건설산업에서의 ADR 활성화 방안
A Study on the Efficiency of the Alternative Dispute Resolution in Construction Industry
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Disputes in human society is inevitable. The last resort to resolve these disputes was the litigation. However, due to the excessive cost, time consumption of the court procedures, it has a limit on the relief of citizen's rights and interests. In these circumstances, there are increasing needs of realization of administrative purposes and relief of citizen's rights by the flexible resolution of disputes, and active utilizing the dispute resolution measures rather than the litigation by the court. The interests in Alternative Dispute Resolution which has shown in the other countries such as USA, can be said that these requests are reflected. Construction claim has the characteristic that it once filed, has the big amount claimed and various issues and complexity of case. This characteristic inevitably requires long period and much money to resolve the problem. Therefore, the methods which can resolve the dispute with reducing the conflict between the parties and less cost in a short period are earnest, and these requests can be met with ADR. Then, this study will examine the mediation and arbitration mainly among the negotiation, settlement mediation and arbitration which are used as the type of ADR in Korea, and suggest the problem of those measures and improvement measures. Although many institutes for the arbitration are organized according to the enactment of regulations, but their purposes are not met with them, so with considering current status, diagnosed the problems and proposed the effective operating methods of construction conflicts. In these meaning, this study focused on the legal and systemic aspect rather than technical aspect. In there of, the following study is conducted and improved, it is expected to be helpful to the industries business management.
Abstract
Disputes in human society is inevitable. The last resort to resolve these disputes was the litigation. However, due to the excessive cost, time consumption of the court procedures, it has a limit on the relief of citizen's rights and interests. In these circumstances, there are increasing needs of realization of administrative purposes and relief of citizen's rights by the flexible resolution of disputes, and active utilizing the dispute resolution measures rather than the litigation by the court. The interests in Alternative Dispute Resolution which has shown in the other countries such as USA, can be said that these requests are reflected. Construction claim has the characteristic that it once filed, has the big amount claimed and various issues and complexity of case. This characteristic inevitably requires long period and much money to resolve the problem. Therefore, the methods which can resolve the dispute with reducing the conflict between the parties and less cost in a short period are earnest, and these requests can be met with ADR. Then, this study will examine the mediation and arbitration mainly among the negotiation, settlement mediation and arbitration which are used as the type of ADR in Korea, and suggest the problem of those measures and improvement measures. Although many institutes for the arbitration are organized according to the enactment of regulations, but their purposes are not met with them, so with considering current status, diagnosed the problems and proposed the effective operating methods of construction conflicts. In these meaning, this study focused on the legal and systemic aspect rather than technical aspect. In there of, the following study is conducted and improved, it is expected to be helpful to the industries business management.
참고문헌 (65)
- 강이수, "국제거래분쟁론" (1999), 삼영사
- 곽영용, "최신 상사중재론" (2001), 대한상사중재인협회
- 고범준, "국제상사중재법 해의" (1985), 대한상사중재원
- 구재동, "건설분쟁의 예방" (1997), 토공회보(신년호)
- 김경배, "조정합의 성립의 경정요인에 관한 실중적 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 김명기, "선택적 중재합의에 관한 판례연구" (2003), 대한상사중재원
- 김연호, "“정부건설공사계약 중재종항의 재해석”, 중재논총(중재03-01, 2001∼2002)", ~ (2001)
- 김정순, "행정법상 재판외 분쟁해결 법제연구" (2006), 한국법제연구원
- 남진권, "건설공사 클레임과 분쟁실무" (2003), 기문당
- 두성규, "“건설분야의 중재활성화 방안”, 중재(제303호), 2002", ~ (2002)
- 목영준, "중재에 있어서 법원의 역할에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 문장록, "“중재판정의 집행력에 대하여”, 대한상사중재원 제2차건설중재인포럼, 2004", ~ (2004)
- 박세일, "법경제학" (2000), 박영사
- , 한국사법행정학회, 1999, , 1999
- 백준홍, "“국내 건설공사에 있어서 클레임의 처리현황과 문제점 분석 및 개선방향”, 건설협회건설클레임세미나, 1999", ~ (1999)
- 서순복, "거버넌스 상황에서 갈등관리를 위한 대체적 분쟁해결제도" (2005), 집문당
- 서정일, "중재합의의 실체적 판단에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 24(1) (2005)
- 송상현, "소송에 갈음하는 분쟁해결방안의 이념과 전망 in:민사판례연구(ⅩIⅤ)" (1992), 박영사
- 양병회, "주석 중재법", 대한상사중재원 (2005), 대한상사중재학회
- 유병현, "“우리나라 ADR의 발전방향”, 사법개혁추진위원회토론자료, 2006", ~ (2006)
- 윤재윤, "건설분쟁관계법" (2007), 박영사
- 이무종, "건설중재에 대한 소고", 대한중재인협회보, (5) (2003)
- 이인근, "클레임, 어떻게 대처할 것인가" (1998), 일간건설
- 이주원, "“한국조정제도의 발전방향”, 정기중재세미나 발표논문,2002", ~ (2002)
- 이희정, "국민참여에 의한 행정분쟁해결”, 한국법학원 법학심포지엄 토론문, 2004" (2004)
- 장재형, "“건설산업의 상생적 발전을 위한 효율적인 분쟁해결에 관한 세미나”, 대한토목학회ㆍ대한상사중재원, 2005", ~ (2005)
- 조대현, "국가를 당사자로 하는 계약의 분쟁해결 방안" (2002), 국회사무처
- 조병훈, "재판상 화해의 법적 성질과 효력 in: 기남 이중범교수정년기념논문집" (2003)
- 전병서, "대체적 분쟁해결제도(ADR) 도입방안" (2005), 사법제도개혁추진위원회
- 전병서, "“조정절차에 관한 국제적 동향”, 변호사(제35집), 2005", ~ (2005)
- 정주환, "한국경제법" (1997), 세창출판사
- 정택수, "중재조항에 대한 소고", 우리법연구회 논문집(Ⅱ) (2003)
- 채완병, "우리나라 건설중재 현황과 활성화 방안", 중재연구, 14(2) (2004)
- 최장호, "상사분쟁관리론" (2003), 두남
- 홍성규, "국제상사중재" (2002), 두남
- 건설교통부, "건설교통백서(2003∼2005), 2007", ~ (2007)
- 건설교통부, "건축분쟁ㆍ민원 통합관리시스템마련을 위한 연구" (2007), 대한주택공사
- 건설교통부, "건설분쟁조정위원회 활성화 방안" (2002)
- 공정거래위원회, "2006년 통계연감", ~ (2006)
- "대한상사중재원, 조정제도, 2001", ~ (2001)
- "사법연수원, ADR, 2001", ~ (2001)
- "사법제도개혁추진위원회 백서, 2005", ~ (2005)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "“재판외 분쟁해결제도 활성화 방안 참고자료”, 2006", ~ (2006)
- 환경부, "환경백서, 2006", ~ (2006)
- 落 美都里, "裁判外紛爭解決手續(ADR)制度" (2005), 國會立法圖書
- 和田仁孝, "自律型 ADRモデル新展開", ADRの實際と理論(Ⅱ) (2005)
- 猪股孝史, "仲裁と調停 in: ADRの實際と理論(Ⅰ)", 日本比較法硏究, 62 (2003), 中央大學校出版部
- 小島武司, "ADR?仲裁法敎室" (2001), 有斐閣
- 大?一武, "國際商社仲裁の理論と實務", 中央經濟社
- 加藤和夫, "公害等調整委員會及び都道府縣公害審査會における公害紛爭の解決 in: ADRの實際と理論(Ⅱ)."
- 猪股孝史, "ADRの實際と理論(Ⅰ)", 日本比較法硏究, 62 (2003), 央大學校出版部
- "Christian Bu?hring-Uhle, Arbitration and Mediation in International Business(Second Edition), Kluwer Law International, 2006", ~ (2006)
- Donahey. M.S, "International Mediation and Conciliation, The Alterative Dispute Resolution Practice Guide, Lawyers Cooperative Publishing", ~
- Edward Brunet, "Arbitration Law in America a Critical Assessment" (2006), Cambridge Univ.Press
- Edward R. Fisk, "Construction Projest Administration" (2000), Prentice Hall
- Irwin J. Schiffres, "New Topic Service-Alternative Dispute Resolution" (1985), Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co.
- John K. Sykes, "Construction Claims" (1999), London Sweet & Maxwell
- Johnson, S.H., "The Intergration of Non-Litigious Dispute Resolution Material in to the Five-Year Property Course" (1985), NIDS`Series
- Joseph T. McLaughlin, "Alternative Dispute Resolution" (1993), The American Law Institute
- Mackie, Karl J., "Dispute Resolution: The New Wave"
- Michael Waring, "Commercial Dispute Resolution" (2006), College of Law Publishing
- Robert Coulson, "Professional Mediation of Civil Disputes" (1984), American Arbitration Association
- "Roger Fisher and William Ury, Getting to YES; Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In(2nd edition), Penguin, USA, 1991", ~ (1991)
- Russel Caller, "ADR and Commercial Disputes" (2002), London Sweet & Maxwell
- Vincent Powell-Smith, "Building Contracts Claims" (1984), Granada Publishing Ltd.