본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학교 영재들을 위한 학교교육과정 개발 모형 탐색

An Exploration of the Development of School-based Curriculum Model for the Gifted in Elementary School

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

1992년 제6차 교육과정에서부터 도입된 초등학교 학교교육과정개발 정책은 단위 학교에서 영재들을 위한 교육과정을 개발하여 교육할 것을 주문하고 있다. 연구자는 그 활동을 돕기 위해 초등학교 영재들을 위한 학교교육과정 개발 모형을 구안하여 제시하였다. 본 모형은 VanTassel-Baska의 통합적 교육과정 모델(ICM: Integrated Curriculum Model)을 초등교육의 정체성에 비추어 재구성한 것으로서, ICM의 하위모델인 내용 모델, 과정-산출 모델, 인식론적 모델을 초등학교 1~6 학년 아동들의 발달단계에 적절하게 그 적용 비중을 조절하는 것을 특징으로 하고 있다. 본 모형은 초등학교 영재 탤런트 풀을 대상으로 한 교육과정 개발의 일반 모형인 동시에, 영재 개개인의 특성과 요구에 따라서도 그 적용 비중이 달라질 수 있는 개인 모델로서도 기능할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

Since 1992, the sixth national curriculum introduced the policy of school- based curriculum development(SBCD) and required all the public elementary schools to develop their own curriculum for the gifted children in their schools. However, in spite of the fact that this curriculum policy for the gifted children has the history of 15 years until now, the current state of its implementation seems to be unsatisfactory. The major reason for that seems to be due to the reality that the schools have not had the theoretical basis for the curriculum development fot the gifted children. In this vein, the researcher presented the theoretical SBCD model for the gifted children in elementary schools under the assumption that the model should suit the identity of elementary education, so that the gifted education in the elementary school can be implemented in its own form and adequacy. Based on the identity of elementary education, the model was developed by reformulating three component models of VanTassel- Baska’s ICM: content model, process-product model, and epistemological model. The major feature of the researcher’s model is to adapt and adjust the three component models differently according to the age level from the first to sixth graders in the elementary school. The model can be used not only as a general model for the talent pool of the school but also as an individual model for a specific gifted child by taking his special needs and characteristics into account. The model is a theoretical one based on the curriculum models for the gifted which were presented by several scholars in the area of G/T education, and it needs to be validated empirically in the future.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "초등학교 교육과정 해설(I)" (1999), 서울: 대한교과서
  2. "Autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability" (1999), Greely, CO: Alps Publishing
  3. "University of Texas Press." (1985)
  4. "and the development of talent. In R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Davidson Conceptualization of giftedness", pp.264~284 (1986), Cambirdge University Press.
  5. ". Education of the gifted and talented. NJ" (1989), Prentice Hall Inc.
  6. "The University of Chicago Press.", pp.11~ (1971)
  7. "Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs", pp.271~282 (2000), NY: Elsvier
  8. ". The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J.S. Renzulli Systmes and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented", pp.126~152 (1986), . Mansfield Center Creative Learning Press.
  9. ". Giftedness and talent re-examining a re-examination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly", pp.103~112 (1985)
  10. "Theory and practice. In J. VanTassel-Baska Curriculum for gifted and talented students", pp.93~102 (1986), Corwin Press.
  11. ". Education of the gifted and talented. Volme I Report to the congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Educatio. Washington" (1971)
  12. ". Toward a psychology of being" (1968), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  13. ". The SOI system for gifted education. In J.S. Renzulli Systmes and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented" (1986), . Mansfield Center Creative Learning Press.
  14. ". Differentiated curriculum for the gifted", talented A point of View. In S.N. Kaplan et al Curricula for the gifted Ventura County Superintendent of School Office., 1982, 4~20
  15. "education of. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite The international encyclopedia of education", pp.2045~2056 (1985)
  16. ". Planning for talented youth. NYC" (1955), Teachers College Press.
  17. "Talent development in science and technology", pp.427~438 (2000), NY: ELSEVIER
  18. "The School-wide Enrichment Model: New directions for developing high-end learning", pp.136~154 (1997), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
  19. ". National report on identification Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell" (1982), Educational Improvement Center-South.
  20. ". Toward a theory of creativity. ETC A Review of General Semantics", pp.249~260 (1954)
  21. "Child development" (1996), Dubuque, IA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc.
  22. "Talents unlimited model in programs for gifted students", pp.318~327 (1997), Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  23. ". Fostering effective independent learning through individualized programming. In J.S. Renzulli Systems and models for developing effective programs for the gifted and talented", pp.429~460 (1986), . Mansfield Center Creative Learning Press.
  24. ". Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. In J. VanTassel-Baska Curriculum for gifted and talented students", pp.1~12 (1986), Corwin Press.
  25. "A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students", pp.147~166 (1998), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  26. "A curriculum study of gifted-student learning in the language arts", pp.165~190 (2002), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
  27. ". The aims of education and other essays. NY" (1929), The Free Press.
  28. "Education for the gifted Part II. National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago University of Chicago Press.", pp.41~63 (1958)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)