본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터넷상 표현의 자유와 전략적 봉쇄소송(SLAPP)

Freedom of Expression on the Internet and Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation(SLAPP)

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

A SLAPP(strategic lawsuit against public participation) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition. While most SLAPPs are legally meritless, the typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat. The difficulty is that plaintiffs do not present themselves to the Court admitting that their intent is to censor, intimidate or silence their critics. SLAPPs have various forms. A new form of lawsuit called a "Cyber SLAPP" or “SLAPP in the Cyberspace” is threatening to overturn the promise of anonymous online speech and chill the freedom of expression that is central to the online world. CyberSLAPP cases typically involve a person who has posted anonymous criticisms of a corporation or public figure on the Internet. The target of the criticism then files a frivolous lawsuit just so they can issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider(ISP) involved, discover the identity of their anonymous critic, and intimidate or silence them. This study aims to explore the concept, intent, effects and problems of SLAPP. More specifically, this study focuses on SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Part I explores the concept and problem of SLAPP in general. Part II analyze the concept, intent, effects and problems of SLAPP. Part III analyze the concept, intent, types, effects, problems of SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Part IV provides defenses against SLAPP, including SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Finally, Part V argues for establishing efficient defenses against SLAPP.

Abstract

A SLAPP(strategic lawsuit against public participation) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition. While most SLAPPs are legally meritless, the typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat. The difficulty is that plaintiffs do not present themselves to the Court admitting that their intent is to censor, intimidate or silence their critics. SLAPPs have various forms. A new form of lawsuit called a "Cyber SLAPP" or “SLAPP in the Cyberspace” is threatening to overturn the promise of anonymous online speech and chill the freedom of expression that is central to the online world. CyberSLAPP cases typically involve a person who has posted anonymous criticisms of a corporation or public figure on the Internet. The target of the criticism then files a frivolous lawsuit just so they can issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider(ISP) involved, discover the identity of their anonymous critic, and intimidate or silence them. This study aims to explore the concept, intent, effects and problems of SLAPP. More specifically, this study focuses on SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Part I explores the concept and problem of SLAPP in general. Part II analyze the concept, intent, effects and problems of SLAPP. Part III analyze the concept, intent, types, effects, problems of SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Part IV provides defenses against SLAPP, including SLAPP in the Cyberspace. Finally, Part V argues for establishing efficient defenses against SLAPP.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 정동윤, "민사소송법, 제3판" (2009)
  2. 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2009), 세창출판사
  3. 이시윤, "신민사소송법, 제7판" (2013)
  4. 김종서, "전략적 봉쇄소송 규제법제에 관한 연구", 민주법학, (30), pp.13~49 (2006), 민주주의법학연구회
  5. 박경신, "전략적 봉쇄소송 억제(Anti-SLAPP)법리의미국민사소송제도 상의 환경에 대한 이해와우리나라에서의 적용가능성", 법학연구, 14(3), pp.77~106 (2011), 법학연구소
  6. 박주민, "미신고 집회 집회주최자의민사상 손해배상책임 -서울고등법원 2012.1.19. 선고 2011나16525, 16532(병합) 판결에서의 판단을 중심으로-", 고려법학, (64), pp.101~138 (2012), 법학연구원
  7. 정영수, "전략적 소송(SLAPP)에 관한 연구", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.495~530 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
  8. (2008)[URL]
  9. Pring, George, "SLAPPs: Getting Sued for Speaking Out" (1996)
  10. "THE OIL INDUSTRY AND CLIMATE CHANGE" (2006)[URL]
  11. Abrams, Robert, "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP)", Pace Envtl. L. Rev, 7, pp.33~ (1989)
  12. Baruch, Chad, "I Had Hammer: Defending SLAPP Suits in Texas", Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev, 3, pp.55~ (1996)
  13. Brecher, Joseph, "The Public Interest and Intimidation Suits: A New Approach", Santa Clara L. Rev, 28, pp.105~ (1988)
  14. Cosentino, Victor J., "Note, Strategic Lawsuit Against Participation: An Analysis of the Solutions", Cal. W.L. Rev, 27, pp.399~ (1991)
  15. Devine, James W., "RULE 11'S BIG-MOUTHED LITTLE BROTHER: HOW A FEDERAL ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE WOULD REPRODUCE RULE 11'S GROWING PAINS", Ave Maria L. Rev, 9, pp.367~ (2011)
  16. Erichson-Siegel, Laura, "Comment, Siliencing SLAPPs: An Examination of Proposed Legislative Solutions", Fla. St. U.L. Rev, 20, pp.487~ (1992)
  17. Ferris, Charles D., "COMMENTARY: FAIRNESS – THE BROADCASTER’S HIPPOCRATIC OATH", Cath. U.L. Rev, 34, pp.605~ (1985)
  18. Furman, Joshua R., "Cybersmear or Cyber-SLAPP: Analyzing Defamation Suits Against Online John Does as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation", Seattle U. L. Rev, 25, pp.213~ (2001)
  19. Jandazza, Marc J., "The Need for a Unified and Cohesive National Anti-SLAPP Law", Or. L. Rev, 91, pp.627~ (2012)
  20. Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, "SILENCING JOHN DOE: DEFAMATION & DISCLOSURE IN CYBERSPACE", Duke L.J, 49, pp.855~ (2000)
  21. Note, "Counterclaim and Countersuit Harassment of Environmental Plaintiffs: The Problem, Its Implications and Proposed Solutions", Mich. L. Rev, 74, pp.106~ (1975)
  22. O'Neill, Jesse J., "THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ACT OF 2009: FEDERAL LEGISLATION AS AN EFFECTIVE DEFENSE AGAINST SLAPPS", B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev, 38, pp.477~ (2011)
  23. Pring, George, "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation(SLAPPs): An Introduction for Bench, Bar and Bystanders", Bridgeport L. Rev, 12, pp.937~ (1992)
  24. Pring, George, "SLAPPs: AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRACTICE", ALI- ABA, C935, pp.1~ (1994)
  25. Richards, Robert D., "A SLAPP IN THE FACEBOOK: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF STRATEGIC LAWSUITS AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ON SOCIAL NETWORKS, BLOGS AND CONSUMER GRIPE SITES", DePaul J. Art Tech. & Intell. Prop. L, 21, pp.221~ (2010)
  26. Ruhl, J. B., "Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State", Duke L.J, 45, pp.849~ (1996)
  27. Segal, Jonathan, "ANTI-SLAPP LAW MAKE BENEFIT FOR GLORIOUS ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY OF AMERICA: BORAT, REALITY BITES, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ANTI-SLAPP FENCE AROUND THE FIRST AMENDMENT", Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J, 26, pp.639~ (2009)
  28. Tate, Kathryn W., "CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-SLAPP LEGISLATION: A SUMMARY OF AND COMMENTARY ON ITS OPERATION AND SCOPE", Loy. L. A. L. Rev, 33, pp.801~ (1999)
  29. Trende, Sean P., "Defamation, Anti-SLAPP Legislation, and the Blogsphere: New Solutions for an Old Problem", Duq. L. Rev, 44, pp.607~ (2005)
  30. Weldman, Thomas A., "SLAPP SUITS: WEAKNESS IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT LAW AND IN THE COURTS’ RESPONSES TO FRIVILOUS LITIGATION", UCLA L. Rev, 39, pp.979~ (1992)
  31. Wells, James A., "EXPORTING SLAPPS: INTERNATIONAL USE OF THE U.S. ‘SLAPP’ TO SUPPRESS DISSENT AND CRITICAL SPEECH", Temp. Int’l&Comp. L.J, 12, pp.457~ (1998)
  32. Wyrwich, Tom, "A CURE FOR A “PUBLIC CONCERN”: WASHINGTON’S NEW ANTI-SLAPP LAW", Wash. L. Rev, 86, pp.663~ (2011)
  33. 烏賀陽弘道, "「SLAPP」とは何か--「公的意見表明の妨害を狙って提訴される民事訴訟」被害防止のために", 法律時報, 82(7) (2010)
  34. 綿貫芳源, "アメリカ法曹便り アメリカにおけるSLAPP訴訟の動向(1)", 法律のひろば, 50(4) (1997)
  35. 綿貫芳源, "アメリカ法曹便り アメリカにおけるSLAPP訴訟の動向(2)", 法律のひろば, 50(5) (1997)
  36. 綿貫芳源, "アメリカ法曹便り アメリカにおけるSLAPP訴訟の動向(3・完)", 法律のひろば, 50(6) (1997)
  37. "Boing Boing Homepage"[URL]
  38. "California Anti-SLAPP Project Homepage"[URL]
  39. "CyberSLAPP.org Homepage"[URL]
  40. "JOLT digest Homepage"[URL]
  41. "Public Participation Project Homepage"[URL]
  42. "SLAPPIC(SLAPP INFORMATION CENTRE) Homepage"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)