통사구조의 의미해석과 화용론 관계 고찰
A Study of the relationship between Semantic Interpretation and Pragmatics in Syntax
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper deals with the relationship between syntactic structure and semantic interpretation. Since the so-called Aspects model (or Standard Theory Model), there has been some changes in the ideas of the semantic interpretation of a sentence; in the Aspect model there is only one chance for the semantic interpretation. But for the Minimalism model of interpretation, Gallego(2010) suggests each Phase can enter the interpretation component any time. With the examples of English and Korean reflexive pronouns, and the English transparent free relatives, I have argued that a monolithic one-way entrance of a sentence into the semantic interpretation has problems. Thus I propose that pragmatic information can get into the semantic component freely, equally, and frequently, and the combined semantic information can go back to the syntactic structure and get into the semantic component again.
Abstract
This paper deals with the relationship between syntactic structure and semantic interpretation. Since the so-called Aspects model (or Standard Theory Model), there has been some changes in the ideas of the semantic interpretation of a sentence; in the Aspect model there is only one chance for the semantic interpretation. But for the Minimalism model of interpretation, Gallego(2010) suggests each Phase can enter the interpretation component any time. With the examples of English and Korean reflexive pronouns, and the English transparent free relatives, I have argued that a monolithic one-way entrance of a sentence into the semantic interpretation has problems. Thus I propose that pragmatic information can get into the semantic component freely, equally, and frequently, and the combined semantic information can go back to the syntactic structure and get into the semantic component again.
참고문헌 (18)
- 엄홍준, "한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성", 언어, 39(4), pp.899~919 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- , antecedent, binding theory, local domain,
- 최기용, "피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.325~364 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 최기용, "‘자기’ 재검토: 엄홍준(2014), 허세문(2014)에 답한다", 생성문법연구, 25(4), pp.801~824 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris Pub
- Gallego, A., "Phase Theor" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- 하승완, "A Sideward Movement Analysis of Transparent Free Relatives", 언어, 37(3), pp.737~756 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Haegeman, L., "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1995), Blackwell
- Kayne, R, "The Anti-Symmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- 김종복, "English Transparent Free Relatives: Interactions between the Lexicon and Constructions", 영어학연구, 17(2), pp.153~181 (2011), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- 김재민, "On the Syntactic Structure of the Transparent Relative Clause", 현대문법연구, (91), pp.133~150 (2016), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Kuno, S., "Functional Syntax" (1987), Chicago Univ. Press
- Lidz, J., "Condition R", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.439~492 (2001)
- 윌리엄오그래디, "Processing and Language Acquisition: Reflexive Pronouns in English and Korean", 언어와 정보 사회, 19, pp.33~59 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Radford, A., "English Syntax" (2004), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Stroik, T., "Extraposition and Expletive-Movement: A Minimalist Account", Lingua, 99, pp.237~251 (1996)
- Van Riemsdijk, H., "Blackwell Companion to Syntax II", pp.338~382 (2006), Blackwell
- Van Riemsdijk, H., "Introduction to the Therory of Grammar" (1986), The MIT Press