에라스무스의 『아동교육론』 연구
A Study on Education for Children of Erasmus
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The studies on educational ideas of Erasmus are mostly about the Reformation based on his theological background, Luther, and Christian education. Focusing on his representative and essential educational book, Education for Children, this researcher intended to examine his educational ideas. Erasmus regarded that only humans need education, which builds up their complete humanity. On the basis of such belief, the purpose of education, method and content, and roles of parents and teachers that Erasmus asserted were investigated. First, Erasmus argued that the purpose of education should be that pursuing the wisdom and living an upright life are human nature and it is realized through rationality. That is, humans should live an intellectual, moral, and good life by developing their rationality through education. Second, several kinds of methods and content are suggested according to this purpose of education. Since the earlier the time of education is, the more the effect is, education should start as soon as children are born. In addition, one of children’s characteristics, instinct of imitation, should be actively made use of to classical language and exact language education. He said that if fables would be told as the contents, both linguistic competence and ethical lessons could be acquired at the same time. Erasmus thought children should be given moral lessons through comedies and proverbs as well as fables. He asserted that children should acquire moral lessons naturally as comedies would deliver characters’ personalities and the lessons through humor. Lastly, Erasmus discussed roles of parents and teachers. He commented a duty of parents would be to help their children fully realize their humanity and nature right after their births. He also said another duty of parents would be that unless parents could perform the role, they should find good teachers for children’s education. Accordingly, teachers entrusted by parents should be excellent with their intellect and morality as well as respect of people. He asserted that teachers should treat children with carefulness and gentleness at class activities on those basis. He insisted that boring processes of classes should be performed like a play. In addition, Erasmus denied corporal punishment as a teaching method and emphasized on disciplining children with teachers’ love and affection, and praise and encouragement.
Abstract
The studies on educational ideas of Erasmus are mostly about the Reformation based on his theological background, Luther, and Christian education. Focusing on his representative and essential educational book, Education for Children, this researcher intended to examine his educational ideas. Erasmus regarded that only humans need education, which builds up their complete humanity. On the basis of such belief, the purpose of education, method and content, and roles of parents and teachers that Erasmus asserted were investigated. First, Erasmus argued that the purpose of education should be that pursuing the wisdom and living an upright life are human nature and it is realized through rationality. That is, humans should live an intellectual, moral, and good life by developing their rationality through education. Second, several kinds of methods and content are suggested according to this purpose of education. Since the earlier the time of education is, the more the effect is, education should start as soon as children are born. In addition, one of children’s characteristics, instinct of imitation, should be actively made use of to classical language and exact language education. He said that if fables would be told as the contents, both linguistic competence and ethical lessons could be acquired at the same time. Erasmus thought children should be given moral lessons through comedies and proverbs as well as fables. He asserted that children should acquire moral lessons naturally as comedies would deliver characters’ personalities and the lessons through humor. Lastly, Erasmus discussed roles of parents and teachers. He commented a duty of parents would be to help their children fully realize their humanity and nature right after their births. He also said another duty of parents would be that unless parents could perform the role, they should find good teachers for children’s education. Accordingly, teachers entrusted by parents should be excellent with their intellect and morality as well as respect of people. He asserted that teachers should treat children with carefulness and gentleness at class activities on those basis. He insisted that boring processes of classes should be performed like a play. In addition, Erasmus denied corporal punishment as a teaching method and emphasized on disciplining children with teachers’ love and affection, and praise and encouragement.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김빛나, "에라스무스 훈육이론의 교육사상사적 위치", 석사, 교육학과, pp.2013
- 김성훈, "에라스무스의『아동교육론』에서 찾아지는 플루타르코스의 흔적", 교육철학연구, (46), pp.47~63 (2009), 한국교육철학학회
- 박혜상, "2000년대 희극적 소설의 기법 연구 : 이기호·박형서·박민규의 단편소설을 중심으로", 석사, 문예창작학, pp.2011
- 선봉기, "에라스무스의 교육사상", 석사, 신학, pp.2000
- 윤혜원, "에라스무스의 교육이론 고찰", 석사, 초등교육방법, pp.2010
- 이상오, "에라스무스, 루터, 칼빈의 교육사상 비교연구", 석사, 교육철학, pp.2005
- 이승원, ""에라스무스의 아동중시 교육사상 연구". 경주전문대학", 경주전문대학논문집, 9, pp.373~389 (1995)
- 이영준, "에라스무스의 교육사상에 대한 교육본질론적 접근", 부산교육학연구, 16, pp.77~92 (2003), 한국교육학회 부산지회
- 주영흠, "에라스무스의 교양교육론 연구", 총신대논총, 23, pp.187~226 (2003), 총신대학교
- "<인성교육진흥법> 법률 제13004호", ~
- Boyd, W., "서양교육사" (2013), 교육과학사
- Erasmus, D., "아동교육론" (2007), 한국학술정보(주)
- Huizinga, J., "에라스뮈스" (2013), 연암서가
- Nash, P., "교육받은 사람Ⅰ" (1995), 집문당
- Nash, P., "교육받은 사람Ⅱ" (2000), 집문당
- Platon, "향연" (2011), 이제이북스
- Rousseau, J. J., "Emile or on Education" (1979), Basic Books
- Rousseau, J. J., "에밀" (2006), 육문사
- Rummel, E., "Encyclopedia of the Renaissance, Vol. 2" (1999), charles Scribner’s Sons
- Russell, B., "서양철학사" (2009), 을유문화사
- Scheuerl, H., "교육학의 거장들1" (2004), 한길사
- Wilds, E. H., "The Foundation of Modern Education, New and Enlarged ed" (1959), Rinehart and Co
- Woodward, W. H., "Desiderius Erasmus, concerning the Aim and Mothod of Education" (1904), University Press
