국가와 개인, 어떻게 얼마나, 양립가능한가
How and How much the State and the Individual can be compatible?
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Why the individual should yield to a political order? Why the State interfere in life of the individual? These questions make a comprehensive question. That is the question, 'How and How much the State and the Individual can be compatible?' This question consists in three questions. 1) Why the individual should obey a ruler? 2) Why the individual transfer his natural rights to the sovereignty? 3) Why the absolute power is to give to legislature, not a ruler? These three questions is connected to one question, "Is the individual really free?" The answer is, "He is really free if he could have the liberty of thought and discussion." That freedom is a necessary condition in order to remove an established order. The individual ought to take out new discourses to construct new political order. Only the freedom of thought and discussion can ensure new discourses on new political order. Discussing new order, we can ask, "Have the State secured the life and the freedom of individuals?" The Answer is, "No." By the time, the State as a centralized system of government had nothing to with the life and freedom of individuals. So this centralized system of government is to be disjoined. And then, a new order have to be discussed. Perhaps a small community as a new order might be chosen. But that order is not to be ideological, to let the individual live as human, not a national people.
Abstract
Why the individual should yield to a political order? Why the State interfere in life of the individual? These questions make a comprehensive question. That is the question, 'How and How much the State and the Individual can be compatible?' This question consists in three questions. 1) Why the individual should obey a ruler? 2) Why the individual transfer his natural rights to the sovereignty? 3) Why the absolute power is to give to legislature, not a ruler? These three questions is connected to one question, "Is the individual really free?" The answer is, "He is really free if he could have the liberty of thought and discussion." That freedom is a necessary condition in order to remove an established order. The individual ought to take out new discourses to construct new political order. Only the freedom of thought and discussion can ensure new discourses on new political order. Discussing new order, we can ask, "Have the State secured the life and the freedom of individuals?" The Answer is, "No." By the time, the State as a centralized system of government had nothing to with the life and freedom of individuals. So this centralized system of government is to be disjoined. And then, a new order have to be discussed. Perhaps a small community as a new order might be chosen. But that order is not to be ideological, to let the individual live as human, not a national people.
참고문헌 (37)
- 더글러스 러미스, "경제발전이 안 되면 풍요롭지 못할 것인가" (2000), 녹색평론사
- 막스베버, "소명으로서의 정치" (2011), 폴리테이아
- 장동진, "현대자유주의 정치철학의 이해" (2001), 동명사
- 하승우, "연방주의 개헌이 필요하다", 녹색평론, (127) (2012), 녹색평론사
- 플라톤, "국가" (2012), 서광사
- 안건훈, "현대철학과 사회" (1992), 서광사
- 최용철, "이기주의론" (2011), 간디서원
- Ackerman, B. A., "Social Justice in the Liberal State" (1980), Yale Univ., Press
- Raphel, D. D., "Problems of Political philosophy" (1970), Macmillan
- 정일준, "현대성과 홀로코스트" (2013), 새물결
- Bauman, Z., "새로운 빈곤" (2010), 천지인
- Berlin, I., "Four Essays on Liberty" (1969), Oxford Univ., Press
- Bowie, N., "The Individual and the Political Order" (1977), Prentice- Hall
- David, J., "The Idea of A Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconstruct- ion" (1994), Princeton Univ., Press
- Hobbes, "Leviathan" (1991), Cambridge Univ., Press
- Hospers, J., "인간행위론" (1993), 간디서원
- Hamilton, E., "Plato 2" (1961), Pinceton Univ., Press
- Hurka, T., "Indirect Perfectionism : Kymlicka on Liberal Neurality", Journal of Political Philosophy, 3(1) (1995)
- King, H. M., "Societal Issues, Scientific Viewpoints" (1976), American Institute of Physics
- Lakoff, G., "도덕 정치를 말하다" (2010), 김영사
- Locke, J., "통치론: 시민정부의 참된 기원, 범위 및 그 목적에 관한 시론" (1996), 까치
- MacIntyre, A., "After Virtue" (1981), Univ., of Notre dame Press
- Marcuse, H., "One Dimensional Man" (1964), Beacon Press
- Martin, H., "세계화의 덫" (1997), 영림카디널
- Mill, J. S., "자유론" (2005), 책세상
- Nikiforuk, A., "에너지 노예, 그 반란의 시작" (2013), 황소자리
- Nozick, R., "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" (1974), Basic Books
- Popper, K. R., "열린사회와 그의 적들" (1995), 민음사
- 오지은, "덕과 지식, 그리고 행복" (2010), 서광사
- Raz, J., "The Morality of Freedom" (1986), Oxford Univ., Press
- Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Harvard Univ., Press
- Skidelsky, R., "얼마나 있어야 충분한가" (2013), 부·키
- Smith, A., "An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nation, Vol. I, II, ed." (1976), Clarendon Press
- Thoureau, H. D., "시민 불복종" (2010), 이레
- 백영경, "유토피스틱스" (1999), 창작과 비평사
- Wolff, R. P., "In Defence of Anarchism" (1970), Harper & Row
- Walzer, M., "Interpretation and Social Criticism" (1987), Harvard Univerity Press