拜登政府的对华政策走向及应对
Biden Administration’s China Policy Trend and Countermeasures
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文主要分析了拜登政府对华政策的具体转变、调整原因及所处困境，进而分析其对华政策走向以及中国的应对措施。特朗普执政时期中美关系持续恶化，但其方式手段单一。拜登上台后，因受国内舆论、疫情防控、国家利益、中国实力提升等多方面因素的影响，在对华政策的选择上与特朗普政府的“全面遏制”战略存在着很强的延续性甚至是超越性，手段更为复杂，提出了合作与对抗并存的“弹性遏制”战略。具体表现为重拾人权问题、加强盟友关系、重返国际组织、强调自身实力、选择性与中国进行合作等，但在对华政策上，竞争依旧是主旋律。对此，笔者认为，中国应继续坚持独立自主的和平外交政策，努力加强与邻国的友好合作，进而推动中美新型大国关系的构建。
Abstract
This paper mainly analyzes the specific changes, adjustment reasons and difficulties of Biden administration’s China policy, and then analyzes the trend of Biden administration’s China policy and China’s countermeasures. During Trump’s administration, China US relations continued to deteriorate, but their ways and means were single. After Biden took office, due to the influence of domestic public opinion, epidemic prevention and control, national interests, China’s strength improvement and other factors, there is a strong continuity or even transcendence between the choice of China policy and the trump administration’s “comprehensive containment” strategy, and the means are more complex. He put forward a “flexible containment” strategy of cooperation and confrontation, The specific manifestations are to regain human rights issues, strengthen alliance relations, return to international organizations, emphasize their own strength and selectively cooperate with China. However, competition is still the main theme in China policy. In this regard, the author believes that China should continue to adhere to an independent foreign policy of peace, strive to strengthen friendly cooperation with its neighbors, and then promote the construction of a new type of major country relationship between China and the United States.
참고문헌 (18)
- Doran, C., "Biden Doctrine should remake foreign policy, not reins take it", The Hill, ~ (2021)
- Hass, R., "Stronger : Updating American Strategy to Outpace an Ambitious andAscendant China" (2021), Yale University Press
- Olsen, H., "Joe Biden Hasn’t Lifted Trump’s Tariffs on China. Good", TheWashington Post, ~ (2021)
- Rowley, A., "Biden must seek a new balance of equals in Asia to avert aUS-China partition", South China Morning Post, ~ (2021)
- Swanson, A., "Bide on ‘Short Leash’ as Administration Rethinks ChinaRelations", The New York Times, ~ (2021)
- Zakaria, F., "China-US rivalry poses world’s greatest challenge, but we canprosper", The Sydney Morning Herald, ~ (2020)
- 陈佳, "拜登时代的中美关系 : 趋势与应对", 思想政治课教学, 5, pp.54~58 (2021)
- 达巍, "拜登政府执政后的美国对外政策 : 继承与转向", 当代美国评论, 3, pp.1~19 (2021)[DOI]
- 樊⾼⽉, "美国印太战略及其实施与影响", 东北亚经济研究, 5, pp.99~112 (2021)
- 凌胜利, "拜登政府的‘技术联盟’：动因、内容与挑战", 国际论坛, 23, pp.3~25 (2021)[DOI]
- 李义虎, "拜登对华战略中的对台政策 : 战略定位与战略竞争", 台湾研究, 3, pp.1~9 (2021)
- 孟秋, "中美经济合作的新领域 : 气候变化", 中国对外贸易, 3, pp.1~ (2021)
- 王帆, "拜登政府的对华战略 : 竞争性共存与新平衡", 和平与发展, 4, pp.1~25 (2021)[DOI]
- 王秋怡, "美国对华政策转变及中国的战略选择", 和平与发展, 2, pp.83~98 (2021)[DOI]
- 吴⼼伯, "拜登执政与中美战略竞争⾛向", 国际问题研究, 2, pp.34~48 (2021)[DOI]
- 杨⽂静, "拜登百⽇新政评析", 现代国际关系, 5, pp.1~8 (2021)[DOI]
- 杨震, "‘印太战略’框架下的美印海权合作", 南亚研究, 3, pp.21~36 (2021)[DOI]
- 叶成城, "拜登政府价值观联盟战略初探", 现代国际关系, 9, pp.11~17 (2021)