2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I 교과서에 제시된 글쓰기 문제 유형에 따른 구조화 연구
A Study on the Structure of Writing Problem Types in 2015 Revised Curriculum 『Life Science I』 Textbook
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a growing interest in science writing in terms of the cultivation of creative problem solving skills. Accordingly, studies on the development of science writing materials are being conducted focusing on the unit of the 2015 revised curriculum Life Science I. If the developed writing materials are introduced into the actual secondary school classes, they can be used as effective teaching- learning strategies to enhance students' creative problem solving skills. Therefore, it is important to find ways to apply science writing development materials to actual classes. This study examined the ways to utilize science writing in actual classes through the structure of writing according to the type of writing materials presented in the textbook of Life Science I. In particular, the structure of science writing in this study was designed to link the methods of explaining and solving problems through scientific thinking based on the basic structure of expository texts and essays dealt with in Korean language. In the previous studies, science writing types are divided into explanatory and argumentative science writing types, explanatory types are classified into explanatory explanation, comparative contrast, causal analysis, goal-oriented type, and argumentative type is subdivided into hypothetical argument, evaluation criticism, ideal presentation, advocacy argument, and opinion presentation type. The purpose of this study is to suggest the writing structure according to the writing types of explanatory and argumentative forms, and as a result, it is designed to present the writing structure according to the goals of each writing based on the basic structure of introduction, main subject, and conclusion according to the writing type. If the education to make the framework of writing is continuously done through the structure of writing in school classes, it is thought that students will be able to improve their problem solving ability more actively and creatively by increasing their understanding of the presentation materials based on the topics related to the science field and actively utilizing them in the writing process. In the future, it is expected that the structured writing materials will be applied to students through teaching-learning strategies through the development of overall science writing programs, and that the actual writing will be implemented and embodied through evaluation, thereby being used as an effective and practical science writing education program.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in science writing in terms of the cultivation of creative problem solving skills. Accordingly, studies on the development of science writing materials are being conducted focusing on the unit of the 2015 revised curriculum Life Science I. If the developed writing materials are introduced into the actual secondary school classes, they can be used as effective teaching- learning strategies to enhance students' creative problem solving skills. Therefore, it is important to find ways to apply science writing development materials to actual classes. This study examined the ways to utilize science writing in actual classes through the structure of writing according to the type of writing materials presented in the textbook of Life Science I. In particular, the structure of science writing in this study was designed to link the methods of explaining and solving problems through scientific thinking based on the basic structure of expository texts and essays dealt with in Korean language. In the previous studies, science writing types are divided into explanatory and argumentative science writing types, explanatory types are classified into explanatory explanation, comparative contrast, causal analysis, goal-oriented type, and argumentative type is subdivided into hypothetical argument, evaluation criticism, ideal presentation, advocacy argument, and opinion presentation type. The purpose of this study is to suggest the writing structure according to the writing types of explanatory and argumentative forms, and as a result, it is designed to present the writing structure according to the goals of each writing based on the basic structure of introduction, main subject, and conclusion according to the writing type. If the education to make the framework of writing is continuously done through the structure of writing in school classes, it is thought that students will be able to improve their problem solving ability more actively and creatively by increasing their understanding of the presentation materials based on the topics related to the science field and actively utilizing them in the writing process. In the future, it is expected that the structured writing materials will be applied to students through teaching-learning strategies through the development of overall science writing programs, and that the actual writing will be implemented and embodied through evaluation, thereby being used as an effective and practical science writing education program.
참고문헌 (21)
- Gray, S. D., "Socio-scientific issues in science education: Implications for the professional development of teachers", Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), pp.171~192 (2006)
- Gunei, M., "Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students' conceptual understanding of biology", Learning and Instruction, 19(4), pp.354~367 (2009)
- 정민이, "2009 개정 고등학교 과학교과서의 과학글쓰기 활동 분석 : 글쓰기 유형, 형태, 과학적 소양, 비판적 사고를 중심으로", 생물교육, 41(1), pp.119~134 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Ko, S., "A model for expository argumentative themedevelopment and reading education", Text Linguistics, 7, pp.339~369 (1999)
- 김두혁, "예비 과학교사들이 작성한 논증 글쓰기의서론 구조 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(1), pp.1~19 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 김소연, "중학교 과학 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 분석", 교육과정평가연구, 20(4), pp.53~76 (2017), 한국교육과정평가원[DOI]
- Kim, H., "Developing writing materials to enhance creative problem solving", Master, pp.2018
- 김형미, "2015 개정 교육과정 생명과학 I 교과서 글쓰기 문항 분석 및 교수-학습 자료 개발", 생물교육, 47(2), pp.171~186 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 김정훈, "과학기술 글쓰기 교육의 현황과 보완 방향", 한국문학이론과 비평, 23(2), pp.163~185 (2019), 한국문학이론과비평학회[DOI]
- 구슬기, "초등 과학 글쓰기 지도 전략의 개발 및 적용", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.427~440 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Lee, D., "Explaining and disputing as contents of writing education", Language Education Discussion, 9, pp.49~101 (1986)
- Lee, E., "A study on the indicators of writing ability", Education of Korean Language, 15, pp.375~404 (2002)
- 이소의, "대학생 글쓰기의 문제해결형 개요짜기 모델 연구", 순천향 인문과학논총, 37(4), pp.63~90 (2018), 인문학연구소[DOI]
- 이선경, "학교 과학에서 과학 글쓰기의 위상과 교육적 의미", 교육문화연구, 23(6), pp.297~316 (2017), 교육연구소[DOI]
- Luke, A., "A model for researchbased state professional development policy", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), pp.231~251 (2009)
- 남진숙, "PBL 수업계획 및 문제개발 연구 -‘글의 진술방식’을 중심으로-", 사고와표현, 12(1), pp.138~166 (2019), 한국사고와표현학회[DOI]
- 박은혜, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 ‘생명 과학 I’ 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 분석", 생물교육, 46(4), pp.556~573 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Shin, H., "Developmental tendency of writing expression ability", Education Research, 30, pp.21~41 (2007)
- 송신철, "생명과학 관련 주제에 대한 과학영재들의 글쓰기 특성 분석", 과학교육연구지, 39(1), pp.88~98 (2015), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Williams, J. M., "The Craft of Argument" (2007), Longman Publishing Group
- Wellington, J. M., "Language and Literacy in Science Education" (2001), Open University Press
