본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

담배관련 세제 인상의 가계지출 및 소득분배 파급효과 분석

An Analysis on both the Expenditure and the Income Distributive Effect of Increase in Tobacco-related Tax Rate

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

Our study calculates the rate of tobacco expenditure to total consumption by each decile, and then examines if an increase in tobacco price has an impact on its expense and tax burden by decile, under assumptions of price elasticities in previous works, and finallymeasures income inequality indexes and regressivities by Kakwani index after its price increase through a tax rate increase, using 2009 National Survey of Tax and Benefit. Empirical results are as follows: First, a tobacco expenditure in most deciles, except for the first and the second decile, amounts to 70 Korean thousand Won. The rate of it to total consumption is the highest of 13.35%in the first decile, and themore income the less the rate. It means that the lowest class expends the tobacco excessively. Second, we divided into two cases in accordance with differences of price elasticities between income deciles, and then analyzed both household expenditure portfolios and income redistributive effects of two cases. In case 1, which is a wide difference of price elasticities between poor classes and non-poor ones (elasticities of 0.5 in the low class and 0.2 in the rest classes, on average 0.3), empirical results say that the quantity demanded of tobacco by poor deciles, in case of a raise in price by 100%,decreases more than in case of 50%, and thus the tobacco expenditure does not increase, while the tobacco-related taxes rise a bit. It implies that the cigarette price increase of 100% with tax is not likely to deteriorate the household expenditure patterns and after-tax income inequality, meaning the income distribution improvement. However, case 2 (elasticities of 0.3 in the lowclass and 0.4 in the rest classes) shows that tobacco-related taxes deteriorate the income distribution and it results in higher regresstivity relative to case 1. These implies that it is needed to give a special attention to an equity issue in a cigarette price hike, which would be effective for cutting back a smoking rate.

Abstract

Our study calculates the rate of tobacco expenditure to total consumption by each decile, and then examines if an increase in tobacco price has an impact on its expense and tax burden by decile, under assumptions of price elasticities in previous works, and finallymeasures income inequality indexes and regressivities by Kakwani index after its price increase through a tax rate increase, using 2009 National Survey of Tax and Benefit. Empirical results are as follows: First, a tobacco expenditure in most deciles, except for the first and the second decile, amounts to 70 Korean thousand Won. The rate of it to total consumption is the highest of 13.35%in the first decile, and themore income the less the rate. It means that the lowest class expends the tobacco excessively. Second, we divided into two cases in accordance with differences of price elasticities between income deciles, and then analyzed both household expenditure portfolios and income redistributive effects of two cases. In case 1, which is a wide difference of price elasticities between poor classes and non-poor ones (elasticities of 0.5 in the low class and 0.2 in the rest classes, on average 0.3), empirical results say that the quantity demanded of tobacco by poor deciles, in case of a raise in price by 100%,decreases more than in case of 50%, and thus the tobacco expenditure does not increase, while the tobacco-related taxes rise a bit. It implies that the cigarette price increase of 100% with tax is not likely to deteriorate the household expenditure patterns and after-tax income inequality, meaning the income distribution improvement. However, case 2 (elasticities of 0.3 in the lowclass and 0.4 in the rest classes) shows that tobacco-related taxes deteriorate the income distribution and it results in higher regresstivity relative to case 1. These implies that it is needed to give a special attention to an equity issue in a cigarette price hike, which would be effective for cutting back a smoking rate.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 강은정, "담배가격의 효율성과 형평성 분석", 보건복지포럼, pp.22~37 (2009), 한국보건사회연구원
  2. 김원년, "담배가격인상이 흡연 수요에 미치는 영향", 한국인구학, 29(2), pp.195~214 (2006), 한국인구학회
  3. 민희철, "이산선택 모델을 이용한 담배제품 수요추정", 재정포럼, (12) (2007)
  4. 민희철, "가구의 담배 구매 여부 및 수요량 결정에 대한 분석", 한국재정학회 춘계학술대회 발표 논문 (2012)
  5. 민희철, "소득이 담배수요에 미치는 효과의 분석", 한국재정학회 추계학술대회 발표 논문 (2012)
  6. 물가연동세제의 도입 연구, "성명재", 한국조세연구원, ~, pp.2008-12 (2008)
  7. 김성준, "담뱃세 인상정책의 흡연억제 효과-시계열자료를 통한 실증분석-", 규제연구, 16(2), pp.81~102 (2007), 한국규제학회
  8. 이영, "한국의 시계열자료를 이용한 담배수요의 가격탄력성 추정", 한국경제연구, 19, pp.151~172 (2007), 한국경제연구학회
  9. 담배관련 제세의 물가연동방안에 관한 연구, "임주영", 서울시립대 지방세연구소, ~ (2008)
  10. 통계청, "2010년 사회조사", ~ (2011)
  11. 흡연율 감소를 위한 정부정책의 타당성 검토와 과제, "허종호", 국회입법조사처, ~, pp.이슈와 논점(제94호) (2010)
  12. Farrelly, Matthew C., "Responses by Adults in Cigarette Prices by Socio-demographicCharacteristics", Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), pp.156~165 (2001)
  13. Kakwani, "Income Inequality and Poverty: Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications" (1980), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)