융합교육의 조건으로서 교사의 권위
The Teacher’s Authority from the Point of Fusion
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper tackles the educational point of fusion to confirm the authority of teachers. It has also examined the concept and types of ‘fusion’, which can throw light on the paradigm of knowledge-based society. For seeking a solution to the so-called ‘risk of teacher’s authority’, the distinction between conceptions of fusion has been made so that we can establish the ‘tacit’ dimension of it, which has originated from Michael Polanyi. The bridge should be the authority that teacher actually exercise. However, we have seen that it is insufficient to draw a distinction between formal and substantive authorities. Thus the fusion based education, as the paper asserts, requires another conception such as ‘tentative authority’ tentatively. Under this conception, we can conclude that the fusion based education fulfills three prerequisites for the successful education, which are dubbed as logical order, openness and passion. There must exist the significant domain that the cognitive and the affective ones fused each other, which Richard Peters has named ‘compassion.’
Abstract
The paper tackles the educational point of fusion to confirm the authority of teachers. It has also examined the concept and types of ‘fusion’, which can throw light on the paradigm of knowledge-based society. For seeking a solution to the so-called ‘risk of teacher’s authority’, the distinction between conceptions of fusion has been made so that we can establish the ‘tacit’ dimension of it, which has originated from Michael Polanyi. The bridge should be the authority that teacher actually exercise. However, we have seen that it is insufficient to draw a distinction between formal and substantive authorities. Thus the fusion based education, as the paper asserts, requires another conception such as ‘tentative authority’ tentatively. Under this conception, we can conclude that the fusion based education fulfills three prerequisites for the successful education, which are dubbed as logical order, openness and passion. There must exist the significant domain that the cognitive and the affective ones fused each other, which Richard Peters has named ‘compassion.’
참고문헌 (29)
- 고대승, "융합을 통한 가치창출. 과학문화 이슈페이퍼" (2008), 한국과학문화재단
- 김정래, "교육목적 논의에서의 패러다임의 변화", 한국교육학회 연차학술대회 자료집 (2000), 한국교육학회
- 김정래, "교과통합의 관점에서 본 ‘통섭’의 의미와 한계", 교과교육학연구, 12(3), pp.1023~1040 (2008), 교과교육연구소
- 김정래, "진보의 굴레를 넘어서" (2012), 기파랑
- 김정래, "'마음의 분화'의 비언어적 측면", 교육철학, (48), pp.217~245 (2012), 한국교육철학회
- 김종서, "잠재적 교육과정" (1976), 배영사
- 안건훈, "철학의 제 문제" (2009), 새문사
- 안건훈, "이분법적 사고방식" (2012), 서광사
- 오욱환, "교사 전문성" (2006), 교육과학사
- 이돈희, "교육철학개론" (1983), 교육과학사
- 이돈희, "지식융합시대의 교육학의 과제", 한국교육학회 연차학술대회 자료집 (2009), 한국교육학회
- 이홍우, "지식의 구조와 교과" (1979), 교육과학사
- 최재천, "지식의 통섭-학문의 경계를 넘다" (2007), 이음
- 홍성욱, "융합과 창의성의 관계" (2011), 한국과학창의재단
- Benn, S. I., "Social Principles and the Democratic State" (1959), George Allen & Unwin
- Dewey, J., "Democracy and Education" (1916), Macmillan
- Dearden, R. F., "초등교육의 철학" (2002), 교육과학사
- Dearden, R. F., "Problems in Primary Education" (1976), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Hirst, P. H., "Philosophical Analysis and Education" (1965), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Hirst, P. H., "Knowledge and the Curriculum" (1974), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Peters, R. S., "윤리학과 교육" (1980), 교육과학사
- Peters, R. S., "Authority, Responsibility and Education" (1973), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Peters, R. S., "Psychology and Ethical Development" (1974), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Polanyi, M., "Logic of Liberty" (1951), Liberty Fund
- Polanyi, M., "Personal Knowledge" (1958), University of Chicago Press
- Polanyi, M., "Tacit Dimension" (1966), University of Chicago Press
- Popper, K. R., "Conjecture and Refutations" (1963), Routledge &Kegan Paul
- Wilson. E. O., "통섭; 지식의 대통합" (2002), 사이언스 북스
- Whitehead, A. N., "The Aims of Education and Other Essays" (1932), Ernest Benn Limited