제2차 개정 중국민사소송법에 관한 소고
A Study on the Second Amendment of China Civil Procedural Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China Civil Procedural Law was adopted in 1991 and underwent its first amendment in 2007. But the 2007 amendment was left insufficient because it had only focused on trial supervision and executive procedure. In this background, the legislature of China carried out the second Amendment on August 31, 2012 and made a considerable modification compared to the first amendment. The second amendment introduced new provisions including principle of good faith, public interest litigation, small claims, a third party’s right to cancel an unfair action, injunction, releasing court decisions to the public, the procedure of confirming intermediation agreement and security right exercise. Meanwhile, there are also modifications to regulations on jurisdiction, evidence, summary procedure, special procedure, trial supervision procedure, executive procedure and foreign litigations. In this article, we will learn the contents of above amendments, among which 10 significant modifications will be particularly explained in details and compared to the Korean counterparts. By such a comparative research, we try to give an estimation of the achievements of the 2012 amendment and point out the problems that need to be improved in the future.
Abstract
China Civil Procedural Law was adopted in 1991 and underwent its first amendment in 2007. But the 2007 amendment was left insufficient because it had only focused on trial supervision and executive procedure. In this background, the legislature of China carried out the second Amendment on August 31, 2012 and made a considerable modification compared to the first amendment. The second amendment introduced new provisions including principle of good faith, public interest litigation, small claims, a third party’s right to cancel an unfair action, injunction, releasing court decisions to the public, the procedure of confirming intermediation agreement and security right exercise. Meanwhile, there are also modifications to regulations on jurisdiction, evidence, summary procedure, special procedure, trial supervision procedure, executive procedure and foreign litigations. In this article, we will learn the contents of above amendments, among which 10 significant modifications will be particularly explained in details and compared to the Korean counterparts. By such a comparative research, we try to give an estimation of the achievements of the 2012 amendment and point out the problems that need to be improved in the future.
참고문헌 (23)
- 정동윤, "민사소송법" (2009), 법문사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2009), 박영사
- 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2009), 세창출판사
- 유병현, "우리나라 ADR의 발전방향", 안암법학, 1(22) (2006)
- 유병현, "ADR의 발전과 법원외 조정의 효력", 법조, 53(6), pp.27~72 (2004), 법조협회
- 손한기, "중국민사소송법의 기본원칙", 한국민사소송법학회지, 1 (1998)
- 김주, "개정 중국 민사소송법의 주요 내용과 향후 과제 - 심판감독절차와 집행절차를 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (379)통권 : 379, pp.159~171 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- 대체적 분쟁처리제도(ADR)의 도입방안, "전병서", 사법제도개혁추진위원회, ~ (2005)
- 김상영, "韓國의 少額事件審判制度", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.417~451 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이상돈, "공익소송과 인권실현‐공익소송의 법이론적 분석과 법정책적 전망", 기업연구소송, 2 (2005)
- 함영주, "북한 민사소송법과 중국 민사소송법의 상호관련성에 관한 고찰", 민사소송, 10(1), pp.177~204 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
- 吴高盛, "中华人民共和国民事诉讼法”释义及实用指南" (2012), 中国民主法治出版社
- 王胜明, "中华人民共和国民事诉讼法释义" (2012), 法律出版社
- 张卫平, "新民事诉讼法中的新制度", 中国法律, (05) (2012)
- 廖中洪, "小额诉讼救济机制比较研究", 现代法学, 34(5) (2012)
- 洪冬英, "当代中国调解制度的变迁研究", 박사, pp.2007
- 刘学在, "小额案件一审终审制之质疑", 中国审判, (06) (2012)
- 吴兆祥, "新民事诉讼法出台的背景及其重大影响", 中国法律, (05) (2012)
- 张晓茹, "检察机关参与民事诉讼的方式探讨", 公民与法, (09) (2012)
- 汤维建, "民事诉讼法全面修改的若干重点研判及立法建议", 苏州大学学报, (03) (2012)
- 李轩, "律师视角下的《民事诉讼法》修改", 国家检察官学院学报, 19(5) (2011)
- 江伟, "民事诉讼中的行为保全初探", 政法论坛 (中国政法大学学报), (3) (1994)
- 张争辉, "浅议民事执行检察监督", 法制与经济, (324) (2012)
