본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2014년 유엔총회 북한인권 결의를 통해 본 유엔인권메커니즘 동학에 관한 연구: 그 함의와 전망을 중심으로

Dynamics of the UN Human Rights Mechanism and Implications of the UNGA Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in the DPRK

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

2014년 유엔총회의 북한인권 결의문은 과거에 비해 개념적 접근에서 실천적 접근으로, 외교적 차원에서 법적 차원으로 대응방식을 구체화시키는 변화를 보였다. 특히 구속력의 부재라는 총회 기능의 한계성을 극복하기 위해 북한인권논의를 안보리로 옮겨 국제사회가 보다 실천적인 행동을 취할 수 있는 기회를열어놓고자 했다. 그러나 현 정치・외교적 환경은 추진동력을 상실할 수 있는 구조적 제약성을 안고 있으며, 유엔의 인권메커니즘을 현실주의적 관점에서 대북압박의 수단으로 활용하는 데에는 한계가 있다. 한편, 북한이 국제사회가 규범을중요시하고 있음을 인지하고 규범준수 국가들과의 관계를 관리하고자 하는 적응(acculturation) 과정에 있다고 볼 때, 장기적 관점에서 북한인권 문제의 해결을위한 인권메커니즘의 기능을 분석할 필요가 있다.

Abstract

The UN resolution on the human rights situation in North Korea recently adoptedby the General Assembly shows meaningful changes in the way that the internationalcommunity deals with the North Korea’s human rights situation, particularly from conceptual,diplomatic to legal, practical approaches. However, given the political anddiplomatic climate surrounding this issue, the utility of the UN human rights mechanismas a coercive means may not be as much effective as many observers expect. Since North Korea encounters cognitive and social pressures to conform to the internationaldemands, we need to explore the possibility of North Korea's behavioralchange in terms of acculturation leading to conformity in the long-run.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 김영석, "국제형사재판소 관할 범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 법률 해설서", 법무부, ~ (2008)
  2. ICC 형사절차 실무 및 주요 수소, 재판 사례 분석, "이윤제", 대검찰청, ~ (2010)
  3. 이진규, "국제재판에서의 강행규범의 발전 - 국제인권법 및 국제인도법의 적용을 중심으로 -", 원광법학, 26(1), pp.513~537 (2010), 법학연구소
  4. 북한인권백서, "조정현", 통일연구원, 11~ (2013)
  5. George, Alexander, "Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War" (2009), United States Institute of Peace Press
  6. Evans, Gareth, "The Responsibility to Protect", pp.16~ (2001), ICISS
  7. Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea at the Human Rights Council twenty-fifth session, "Commission of Inquiry", ~, pp.A (2014), HRC[DOI]
  8. Koh, Harold Hongju, "Internalization through Socialization", Duke Law Journal, 54, pp.975~982 (2005)
  9. International Criminal Court, "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", 2187 U.N.T.S.90, ~ (1998)
  10. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, "ICISS", International Development Research Centre, ~ (2001)
  11. Fish, Isaac Stone, "If you Want Rule of Law, Respect Ours", Foreign Policy, ~ (2014)
  12. Gordon, Joy, "Smart Sanctions Revisited", Ethics and International Affairs, 25(3), pp.315~335 (2011)
  13. Kritz, Neil, "Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes" (1995), United States Institute for Peace Press
  14. Goodman, Ryan, "Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights Through International Law", pp.5~6 (2013), Oxford University Press
  15. Goodman, Ryan, "Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change", pp.86~ (2012), Cambridge University Press
  16. Payne, Rodger A., "Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction", European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), pp.37~61 (2001)
  17. Risse, Thomas, "The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  18. Weiss, Thomas, "Humanitarian Intervention: War and Conflict in the Modern World", pp.105~ (2014), Polity
  19. UN Secretary-General Report on Implementing the Responsibility to Protect, "United Nations", ~, pp.A (2009), 63[DOI]
  20. Outcome Document of the 2005 United Nations World Summit on 24 October 2005, "UN General Assembly", 138~140, pp.A (2005), RES[DOI]
  21. Resolution on the Situation of human Rights in the Syrian Arab Republic, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2013), RES[DOI]
  22. Draft Resolution adopted at the Third Committee on 14 November 2014, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2014), C.3[DOI]
  23. Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2014), RES[DOI]
  24. Resolution on the Situation of human Rights in the syrian Arab Republic, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2014), RES[DOI]
  25. Resolution on the Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2014), RES[DOI]
  26. Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, "UN General Assembly", ~, pp.A (2014), RES[DOI]
  27. UN High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, "A More Secure World: Our shared responsibility" (2004), United Nations Department of Public Information
  28. Outcome of the universal periodic review:Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, "UN Human Rights Council", ~, pp.A (2014), HRC[DOI]
  29. UN Security Council, "Resolution 1970 adopted by the Security Council at its 6491st meeting", S, 1970, pp.2011, ~
  30. UN Security Council, "Resolution 1973 adopted by the Security Council at its 6498th meeting", S, 1973, pp.2011, ~
  31. UN Security Council, "Record at the 6524th meeting", S, 2011
  32. UN Security Council, "Record at the 6598th meeting", S, 2011
  33. UN Security Council, "Record at the 6627th meeting", S, 2011
  34. UN Security Council, "Record at the 6711st meeting", S, 2012
  35. UN Security Council., "Draft Resolution", S, 77, pp.2012 (2012), ~
  36. UN Security Council, "Resolution 2139 adopted by the Security Council at its 7116th meeting", S, 2139, pp.2014, ~
  37. UN Security Council, "Letter from the Permanent Representatives of Australia, France and the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council", S, 276, pp.2014 (2014), ~
  38. UN Security Council, "Record at the 7180th meeting", S, 2014
  39. UN Security Council, "Resolution 2165 adopted by the Security Council at its 7216th meeting", S, 2165, pp.2014, ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)