본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 ‘생명 과학 I’ 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 분석

Analysis of Science Writing Activities in ‘Life Science I’ Textbooks according to the 2015 Revised Curriculum

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

Science writing activities are emphasized to develop scientific thinking ability and communication skills. The purpose of this study was to analyze the science writing activities according to the unit and publishing company in 7 kinds of ‘Life Science I’ textbooks according to the 2015 revised curriculum in terms of the type of science writing requiring scientific thinking ability, presented sites, presented forms and topic. A total of 122 science writing activities were presented in 7 kinds of ‘Life Science I’ textbooks. The science writing activities requiring deductive thinking ability were presented 51 times, and those requiring creative thinking ability were 16 times. As a result of analyzing according to publishing company, the frequency of scientific writing activities was a maximum of 28 times and a minimum of 10 times, and the rest of the textbooks were similar to 16 times, and the types of scientific writing activities varied depending on publishing company. The science writing activities were the most presented in the site of ‘Inquiry activities’, followed by the ‘Unit summary’ and the least presented in the site of ‘Formative evaluation’. As a result of analyzing the presentation forms, ‘presented text+decorative illustration+question’ was the most, followed by ‘data+question’, and ‘data+explanation of data+question’ was not presented. As a result of analyzing the type of science writing requiring scientific thinking ability according to the topic and publishing company, the topics of science writing activities were variously presented according to each unit. The various science writing activities should be presented in ‘Life Science I’ textbooks.

Abstract

Science writing activities are emphasized to develop scientific thinking ability and communication skills. The purpose of this study was to analyze the science writing activities according to the unit and publishing company in 7 kinds of ‘Life Science I’ textbooks according to the 2015 revised curriculum in terms of the type of science writing requiring scientific thinking ability, presented sites, presented forms and topic. A total of 122 science writing activities were presented in 7 kinds of ‘Life Science I’ textbooks. The science writing activities requiring deductive thinking ability were presented 51 times, and those requiring creative thinking ability were 16 times. As a result of analyzing according to publishing company, the frequency of scientific writing activities was a maximum of 28 times and a minimum of 10 times, and the rest of the textbooks were similar to 16 times, and the types of scientific writing activities varied depending on publishing company. The science writing activities were the most presented in the site of ‘Inquiry activities’, followed by the ‘Unit summary’ and the least presented in the site of ‘Formative evaluation’. As a result of analyzing the presentation forms, ‘presented text+decorative illustration+question’ was the most, followed by ‘data+question’, and ‘data+explanation of data+question’ was not presented. As a result of analyzing the type of science writing requiring scientific thinking ability according to the topic and publishing company, the topics of science writing activities were variously presented according to each unit. The various science writing activities should be presented in ‘Life Science I’ textbooks.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 배희숙, "과학 탐구 능력 신장을 위한 과학 글쓰기 교수․학습 전략 개발", 초등과학교육, 28(2), pp.178~186 (2009), 한국초등과학교육학회
  2. Cho, H., "Natural Science Writing : Methods and Functions" (2014), Koyookgwahaksa
  3. Cho, H., "Theories of Science Education" (2018), Koyookgwahaksa
  4. Cheon, J., "Science writing activities for developing scientific thinking", Master’s, pp.2006
  5. 천재훈, "과학 글쓰기에 나타난 창의적 사고기능의 유형 분석- 중학교 과학교과서를 중심으로 -", 교육과정평가연구, 7(2), pp.285~304 (2004), 한국교육과정평가원
  6. Hand, B., "Using the science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science : Quantitative and qualitative aspects", International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), pp.131~149 (2004)
  7. Hayes, J., "The Science of Writing" (1996), Lawrence Erbaum Assiciates Publishers
  8. 장경화, "학생들의 글쓰기에 나타난 논의구조에 미치는 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동의 효과 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(7), pp.1099~1108 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
  9. Jeon, S., "Science for All Koreans" (2018), Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity
  10. 정민이, "2009 개정 고등학교 과학교과서의 과학글쓰기 활동 분석 : 글쓰기 유형, 형태, 과학적 소양, 비판적 사고를 중심으로", 생물교육, 41(1), pp.119~134 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  11. Keys, C. W., "Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigation in secondary science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), pp.1065~1084 (1999)
  12. 김소연, "중학교 과학 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 20(4), pp.53~76 (2017), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
  13. 구슬기, "초등 과학 글쓰기 지도 전략의 개발 및 적용", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.427~440 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
  14. 이규희, "2007 개정·2009 개정 중학교 과학 교과서 화학영역에 사용된 과학 글쓰기 문항의 비교 분석", 대한화학회지, 58(6), pp.600~611 (2014), 대한화학회[DOI]
  15. Lee, H., "The prior knowledge and misconception of elementary pupils using science writing", Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 8(3), pp.421~435 (2004)
  16. 이정은, "생물Ⅰ과 생명 과학Ⅰ교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 16(3), pp.53~71 (2013), 한국교육과정평가원
  17. 이정은, "생명 과학Ⅰ 수업에서 과학 글쓰기 활동이 고등학생의 과학적 사고력에 미치는 영향", 과학교육연구지, 37(3), pp.476~491 (2013), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
  18. Lee, K. N., "Effects of constructivistic learning strategy on middle school students’ learning of scientific conception learning and scientific attitudes - Focused on science writing -", Doctoral, pp.2007
  19. 이선경, "학교 과학에서 과학 글쓰기의 위상과 교육적 의미", 교육문화연구, 23(6), pp.297~316 (2017), 교육연구소[DOI]
  20. Lemke, J. L., "Talking Science : Language, Learning, and Values" (1990), Ablex
  21. MOE(Ministry of Education), "Science Curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
  22. 남경운, "과학일기쓰기가 과학영재의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1272~1282 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  23. National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards", National Academy Press, ~ (1995)
  24. Norris, S., "How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy", Science Education, 87(2), pp.224~240 (2003)
  25. 박지영, "초등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 선호 유형 조사-생명 영역을 중심으로-", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.600~609 (2008), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  26. 박길순, "2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 과학 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 제시 양상 분석", 과학교육연구지, 38(2), pp.344~355 (2014), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
  27. Prain, V., "Writing for learning in secondary science : Rethinking practices", Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), pp.179~201 (1996)
  28. 신지원, "논의 및 과학 글쓰기 관련 국내 과학 교육 연구 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(2), pp.107~122 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  29. 손정우, "과학글쓰기를 통한 과학영재학생들의 과학적 사고력과창의적 문제해결력 연구", 과학영재교육, 1(3), pp.21~32 (2009), 한국과학영재교육학회
  30. Yore, L., "Examining the literacy component of science literacy : 25 years of language arts and science research", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.689~725 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)