본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소말리아해적에 대한 국제법적 규제와 그 한계

International Legal Framework Applicable to Somali Pirates and Limitation of Their Regulation

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Maritime piracy disrupts international navigation and trade and threatens the lives and property of people of many nations. Several international organizations including the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the International Maritime Organization and the European Union have been actively engaged in addressing this grave problem. Navies from the EU and NATO and from several countries, including the United States, Russia, India, Japan and South Korea, have deployed their warships off the coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden to protect trade routes because of the recent upsurge of attacks on ships by Somali Pirates. This Article endeavors to establish a framework for individual nations and the international community to respond to pirate attacks in Somali coastal waters. Because many acts of piracy occur initially on the high seas outside Somalia's territorial waters, these acts fall most prominently within the scope of the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention(LOS) and the United Nations Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA). Accordingly, when permissible, individual nations falling victim to pirate attacks should seek to arrest and prosecute pirates in their national courts under these principal maritime conventions. To address the challenge posed by pirates, the United Nations Security Council has adopted several resolutions authorizing states to take the necessary actions to combat piracy, including in the territorial waters of Somalia. Norms prescribed under several conventions including the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention(UNCLOS), maritime law, and domestic laws of various states provide for jurisdiction by states to prosecute and punish pirates. By the way, current domestic, regional and international legal frameworks fail to adequately combat the nature and scale of maritime piracy. Until now, states and international legal institutions have addressed the piracy problem through a series of conventions, treaties, resolutions and regional agreements. Without a uniform, comprehensive legal framework, states have attempted to tackle piracy as best they can. These limited approaches highlight the deficiencies of international anti-piracy instruments. Thus there is a need for a definitive, international, body of law to systematically govern this field. This article is divided into five parts. Part I is the introduction. Part II briefly reviews the political situation and piracy activities of Somalia. Part III explores the legal framework applicable to piracy and a review of the wide range of international and regional responses to prevent and deter acts of piracy and punish the pirates. Part IV examines the operations which have been coordinated by NATO, the EU, and a coalition led by the United States, in addition to several countries operating on their own. The concluding Part V contains the limitation on the regulation of piracy by international law and the recommendations.

Abstract

Maritime piracy disrupts international navigation and trade and threatens the lives and property of people of many nations. Several international organizations including the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the International Maritime Organization and the European Union have been actively engaged in addressing this grave problem. Navies from the EU and NATO and from several countries, including the United States, Russia, India, Japan and South Korea, have deployed their warships off the coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden to protect trade routes because of the recent upsurge of attacks on ships by Somali Pirates. This Article endeavors to establish a framework for individual nations and the international community to respond to pirate attacks in Somali coastal waters. Because many acts of piracy occur initially on the high seas outside Somalia's territorial waters, these acts fall most prominently within the scope of the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention(LOS) and the United Nations Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA). Accordingly, when permissible, individual nations falling victim to pirate attacks should seek to arrest and prosecute pirates in their national courts under these principal maritime conventions. To address the challenge posed by pirates, the United Nations Security Council has adopted several resolutions authorizing states to take the necessary actions to combat piracy, including in the territorial waters of Somalia. Norms prescribed under several conventions including the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention(UNCLOS), maritime law, and domestic laws of various states provide for jurisdiction by states to prosecute and punish pirates. By the way, current domestic, regional and international legal frameworks fail to adequately combat the nature and scale of maritime piracy. Until now, states and international legal institutions have addressed the piracy problem through a series of conventions, treaties, resolutions and regional agreements. Without a uniform, comprehensive legal framework, states have attempted to tackle piracy as best they can. These limited approaches highlight the deficiencies of international anti-piracy instruments. Thus there is a need for a definitive, international, body of law to systematically govern this field. This article is divided into five parts. Part I is the introduction. Part II briefly reviews the political situation and piracy activities of Somalia. Part III explores the legal framework applicable to piracy and a review of the wide range of international and regional responses to prevent and deter acts of piracy and punish the pirates. Part IV examines the operations which have been coordinated by NATO, the EU, and a coalition led by the United States, in addition to several countries operating on their own. The concluding Part V contains the limitation on the regulation of piracy by international law and the recommendations.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 김태운, "한국 法廷의 소말리아해적 재판의 분석과 국제법적 검토", 해사법연구, 23(3), pp.67~100 (2011), 한국해사법학회
  2. 박영길, "유엔해양법협약 상 해적의 개념과 보편적 관할권", 서울국제법연구, 18(1), pp.47~80 (2011), 서울국제법연구원
  3. 이재민, "해적에 대한 보편주의 관할권 행사와 국내법 규정 - 소말리아 해적사건을 중심으로 -", 국제법학회논총, 56(2), pp.141~183 (2011), 대한국제법학회
  4. 임채현, "소말리아 해적과 국제적 대응방안에 관한 고찰", 해사법연구, 22(2), pp.101~138 (2010), 한국해사법학회
  5. 피터 아이흐스테드, "해적국가", pp.339~ (2011), 도서출판 미지북스
  6. Christopher Totten, "Somali Piracy: Jurisdictional Issues, Enforcement Problems and Potential Solutions", Gerogetown Journal of International Law, (Winter), pp.377~424 (2010)
  7. Eugen Kontorovich, "An Empirical Examination of Universal Jurisdiction for Piracy", American Journal of International Law, pp.436~453 (2010)
  8. Eugen Kontorovich, "A Guantánamo on the Sea : The Difficulty of Prosecuting Pirates and Terrorists", California Law Review, pp.243~275 (2010)
  9. James Thuo Gathii, "Kenya's Piracy Prosecutions", American Journal of International Law, 104(3), pp.416~436 (2010)
  10. James Thuo Gathii, "The Use of Force, Freedom of Commerce, And Double Standards in Prosecuting Pirates in Kenya", American University Law Review, 59(5), pp.1321~1361 (2010)
  11. James Thuo Gathii, "Jurisdiction to Prosecute Non-National Pirates Captured By Third States under Kenyan and International Law", Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, (Summer), pp.363~404 (2009)
  12. J. Ashley Roach, "Countering Piracy Off Somalia : International Law and International Institutions", American Journal of International Law, pp.397~416 (2010)
  13. John R. Crook, "United States Participation in International Efforts to Combat Piracy", Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law", American Journal of International Law, 103(4), pp.750~755 (2009)
  14. Maro Silva, "Somalia: State Failure, Piracy, and the Challenge to International Law", Virginia Journal of International Law, (Spring), pp.553~577 (2010)
  15. Mattew C. Houghton, "Walking the Plank: How United Nations Security Council Resolution 1816, While Progressive, Fails to Provide a Comprehensive Solution to Somali Piracy", Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, pp.253~286 (2009)
  16. Michael Bahar, "Attaining Optimal Deterrence at Sea: A Legal and Strategic Theory For Naval Anti-Piracy Operations", Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, pp.1~85 (2007)
  17. Sandra L. Hodgkinson, "Piracy: New Efforts in Addressing This Enduring Problem", Tulane Maritime Law Journal, (Winter), pp.67~122 (2011)
  18. Tullio Treves, "Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia", European Journal of International Law, pp.399~414 (2009)
  19. Ved P. Nanda, "Maritime Piracy: How Can International Law and Policy Address This Growing Global Menace", Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, (Spring), pp.177~207 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)