본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제중재를 대비한 해외 건설 클레임 관리

Managing International Construction Claims in Preparation of International Arbitration

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The parties to an international construction contract almost always find themselves in the midst of a series of construction claims during the course of the project. These claims, if not resolved early in accordance with the dispute resolution clauses in the contract, will eventually become subject to an international arbitration. It is therefore important to prepare and manage the claims with the eventual arbitration in mind; ironically, if claims are better managed in preparation of an arbitration, they are more likely to be accepted in an early stage of the dispute resolution process. The aim of this article is to provide practical guide on how to properly prepare and manage international construction claims under the dispute resolution procedure in FIDIC construction contracts, so as to be eventually successful in the arbitration. This article first elaborates on the claim notice that a contractor has to send in order to raise a valid claim. Next, it emphasizes the importance of contemporary records and detailed particulars which are needed to substantiate the claims. The recent issue relating to the effect of a ‘binding but not final’ decision of DAB and the most recent solution provided byt FIDIC on this issue. Finally, the authors discuss the possibility and scope of changing the claims at the arbitration stage. Korean construction companies should now pay more attention to properly managing their international construction claims, and should establish a proper claim management system that includes document management system and expert aid at an early stage.

Abstract

The parties to an international construction contract almost always find themselves in the midst of a series of construction claims during the course of the project. These claims, if not resolved early in accordance with the dispute resolution clauses in the contract, will eventually become subject to an international arbitration. It is therefore important to prepare and manage the claims with the eventual arbitration in mind; ironically, if claims are better managed in preparation of an arbitration, they are more likely to be accepted in an early stage of the dispute resolution process. The aim of this article is to provide practical guide on how to properly prepare and manage international construction claims under the dispute resolution procedure in FIDIC construction contracts, so as to be eventually successful in the arbitration. This article first elaborates on the claim notice that a contractor has to send in order to raise a valid claim. Next, it emphasizes the importance of contemporary records and detailed particulars which are needed to substantiate the claims. The recent issue relating to the effect of a ‘binding but not final’ decision of DAB and the most recent solution provided byt FIDIC on this issue. Finally, the authors discuss the possibility and scope of changing the claims at the arbitration stage. Korean construction companies should now pay more attention to properly managing their international construction claims, and should establish a proper claim management system that includes document management system and expert aid at an early stage.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 해외건설사업의 클레임 사례분석을 통한 클레임 대응 방안, "건설교통부", ~ (2006)
  2. 해외공사 수행매뉴얼 작성연구-숨겨진 10% 공사이윤을 찾아서, "국토해양부", ~ (2010)
  3. 현학봉, "해외건설공사 계약관리와 클레임" (2012), (주)씨플러스인터내셔널
  4. Jaeger, "FIDIC-A Guide for Practitioners" (2010), Springer
  5. Jenkins and Stebbings, "International Construction Arbitration Law" (2006), Kluwer Law
  6. 해외건설 계약 및 클레임 관리 실태와 대응 방안, "김원태", 건설, ~ (2012)
  7. Christopher R. Seppälä, "Contractor’s Claim Under the FIDIC Contracts for Major Works", conference paper, International Construction and Dispute Resolution Conference (Cairo) (2005)
  8. Christopher R. Seppälä, "Enforcement by an Arbitral Tribunal of a Binding but Not Final Engineer’s or DAB’s Decision under the FIDIC Conditions", International Construction Law Review Volume, 26 (2009)
  9. Christopher R. Seppälä, "How Not to Interpret the FIDIC Disputes Clause: the Singapore Court of Appeal Judgment in Persero", International Construction Law Review Volume, 29 (2012)
  10. Hamish Lal, "The Rise and Rise of ‘Time-Bar’ Clauses: the ‘Real Issue for Construction Arbitrators", International Construction Law Review Volume, 24 (2007)
  11. Nicholas Gould, "Making claims for time and money-understanding of notice provisions", Fenwick Elliot (2008)
  12. Frederic Gillion, "Enforcement of DAB Decisions under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract: A Recent Development: CRW Joint Operation v. PT Peninsula Gas Negara (Persero) TBK", International Construction Law Review Volume, 28 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)