음운과 단어 수준에서의 남북한 수어 대조언어학적 고찰
Contrastive Linguistic Study on South and North Korean Sign Language at the level of Phoneme and Lexis
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the phonological and lexical characteristics of South and North Korean Sign Language in terms of contrastive linguistics. The results are following. First, in coincidence of two sign languages, the result indicates 29% of agreement, 37% of partial agreement, and 34% of disagreement. It is evident to show linguistic heterogeneity does affect coincidence of two sign language because of division of Korea into south and north for a long time. Also, this study analyzes coincidence of five parameters in two sign languages. The highest coincidence of five parameters is LOCATION, then (palm) ORIENTATION, HANDSHAPE, and MOVEMENT in order. Second, this study analyzes frequency of five parameters between two sign languages. The results indicate that the LOCATION, MOVEMENT, and ORIENTATION are used in similar way, but the use of HANDSHPAE shows partially in different way. Mostly, HANDSAHPs such as NINE, FIST, AND ONE are used in two sign languages. The frequency of LOCATION shows neutral place, palm, palm/near place, edge of hand, and back of hand in order. The most used of MOVEMENT shows repetitive movement, close movement, touch linking action, vertical action: downward movement, vertical action: upward movement in order. In last, the aspect of ORIENTATION produces backward, downward, leftward, upward, and rightward in order. Third, the results of compounding indicate that North Korean Sign Language produced more simultaneous compound than South Korean Sign Language. We find that the aspect of sequential compound is combined in different word order. There are 33% of True Friends and 15 % of False Friends in two sign languages.
Abstract
This study explores the phonological and lexical characteristics of South and North Korean Sign Language in terms of contrastive linguistics. The results are following. First, in coincidence of two sign languages, the result indicates 29% of agreement, 37% of partial agreement, and 34% of disagreement. It is evident to show linguistic heterogeneity does affect coincidence of two sign language because of division of Korea into south and north for a long time. Also, this study analyzes coincidence of five parameters in two sign languages. The highest coincidence of five parameters is LOCATION, then (palm) ORIENTATION, HANDSHAPE, and MOVEMENT in order. Second, this study analyzes frequency of five parameters between two sign languages. The results indicate that the LOCATION, MOVEMENT, and ORIENTATION are used in similar way, but the use of HANDSHPAE shows partially in different way. Mostly, HANDSAHPs such as NINE, FIST, AND ONE are used in two sign languages. The frequency of LOCATION shows neutral place, palm, palm/near place, edge of hand, and back of hand in order. The most used of MOVEMENT shows repetitive movement, close movement, touch linking action, vertical action: downward movement, vertical action: upward movement in order. In last, the aspect of ORIENTATION produces backward, downward, leftward, upward, and rightward in order. Third, the results of compounding indicate that North Korean Sign Language produced more simultaneous compound than South Korean Sign Language. We find that the aspect of sequential compound is combined in different word order. There are 33% of True Friends and 15 % of False Friends in two sign languages.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김기석, "대조언어학과 언어유형론", 국제한국언어문화학회 제21차 국제학술대회, pp.24~37 (2016)
- 김태수, "한국수화와 북한손말의 어휘 비교 : 「한국수화사전」과 북한 「손말사전」을 중심으로", 석사, 국제수화통역학, pp.2009
- 서정목, "영어와 독일어의 역사비교언어학과 대조언어학" (2009), 한국학술정보
- 서준환, "한국수화의 지역 차에 관한 조사 연구", 석사, 청각장애교육, pp.2004
- 송기중, "역사비교언어학과 국어계통론" (2004), 집문당
- 안태성, "손말사전-롱아학교용" (2005), 교육도서출판사
- 윤남, "한국수화언어의 소멸, 변이, 생성의 특성 연구", 석사, pp.2018
- 이난희, "북한수어의 수형 분석", 특수교육재활과학연구, 56(1), pp.75~96 (2017), 특수교육재활과학연구소[DOI]
- 이준우, "한국 수어학 개론" (2014), 나남
- 張鎭權, "韓國 手話의 語源的 意味", 석사, 특수교육, pp.1996
- 최상배, "한국수화언어의 수형소 분석", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 13(1), pp.233~256 (2012), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 최상배, "한국수화언어의 수위소 분석", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 14(2), pp.1~20 (2013), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 최상배, "한국수화언어 수동소 유형과 특징", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 16(1), pp.219~236 (2015), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 최상배, "한국수화언어 수향소 분석", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 16(2), pp.391~408 (2015), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 허용, "대조언어학" (2018), 소통
- Dye, M., "Laboratory Phonology 8. (Phonology and Phonetics, 4)", pp.243~263, Mouton de Gruyter
- Lucas, C., "Sign language research: Theoretical issues" (1990), Gallaudet University Press
- Lucas, C., "The sociolinguistics of sign language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Shaw, E., "New perspectives on the history of American Sign Language", Sign Language Studies, 11(2), pp.158~204 (2010)
- Valli, C., "Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction" (2005), Clerc Books
- "주제 및 상황 범주별 찾기-초급단어" (2019)[URL]