본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유엔인권이사회의 성과와 과제 — 2011년 “유엔인권이사회 재검토”(Review of the Human Rights Council) 논의를 중심으로 —

The Outcomes and Tasks of the Human Rights Council : Focusing on the “Review of the Human Rights Council”

박진아
안암법학회 (Anam Law Association)|2013.01|안암법학 (Anam Law Review)|제40호|pp. 261-291|DOI 10.22822/alr..40.201301.261

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

유엔인권이사회Universal Periodic Review (UPR)인권이사회 재검토보편적정기검토특별절차제기장치진정절차Human Rights Council (HRC)Review of the Human Rights CouncilSpecial ProceduresTrigger mechanismcomplaint procedure

초록

The United Nations Human Rights Council was established by General Assembly resolution 60/251 on 2006 in order to promote “universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in a fair and equal manner.” When creating Human Rights Council in March 2006 the United Nations General Assembly decided that the Council’s work and functioning should be reviewed five years after it had come into existence at the level of the General Assembly. According to the General Assembly resolution 60/251, the Human Rights Council had a meeting to discuss the review of Human Rights Council from 2009 and the General Assembly adopts a Resolution (65/281) following the 5-year review of the Human Rights Council. This article examined the outcomes and tasks of the Human Rights Council for the past 6 years since it was established in 2006 with focusing on discussion about review of the Human Rights Council. In sort, the outcome of review dose not contain any fundamental novelties comparing to the Institution Building of 2007 (Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1). However, the review process offered a good opportunity to evaluate the Human Rights Council’s performance, to identify gaps and shortcomings, to consider options to current working elements, and to make the Human Rights Council more effective and more efficient in implementing its mandate. The next review of Human Rights Council is scheduled to be consider again at a time no sooner than ten years and no later than fifteen years. Until that time, the Human Rights Council need to upgrade their ability to protect human rights in their own system.

Abstract

The United Nations Human Rights Council was established by General Assembly resolution 60/251 on 2006 in order to promote “universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in a fair and equal manner.” When creating Human Rights Council in March 2006 the United Nations General Assembly decided that the Council’s work and functioning should be reviewed five years after it had come into existence at the level of the General Assembly. According to the General Assembly resolution 60/251, the Human Rights Council had a meeting to discuss the review of Human Rights Council from 2009 and the General Assembly adopts a Resolution (65/281) following the 5-year review of the Human Rights Council. This article examined the outcomes and tasks of the Human Rights Council for the past 6 years since it was established in 2006 with focusing on discussion about review of the Human Rights Council. In sort, the outcome of review dose not contain any fundamental novelties comparing to the Institution Building of 2007 (Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1). However, the review process offered a good opportunity to evaluate the Human Rights Council’s performance, to identify gaps and shortcomings, to consider options to current working elements, and to make the Human Rights Council more effective and more efficient in implementing its mandate. The next review of Human Rights Council is scheduled to be consider again at a time no sooner than ten years and no later than fifteen years. Until that time, the Human Rights Council need to upgrade their ability to protect human rights in their own system.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 신각수, "人權理事會 설립과 국제인권 발전", 서울국제법연구, 13(1), pp.89~112 (2006), 서울국제법연구원
  2. 우종길, "유엔인권이사회(Human Rights Council)의 새로운 국제인권보호제도인 보편적정기검토(Universal Periodic Review)에 관한 소고", 서울국제법연구, 15(1), pp.345~364 (2008), 서울국제법연구원
  3. 국가인권기구의 유엔조약 감시기구 내 역할, "Amrei Mülle", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2008)
  4. Alson, Philip, "Hobbling the Monitors: Should U.N. Human Rights Monitors be Accountable?", Harvard International Law Journal, 52 (2011)
  5. Hafner-Burton, "Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem", International Organization, 62 (2008)
  7. "New Prospects for Human Rights-The Human Rights Council between the Review Process and the Arab Spring (Fridrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2012)" (2012)[URL]
  8. Sen, Purna, "Universal Periodic Review. Lessons, Hopes, Expectations" (2011), Commonwealth Secretariat
  9. Smith, Rhona K.M, "More of the Same or Something Different? Preliminary Observations on the Contribution of Universal Periodic Review with Reference to the Chinese Experience", Chinese Journal of International Law, 10 (2011)
  10. "UNGA Res. 60", 251, “Human Rights Council” (15 March 2006), RES, pp.60, 251[DOI]
  11. "UNGA Res. 65", 281, “Review of the Human Rights Council”(17 June 2011), RES, pp.65, 281[DOI]
  12. "UNHRC Decision 17", 119, “Follow-up to the Human Rights Council resolution 16, UN Doc. A, pp.HRC, DEC[DOI]
  13. "UNHRC Decision 6", 102, “Follow-up to Human Rights council resolution 5, UN Doc. A, pp.HRC, 6[DOI]
  14. "UNHRC Res S-19", 1, “The deteriorating situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic, and the recent killings in El-Houleh” (1 June 2012), HRC, pp.RES, S-19[DOI]
  15. "UNHRC Res, “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic” (23 March 2012)", UN Doc. A, REs, pp.19, 22[DOI]
  16. "UNHRC Res. 15", 21, “The rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association,”(30 September 2010), HRC, pp.RES, 15[DOI]
  17. "UNHRC Res. 16", 21, “Review of the work and functioning of the Human Rights council” (25 March 2011), HRC, pp.RES, 16[DOI]
  18. "UNHRC Res. 16", 9, “Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran”(24 March 2011), HRC, pp.RES, 16[DOI]
  19. "UNHRC Res. 19", 1, “The escalating grave human rights violations and the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Syrian Arab Republic” (1 March 2012), HRC, pp.19, 1[DOI]
  20. "UNHRC Res. 5", 1, “Institution-building of the United Nations Human Rights Council” (18 June 2007), HRC, pp.21, 2007[DOI]
  21. UNHRC, "Compilation of state proposals”, Open-Ended Intergovern- mental Working Group on the Review of the Work and Functioning of the Human Rights Council, 1st session, Geneva", UN Doc. A, WG.8, pp.1, CRP.1[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

유엔인권이사회의 보편적 정례검토제도- 한국의 실행과 평가를 중심으로 -박병도사단법인 법조협회 · 법조2009 · 제58권 제8호유엔 인권이사회의 특별절차에 관한 검토와 평가- 국제인권법의 발전에 미친 영향을 중심으로박진아법학연구원 · 법학논총2020 · 제48권 국가인권위원회에 의한 인권보장과 과제이발래유럽헌법학회 · 유럽헌법연구2011 · 제9호국가의 유엔 인권조약상 인권보장의무 제고를 위한 제안 - 국제인권시민단체의 관점에서 -오재창법과정책연구원 · 국제법무2012 · 제4권 제1호북한 인권 문제의 현황과 전망 - 유엔 안전보장이사회 상정을 계기로 -정태욱민주주의법학연구회 · 민주법학2015 · 제57호2014년 유엔총회 북한인권 결의를 통해 본 유엔인권메커니즘 동학에 관한 연구: 그 함의와 전망을 중심으로김진아한국국방연구원 · 국방정책연구2015 · 제31권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)

후보단일화와 공직선거법상 사후매수죄의 위헌여부 — 헌재 2012. 12. 27. 2012헌바47 공직선거법 제232조 제1항 제2호 위헌소원결정에 대한 비판 —방승주pp. 1-34정당의 공직선거후보자 선출에 있어서의 역선택(Party Raiding) 문제 — 미연방대법원의 판결 분석을 통한 대안 마련을 위하여 —최병훈pp. 35-86대향범에 대한 공범규정 적용의 타당성 — 자본시장법상 미공개정보 이용행위에 대한 처벌규정을 중심으로 —구길모pp. 87-124설명의무와 지도의무 — 설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향 —백경희, 안법영pp. 125-161징계의 본질에 대한 소고김성진pp. 163-198
원문 보기