论中国民事诉讼程序的启动
Research on Civil Procedure’s startup in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The characteristics of the startup of civil procedure in China are as follows. First, it provides for strict elements to limit the party to file a civil action. Second the Court can append the third party without the party’s application. Third, the 2012 amendments to the Civil Procedure of China, also give the right to start the civil public interest litigation to the government agencies. The elements of filing an action determine the scope of the dispute dealt by the court. In this paper, by analyzing the existing problems of the civil procedure’s startup, the author thinks that China should enhance the independent status and authority of the courts. Under this premise, China should reduce the elements of filing a civil action, and put the right as a constitutionally protected right. China should abolish the terms that the court can append a third party ex officio. Instead, China should enhance joint action system. As in Chinese society " government is strong, and citizens are weak ", as well as the independent status of the courts and the lack of authority, China shall postpone giving the government agencies the power to file public interest litigation, and the development of public interest litigation should mainly rely on community organizations.
Abstract
The characteristics of the startup of civil procedure in China are as follows. First, it provides for strict elements to limit the party to file a civil action. Second the Court can append the third party without the party’s application. Third, the 2012 amendments to the Civil Procedure of China, also give the right to start the civil public interest litigation to the government agencies. The elements of filing an action determine the scope of the dispute dealt by the court. In this paper, by analyzing the existing problems of the civil procedure’s startup, the author thinks that China should enhance the independent status and authority of the courts. Under this premise, China should reduce the elements of filing a civil action, and put the right as a constitutionally protected right. China should abolish the terms that the court can append a third party ex officio. Instead, China should enhance joint action system. As in Chinese society " government is strong, and citizens are weak ", as well as the independent status of the courts and the lack of authority, China shall postpone giving the government agencies the power to file public interest litigation, and the development of public interest litigation should mainly rely on community organizations.
참고문헌 (22)
- 江伟, "民事诉讼法专论" (2005), 人民大学出版社
- 黄学贤, "行政公益诉讼研究" (2008), 中国政法大学出版社
- 载傅郁林, "民事司法制度的功能与结构" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 李曙光, "转型法律学" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
- 颜运秋, "公益诉讼理念研究" (2002), 中国检察出版社
- 孙汉琦, "중국민사소송의 관할제도에 관한 연구", 민사소송 (2002)
- 汪建成, "论司法的权威与权威的司法", 法学评论, 4 (2001)
- 张卫平, "起诉要件与实体判决要件", 法学研究, 6 (2004)
- 裴小梅, "对涉法上访问题的理性思考", 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2 (2005)
- 程金华, "中国行政纠纷解决的制度选择——以公民需求为视角", 中国社会科学, 6 (2009)
- 于建嵘, "中国信访制度批判", 中国改革(综合版), 2 (2005)
- 朱春涛, "试论确定民事主管范围的基本原则", 河北法学, 12 (2006)
- 韩涛, "论司法权的有限性与我国社会转型时期法院民事主管制度的新建构", 석사
- 张卫平, "起诉难:一个中国问题的思索", 法学研究, 6, pp.65~ (2009)
- 陇夫, "尊重司法的理由", 法制日报, ~ (1999)
- 章武生, "我国无独立请求权第三人制度的改革与完善", 法学研究, 3 (2006)
- 孔金萍, "中国环境公益诉讼的发展——以设立环保法庭的地区为中心", 中国法研究 (2012), 韩中法学会
- 林莉红, "法社会学视野下的中国公益诉讼", 学习与探索, 1 (2008)
- "“环保执法被停职”暴露权力制约软肋"[URL]
- "国内首份信访报告获高层重视"[URL]
- "修修补补解决不了环境问题:须完善法律"[URL]
- "民事诉讼要件与审查程序——以民事审判权的范围为核心"[URL]
