200|DOI 10.22822/alr..43.201401.1165

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

WTO상계관세(countervailing duty)반덤핑관세(anti-dumping duty)미국-중국간 철강분쟁(U.S. - China steel dispute)보조금협정(the SCM Agreement)반덤핑협정(the Anti-Dumping Agreement)분쟁해결기구(the Dispute Settlement BodyDSB)DS414

초록

The duty payable on an imported goods may be increased above that normally required by the posted tariff schedule by countervailing duty or anti-dumping duty. A subsidy shall be deemed to exist if there is a financial contribution by a government and a benefit is thereby conferred. Dumping involves exporting goods at lower price than the price used to sell the same goods in a domestic market. An importing country imposes anti-dumping duty on the dumped-goods to protect its domestic industry. WTO was established as a product of the Uruguay Round, which was successfully completed in 1994. WTO provides a system for settling international trade dispute through the Dispute Settlement Body("DSB") There are five stages in the resolution of disputes under WTO: ⅰ) Consultation ⅱ) Panel establishment, investigation, and report, ⅲ) Appellate review of the panel report, ⅳ) Adoption of the panel and appellate decision, and ⅴ) Inplementation of the decision. China imposed countervailing and anti-dumping duties on grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel from the United States. The measures were imposed by China's Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) and the United States claimed that they were inconsistent with China's commitments and obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the SCM Agreement and the GATT 1994. On 25 March 2011, the DSB established a panel under the request by the United States. The Panel upheld the United States' claims with respect to initiation of certain countervailing duty investigations, with respect to MOFCOM's price effects analysis, and with respect to MOFCOM's causation analysis, and circulated the panel report on 15 June 2012(DS 414). China appealed to the Appellate Body certain issues of law and legal interpretations covered in the panel report. The Appellate Body upheld the Panel’s report and circulated the appellate body report on 18 October 2012. On 16 November 2012, the DSB adopted the Appellate Body report and the panel report. On 3 May 2013, the arbitration report on the reasonable time for China's implementation of the DSB recommendations and rulings.

Abstract

The duty payable on an imported goods may be increased above that normally required by the posted tariff schedule by countervailing duty or anti-dumping duty. A subsidy shall be deemed to exist if there is a financial contribution by a government and a benefit is thereby conferred. Dumping involves exporting goods at lower price than the price used to sell the same goods in a domestic market. An importing country imposes anti-dumping duty on the dumped-goods to protect its domestic industry. WTO was established as a product of the Uruguay Round, which was successfully completed in 1994. WTO provides a system for settling international trade dispute through the Dispute Settlement Body("DSB") There are five stages in the resolution of disputes under WTO: ⅰ) Consultation ⅱ) Panel establishment, investigation, and report, ⅲ) Appellate review of the panel report, ⅳ) Adoption of the panel and appellate decision, and ⅴ) Inplementation of the decision. China imposed countervailing and anti-dumping duties on grain oriented flat-rolled electrical steel from the United States. The measures were imposed by China's Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) and the United States claimed that they were inconsistent with China's commitments and obligations under the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the SCM Agreement and the GATT 1994. On 25 March 2011, the DSB established a panel under the request by the United States. The Panel upheld the United States' claims with respect to initiation of certain countervailing duty investigations, with respect to MOFCOM's price effects analysis, and with respect to MOFCOM's causation analysis, and circulated the panel report on 15 June 2012(DS 414). China appealed to the Appellate Body certain issues of law and legal interpretations covered in the panel report. The Appellate Body upheld the Panel’s report and circulated the appellate body report on 18 October 2012. On 16 November 2012, the DSB adopted the Appellate Body report and the panel report. On 3 May 2013, the arbitration report on the reasonable time for China's implementation of the DSB recommendations and rulings.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김상만, "불공정무역에 대한 규제수단으로서의 탄력관세제도에 대한 소고", 조세와 법, 5(1) (2012)
  2. 김상만, "반덤핑관세 부과의 요건인 “피해의 판정”에 대한 연구(미국-중국간 철강분쟁사건에 대한 WTO 판정(DS414)을 중심으로)", 조세와 법, 6(1), pp.227~248 (2013), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
  3. 김인숙, "WTO 紛爭解決制度에 관한 考察- 패널 및 上訴機構의 審議權限과 限界를 中心으로 -", 국제법학회논총, 48(3), pp.4~122 (2003), 대한국제법학회
  4. 김인숙, "WTO 분쟁해결절차상 보복조치의 문제와 개선방안", 통상법률, (96), pp.42~77 (2010), 법무부
  5. 김태명, "우리나라 관세정책ㆍ제도의 변천 및 향후과제", 경영사학, 23(2), pp.157~185 (2008), 한국경영사학회
  6. 노승혁, "우리나라 산업피해구제제도 및 운용에 관한 일고찰", Trade Remedy Review (2006)
  7. 박노형, "WTO체제의 분쟁해결제도 연구" (1996), 박영사
  8. 박덕영, "WTO 분쟁해결제도 15년의 평가와 향후과제", 통상법률, (90), pp.8~43 (2009), 법무부
  9. 박형래, "국제통상 분쟁사례의 이해" (2010), 청람
  10. WTO 보조금 연구, "법무부", ~ (2003)
  11. WTO 분쟁해결제도의 이행과정 연구, "법무부", ~ (2002)
  12. 성영화, "미국-브라질 WTO 면화보조금 분쟁에 관한 사례연구", 통상법률, (92), pp.81~119 (2010), 법무부
  13. 이제홍, "불공정무역에 따른 무역구제제도의 반덤핑관세에 관한 연구", 무역보험연구, 11(4) (2010)
  14. 이종민, "관세수준 결정과 WTO 분쟁해결제도의 역할에 관한 소고", 무역학회지, 28(3), pp.351~374 (2003), 한국무역학회
  15. 이환규, "WTO 분쟁해결 이행절차에 관한 연구 : 합리적 이행기간을 중심으로", 국제경제법연구, 7(2) (2009)
  16. 鄭在完, "한국의 탄력관세제도 운용상 문제저과 정책과제", 무역학회지, 27(4), pp.241~261 (2002), 한국무역학회
  17. 정해관, "WTO 분쟁해결분야 논의 동향", KDI 나라경제, ~ (2005)
  18. 조영정, "국제통상법의 이해 제3판" (2009), 무역경영사
  19. 최광수, "WTO 분쟁해결체제에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2007
  20. Andreas F. Lowenfeld, "International Economic Law, 2nd ed" (2008), Oxford Press
  21. Belay Seoum, "Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures, 2nd ed." (2009), Routledge
  22. Carole Murray, "Schmitthoff's Export Trade : The Law And Practice Of International Trade, 11th ed." (2010), London Steven & Sons
  23. David Palmer, "Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization, 2d ed." (2004), Cambridge University Press
  24. John E. Ray, "Managing Official Export Credits" (1995), Institute for International Economics Washington
  25. Peter Malanczuk, "Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th ed" (2002), Routeledge
  26. Ralph H. Folsom, "Principles of International Business Transactions, Trade and Economic Relations" (2005), West Group
  27. WTO, "WT", DS414, L, pp.927
  28. WTO, "G", SCM, 1[DOI]
  29. WTO, "G", ADP, 1(20 September 2010), 2010[DOI]
  30. WTO, "WT", DS414, pp.2012, ~
  31. WTO, "WT", DS414, Add.1(15 June 2012), 2012[DOI]
  32. WTO, "WT", DS414, R(18 October 2012), 2012[DOI]
  33. WTO, "WT", DS414, pp.2013, ~
  34. Panel Reports, US - Offset Act(Byrd Amendment), "WTO", ~
  35. WTO, "Guatamala - Cement", ~
  36. Panel Report, US - Softwood Lumber, "WTO", ~
  37. Appellate Body Report, US - Hot Rolled Steel, "WTO", ~

관련 논문AI추천

반덤핑관세 부과의 요건인 “피해의 판정”에 대한 연구(미국-중국간 철강분쟁사건에 대한 WTO 판정(DS414)을 중심으로)김상만서울시립대학교 법학연구소 · 조세와 법2013 · 제6권 제1호중국의 상계관세제도와 실행에 관한 연구－ 미국산 방향성 전기강판에 대한 상계관세 판정을 중심으로－마광안암법학회 · 안암법학2011 · 제35호한미 철강분쟁사건(WTO DS488 판정-유정용강관(OCTG))에 대한 고찰김상만법학연구소 · 아주법학2018 · 제12권 제3호AD/CVD 이중부과조치에 관한 미․중 WTO분쟁사례 연구차경자, 최성일한국경제통상학회 · 경제연구2012 · 제30권 제4호중국산 철강재에 대한 EU 반덤핑관세부과에 관한 WTO 사례연구 - 유럽연합 반덤핑규칙 제9(5)조 해석을 중심으로 -조현숙한국무역보험학회 · 무역금융보험연구2012 · 제13권 제1호중국과 주요 무역대상국간 보조금 분쟁에 관한 연구권진택, 손성문대한중국학회 · 중국학2010 · 제35호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)

헌법과 소수자 보호이준일pp. 1-29한국사회에서 인권의 변동 － 세계화, 제도화, 지역화 －홍성수pp. 31-75情報提供的 申告로서의 集會申告의 公法的 意義에 관한 小考김중권pp. 77-108형사제재로서 몰수와 추징에 관한 제안－ ‘몰수추징면탈죄’의 도입 논의를 중심으로 －하민경pp. 109-135헌법규정이 사적 법률관계에서 고려될 수 있는 한계백경일pp. 137-196
원문 보기