본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

징계의 본질에 대한 소고

Review on the nature of official reprimand

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this review is to describe the explanations of the nature of official reprimand through the analysis on the features of contract employment, meaning of corporative order and the structural characteristics of official reprimand along with contract responsibility. The obligations of labors based on labor contract are determined in general while labor contract settlement and then those obligations are determined in details according to employment rule, labor collective agreement, custom of labor relations, employer's directions etc. The employment relations are made individually, however, mostly it shows the features of collective labor offer so that it is necessary for the employers to organize employees effectively for better execution. Since the employment relations shows the features as personal relationships and continuous reliable relationships that are dependent on mutual reliance between employer and employee, the importance of additional meanings of obligations except provision obligations. It is necessary for the users to organize the corporative order in order to accomplish the efficient business goals and these are embedded based on the regulations such as employment rule. In terms of labor relations, the executors of corporative order regulations are only to be the employees so that the contents of corporative orders consist of the obligations on employees according to contract employment. Therefore, the meanings of corporative order are the regulations that embody the obligations of employees on employer pertaining to contract employment so that the meanings of violation of corporative order can be regarded as the violation of obligations of employees on contract employment. The official reprimand has the characteristics of both one-sided and comprehensiveness. The user can ask the responsibilities of those employees who violate the corporative order by executing the official reprimand as another party of contract employment. Also, the official reprimand of employer can be comprehensive in terms of the views for rights of establishment of official reprimand policy, subjects of reprimand and the measures of reprimand. Since the formation of employer's order regulation cannot be integral, those matters that had not been set as order regulations previously can be subjects for official reprimands. In addition, the measures of assorted official reprimands can be fully explained by responsibilities of contract. Summing up these conditions, the nature of official reprimand can be considered as contract responsibility. Besides, the legal basis that acknowledge the rights of reprimand for employer is the contract employment. Based on the contract employment, the official reprimand is the right that is given to employer who is the another party of the contract. It is also important to execute the study to maintain the labor standard act to protect labors and acquire the equality of labor relations by limiting the one-sided and comprehensiveness of employer's reprimand. Based on the natures and structures of official reprimands in this study, it is necessary to understand the issues that are related with reasons and measures of assorted official reprimands and processes.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to describe the explanations of the nature of official reprimand through the analysis on the features of contract employment, meaning of corporative order and the structural characteristics of official reprimand along with contract responsibility. The obligations of labors based on labor contract are determined in general while labor contract settlement and then those obligations are determined in details according to employment rule, labor collective agreement, custom of labor relations, employer's directions etc. The employment relations are made individually, however, mostly it shows the features of collective labor offer so that it is necessary for the employers to organize employees effectively for better execution. Since the employment relations shows the features as personal relationships and continuous reliable relationships that are dependent on mutual reliance between employer and employee, the importance of additional meanings of obligations except provision obligations. It is necessary for the users to organize the corporative order in order to accomplish the efficient business goals and these are embedded based on the regulations such as employment rule. In terms of labor relations, the executors of corporative order regulations are only to be the employees so that the contents of corporative orders consist of the obligations on employees according to contract employment. Therefore, the meanings of corporative order are the regulations that embody the obligations of employees on employer pertaining to contract employment so that the meanings of violation of corporative order can be regarded as the violation of obligations of employees on contract employment. The official reprimand has the characteristics of both one-sided and comprehensiveness. The user can ask the responsibilities of those employees who violate the corporative order by executing the official reprimand as another party of contract employment. Also, the official reprimand of employer can be comprehensive in terms of the views for rights of establishment of official reprimand policy, subjects of reprimand and the measures of reprimand. Since the formation of employer's order regulation cannot be integral, those matters that had not been set as order regulations previously can be subjects for official reprimands. In addition, the measures of assorted official reprimands can be fully explained by responsibilities of contract. Summing up these conditions, the nature of official reprimand can be considered as contract responsibility. Besides, the legal basis that acknowledge the rights of reprimand for employer is the contract employment. Based on the contract employment, the official reprimand is the right that is given to employer who is the another party of the contract. It is also important to execute the study to maintain the labor standard act to protect labors and acquire the equality of labor relations by limiting the one-sided and comprehensiveness of employer's reprimand. Based on the natures and structures of official reprimands in this study, it is necessary to understand the issues that are related with reasons and measures of assorted official reprimands and processes.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김형배, "노동법" (2007), 박영사
  2. 김유성, "노동법(수정판)" (2006), 법문사
  3. 임종률, "노동법" (2011), 박영사
  4. 이병태, "최신노동법" (2008), 중앙경제사
  5. 박홍규, "고용법․근로조건법" (2005), 삼영사
  6. 이정, "일본노동법" (2007), 법문사
  7. 하경효, "징계해고의 정당사유와 절차에 관련된 문제", 조정과 심판, (6) (2001)
  8. 이흥재, "해고의 절차적 제한, In 절차적 정의와 법의지배" (2003), 박영사
  9. 金紹英, "解雇事由에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.1992
  10. 박원석, "경력사칭과 징계해고, In 연구논총" (1985), 건국대 행정대학원
  11. 박지순, "징계제도의 법적구조 및 개별쟁점의 재검토", 노동법포럼, 1(1) (2008), 노동법이론실무학회
  12. 박종희, "사단의 구성원에 대한 통제권의 법적기초와 사법심사의 범위", 안암법학 (1998), 안암법학회
  13. 송호영, "所屬社員에 대한 團體의 懲戒權에 관한 硏究", 재산법연구, 26(2), pp.1~33 (2009), 한국재산법학회
  14. 방준식, "사용자 지시권에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2006
  15. 방준식, "징계해고규제법리의 재검토", 강원법학, 35, pp.183~208 (2012), 강원대학교비교법학연구소
  16. 권혁, "해고․해고사유․해고동기", 노동법학, (22), 한국노동법학회
  17. 이승욱, "징계처분의 범위와 한계, In 노동판례비평" (1997), 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임
  18. 임종률, "근로자징계의 법리", 법학논총 (1990), 숭실대학교

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)