경찰작용의 민관협력과 행위형식의 변화

Abstract

This study examines from the perspective of law, police action from the perspective of law, and private partnerships of the police in administrative law in Korea. It emphasizes the function of long term nation guardianship. It recognizes the right of monopoly that a nation has to keep public peace, ensure life and security of its people, and protect property. Thus, from a legal perspective, keeping public security and order makes an argument about the means of power and limited private partnerships of the police. From the nation's perspective, private participation through partnership with police to maintain public peace is not allowed. But as modern society is confronted with the crisis of various dangers, police actin must also take a variety of means and forms to prevent such danger. Police service, during the previous police monopoly, was generally executed by private police. In the changing paradigm of police law, within danger management is a reformed danger prevention. Contribution to police action by the private sector through participation and cooperation is accelerating quickly. This is a global trend, that takes into consideration an increase in public peace demands, a lack of manpower, money, and the mission of the nation. Private partnerships with the police, private security, and the privatization of jail is especially necessary today. Furthermore, various actions, such as informal administrative instruments can contribute to risk prevention. Although private partnerships with the police in public missions is economic, its limits must be examined, as well as if such cooperation is permitted by law. In a complex modern society, public control must be had over the privatization of jails and security, because it is the state that is responsible for danger prevention. Risk management in the 21st Century is an important state mission. Through the aforementioned partnerships, the nation may gain help in promoting rights and interests through danger prevention, and a heightened clarity of foresight. In conclusion, in addition to formal police action, informal actions should be pursued as complementary measures.