본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

하곡 정제두의 지행합일론

The Theory of Unity of Knowledge and Conduct of Hagok, Jeong Jae Doo

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

Hagok Jeong Jae Doo believed that man is, as a principle of life, equipped with the good knowledge, or the moral autonomy capable of judging right and wrong. He formed his ideas on man based on this principle of life theory. The characteristics of his theory on conduct and knowledge, which was formed based on his such ideas about mankind, area s follows. First, he understood this 'good knowledge' not as a natural and reasonable state, but as 'the reason why' on which it was based upon. Second, by contending that good knowledge was a principle of life unlike the abstract knowledge about principles we infer from experience, he emphasized the activeness and creativeness of good knowledge. Third, the theory contends that the bright virtue(明德)-the inherent fundamental characteristic of the subjective person-is comprised of knowledge and ability required to become aware of and realize the principles of the he avens. Fourth, the principle of life is self enlightening, and simultaneously possesses the four virtues and realizes them aptly. Fifth, good knowledge as the essence of them ind and the realization of the principles of objects through its application cannot be separated. Sixth, the physical application of good knowledge is metaphorically explained as the inability to tell apart the brightness of a light and the brightness of shining a light, meaning that practice is incorporated in the good knowledge itself. Seventh, the fundamentals (大本) and achieving morality(達道), bright virtue and closeness with the people(親民), knowledge and conduct is only represented in the form of learning and application, but are all one and the same. Eighth, in order to recover the essence of unity of knowledge and conduct, efforts to remove personal greed, physical restraint, and bad habits must be made to reach the stage at which one is able to practice morality and virtue even when alone.

Abstract

Hagok Jeong Jae Doo believed that man is, as a principle of life, equipped with the good knowledge, or the moral autonomy capable of judging right and wrong. He formed his ideas on man based on this principle of life theory. The characteristics of his theory on conduct and knowledge, which was formed based on his such ideas about mankind, area s follows. First, he understood this 'good knowledge' not as a natural and reasonable state, but as 'the reason why' on which it was based upon. Second, by contending that good knowledge was a principle of life unlike the abstract knowledge about principles we infer from experience, he emphasized the activeness and creativeness of good knowledge. Third, the theory contends that the bright virtue(明德)-the inherent fundamental characteristic of the subjective person-is comprised of knowledge and ability required to become aware of and realize the principles of the he avens. Fourth, the principle of life is self enlightening, and simultaneously possesses the four virtues and realizes them aptly. Fifth, good knowledge as the essence of them ind and the realization of the principles of objects through its application cannot be separated. Sixth, the physical application of good knowledge is metaphorically explained as the inability to tell apart the brightness of a light and the brightness of shining a light, meaning that practice is incorporated in the good knowledge itself. Seventh, the fundamentals (大本) and achieving morality(達道), bright virtue and closeness with the people(親民), knowledge and conduct is only represented in the form of learning and application, but are all one and the same. Eighth, in order to recover the essence of unity of knowledge and conduct, efforts to remove personal greed, physical restraint, and bad habits must be made to reach the stage at which one is able to practice morality and virtue even when alone.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. "霞谷集,韓國文集總刊160", ~
  2. "論語", ~
  3. "大學", ~
  4. "尙書", ~
  5. "性理大全", ~
  6. "傳習錄", ~
  7. "朱子語類", ~
  8. "朱子全書", ~
  9. "中庸", ~
  10. "中庸章句", ~
  11. 금장태, "하곡 정제두의 심학과 경학", 서울대 종교학연구, 17, pp.23~45 (1998)
  12. 김교빈, "양명학자 정제두의 철학사상" (1995), 한길사
  13. 김길한, "한국 양명학 연구" (1981), 일지사
  14. 蒙培元, "성리학의 개념들" (2008), 예문서원
  15. 민족과 사상연구회, "사단칠정론" (1992), 서광사
  16. 박연수, "양명학의 이해" (1999), 집문당
  17. 方立天, "중국철학과 지행의 문제" (1998), 예문서원
  18. 박종홍, "한국사상사논고-유학편" (1974), 서문당
  19. 배종호, "한국유학사" (1974), 연세대학교출판부
  20. 서경숙, "초기강화학파의 양명학", 박사, pp.2000
  21. 윤남한, "조선시대의 양명학 연구" (1982), 집문당
  22. 윤사순, "한국유학사상론" (1986), 열음사
  23. 정낙찬, "퇴계의 경의 교육방법론", 교육철학, 17, pp.251~272 (1999), 한국교철학회
  24. 정낙찬, "남명 교육방법론의 현대 교육적 의미", 남명학연구논총, 11, pp.143~190 (2002), 남명학연구원
  25. 정낙찬, "한국유학사상대계. v 교육사상편" (2006), 한국국학진흥원
  26. 정낙찬, "여헌 장현광의 교육사상", 교육철학, 30, pp.163~194 (2007), 한국교육철학회
  27. 정낙찬, "서애 유성룡의 교육방법론", 교육철학, (34), pp.391~424 (2008), 한국교육철학회
  28. 정순목, "퇴계의 교육철학" (1986), 지식산업사
  29. 최재목, "동아사아의 양명학" (1996), 예문서원
  30. 한국철학회, "한국철학사(중)" (1987), 동명사
  31. 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 학파들" (1996), 예문서원
  32. 한국사상사연구회, "도설로 보는 한국유학" (2000), 예문서원
  33. 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 개념들" (2002), 예문서원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)