본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘소크라테스 대화’를 통한 시민교육의 실천적 방법에 관한 고찰

A Study on the Practical Method of Civic Education through ‘Socratic Dialogue’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The “being alone” culture is becoming a culture beyond mere fashion in contemporary Korea. In addition, rapidly developing social media such as SNS, Facebook, and Instagram are used as one-way communication channels to express one’s voice rather than as a network for communication with each other. This form of individualistic life that lacks communication and solidarity further intensifies the various conflicts that our society is currently experiencing. It also weakens people’s identity as democratic citizens, resulting in a crisis for democracy. In order to solve the challenges that we are experiencing today, characteristics for democratic citizens, such as critical thinking and rational communication skills are required. Therefore, this study aims to identify practical methods of civic education that strengthen democratic citizenship and its capabilities. In so doing, the study explores the “Neo-Socratic dialogue” of the Nelson-Heckman tradition, which was developed by reinterpreting ancient Socratic conversations from a modern perspective, and examines its validity as a practical method for civic education.

Abstract

The “being alone” culture is becoming a culture beyond mere fashion in contemporary Korea. In addition, rapidly developing social media such as SNS, Facebook, and Instagram are used as one-way communication channels to express one’s voice rather than as a network for communication with each other. This form of individualistic life that lacks communication and solidarity further intensifies the various conflicts that our society is currently experiencing. It also weakens people’s identity as democratic citizens, resulting in a crisis for democracy. In order to solve the challenges that we are experiencing today, characteristics for democratic citizens, such as critical thinking and rational communication skills are required. Therefore, this study aims to identify practical methods of civic education that strengthen democratic citizenship and its capabilities. In so doing, the study explores the “Neo-Socratic dialogue” of the Nelson-Heckman tradition, which was developed by reinterpreting ancient Socratic conversations from a modern perspective, and examines its validity as a practical method for civic education.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 박병기, "소크라테스 대화법의 이론과 실제", 철학연구, 113, pp.111~133 (2010), 대한철학회
  2. 박해용, "레오나르드 넬슨의 소크라테스 대화 이해와 그 적용", 사회와 철학, (19), pp.227~264 (2010), 한국사회와철학연구회
  3. 박해용, "소크라테스 대화법의 이론과 실제" (2013), 한국학술정보(주)
  4. 공동체와 민주주의 발전을 위한 시민교육 : 시민교육의 원칙과 현재적 과제, "이영제", 민주화운동기념사업회 연구소, 1~00 (2016)
  5. 이재현, "‘소크라테스 대화’의 규칙과 대화 지도자의 역할", 대동철학, 87, pp.203~235 (2019), 대동철학회
  6. 이재현, "‘소크라테스적 전형’에 따른 ‘소크라테스 대화’의 이론적 정당화에 관한 비판적 고찰", 대동철학, 94, pp.327~370 (2021), 대동철학회
  7. 이재현, "‘소크라테스 대화’의 절차에 대한 비판적 검토", 대동철학, 96, pp.213~248 (2021), 대동철학회
  8. 정창호, "인성교육과 민주시민교육을 위한 ‘소크라테스적 담화’", 철학∙사상∙문화, (31), pp.88~116 (2019), 동서사상연구소[DOI]
  9. 정희중, "‘소크라테스 대화’에서의 진리 합의와 자기이해", 범한철학, 106(3), pp.77~98 (2022), 범한철학회[DOI]
  10. 전헌상, "플라톤의 「메논」에서의 메논의 역설과 상기설", 지중해지역연구, 15(1), pp.31~58 (2013), 지중해지역원[DOI]
  11. 플라톤, "크리톤" (2017), 도서출판 숲
  12. 플라톤, "메논" (2009), 이제이북스
  13. 플라톤, "파이돈" (2017), 도서출판 숲
  14. 플라톤, "테아이테토스" (2019), 도서출판 숲
  15. 플라톤, "소크라테스의 변론" (2017), 도서출판 숲
  16. Birnbacher. D, "Enquiring minds Socratic dialogue in education" (2004), Trentham books
  17. Heckmann. G., "Enquiring minds Socratic dialogue in education" (2004), Trentham books
  18. Krohn. D., "Enquiring minds Socratic dialogue in education" (2004), Trentham books
  19. Nelson, L., "Enquiring minds Socratic dialogue in education" (2004), Trentham books
  20. Putnam, D. Robert., "나 홀로 볼링 : 사회적커뮤니티의 붕괴와 소생" (2009), 페이퍼로드
  21. Rene Saran, "Enquiring minds Socratic dialogue in education" (2004), Trentham books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)