중국과 주요 무역대상국간 보조금 분쟁에 관한 연구
A Study on Disputes of Subsides and Countervailing Measures between United States of America, Canada and China
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Developed countries especially United States of America(USA) and Canada hadn't taken any Countervailing Measures(CVM) against China before 2004, because they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country, and they thought NME country didn't exist the market price, and it is difficult their to calculate or apply the CVM rate in NME country. But China was invoked by Canada and USA with anti-subsidies investigation since April 2004 still they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country. So this paper will mainly analyze the case concerning among China, USA and Canada anti-subsidies investigations against China in the Special Import Measures Act(SIMA) in Canada, United States Countervailing Duty Law(USCVD) in USA, WTO SCM Agreement, and discuss the substantive claims of contracting parties, and find the problems of Chinese subsidy system and Chinese granted' WTO SCM Agreement. Through these cases, Chinese government should adjust its domestic industrial system and subsidy system which will lead to international disputes especially prohibited subsidies.
Abstract
Developed countries especially United States of America(USA) and Canada hadn't taken any Countervailing Measures(CVM) against China before 2004, because they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country, and they thought NME country didn't exist the market price, and it is difficult their to calculate or apply the CVM rate in NME country. But China was invoked by Canada and USA with anti-subsidies investigation since April 2004 still they regarded China as a non-market economy(NME) country. So this paper will mainly analyze the case concerning among China, USA and Canada anti-subsidies investigations against China in the Special Import Measures Act(SIMA) in Canada, United States Countervailing Duty Law(USCVD) in USA, WTO SCM Agreement, and discuss the substantive claims of contracting parties, and find the problems of Chinese subsidy system and Chinese granted' WTO SCM Agreement. Through these cases, Chinese government should adjust its domestic industrial system and subsidy system which will lead to international disputes especially prohibited subsidies.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강인수, "국제통상론" (2000), 박영사
- 박형래, "산업피해구제와 대외무역법" (2006), 도서출판 두남
- 권진택, "중국의 대한국 반덤핑조치 증가요인에 관한 연구", 중국학, (30), pp.405~429 (2008), 대한중국학회
- 노광, "WTO체제하에서의 중국보조금제도에 대한 법적연구", 무역구제, (30) (2008), 무역구제위원회
- 박민규, "중국 보조금 제도에 관한 연구", 통상법률, (73), pp.73~97 (2007), 법무부
- 손성문, "중국의 개정 반보조금조례가 향후 한 중 통상관계에 미치는 영향", 진주산업대학교 논문집, 48 (2009), 진주산업대학교
- 이윤희, "중국의 철강산업 육성정책과 보조금 이슈", 무역구제, (35) (2009), 무역구제위원회
- 이정표, "중국의 신 반덤핑조례의 특징과 그 한계에 관한 고찰", 무역학회지, 31(1), pp.85~110 (2006), 한국무역학회
- 최송자, "대중국 무역구제 신 동향 및 중국의 보조금제도에 미치는 영향", 국제거래법연구, 14(2), pp.189~210 (2005), 국제거래법학회
- 对外贸易经济合作部世界贸易组织司, "中国加入世界贸易组织法律文件" (2002), 法律出版社
- 蔡春林, "补贴与反补贴措施协议研究" (2007), 对外经济贸易大学出版社
- 蔡镇顺, "反倾销与反补贴法研究" (2006), 中上大学出版社
- 邹琪, "反补贴与中国产业安全" (2006), 上海财政大学出版社
- 单一, "WTO框架下补贴与反补贴法律制度与事务" (2009), 法律出版社
- 李本, "补贴与反补贴制度分析" (2005), 北京大学出版社
- 欧副永, "国际补贴与反补贴立法与实践比较研究" (2008), 中国方正出版社
- 彭岳, "贸易补贴的法律规制" (2007), 法律出版社
- 赵维田, "中国入世议定书条款解读" (2005), 湖南科学技术出版社
- 王琴华, "补贴与反补贴问题研究" (2002), 中国经济出版社
- 叶全良, "国际商务与反补贴" (2005), 人民出版社
- 胡江峰, "WTO与我国反补贴立法", 山西財經大學學報, 24 (2002)
- Challenges and Choices to Apply Countervailing Duties to China, "U.S.-China Trade", United States Government Accountability Office, ~, pp.GAO-06-608T (2006)
- "United States Trade Rights Enforcement Act", Expresses the sense of Congress about making the countervailing duty law under the Tariff Act of 1930 (1930)
- "WT", DS368, L, pp.826 G, SCM[DOI]
- "Federal Register", Vol. 72, No. 206, Notices 60647, 2007[DOI]
- "4214-16 AD", 1373, 4218-24 CV, pp.2008, ~
- "4214-16 AD", 1373, 4218-24 CV, pp.2008, ~