본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위드마크 공식의 법적 성질과 적용 범위

A Study on the Nature and Applicable Range of Widmark Equation

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

There are a lot of drunk-driving cases in which the police did not measure the BAC(Blood Alcohol Concentration). In order to punish the drivers or cancel or suspend their driver's licenses, Korean Supreme Court allowed the estimation of BAC by the use of Widmark Equation under the limited situations. Widmark Equation considers several factors such as gender, weight, consumed alcohol amount, and the time of consumption and drive. In 1931, Widmark insisted that there is the following relation between the total amount of alcohol in the organism and that in the blood: a=cpr. By adding the concept of time and other scholars' study to the Equation, it is expressed presently as 'C=a×0.7/(p×r)-b×t'. It is not a complete law, because it does not include drinking speed, consumed food, race and age of the drinker, weather and the other specific conditions which can affect the BAC. Thus, the estimation of BAC via the Equation must be done in favor of the accused. The most important thing in applying the Widmark Equation to the case is that it is available only on and after the BAC climes on the highest peak of the BAC curve. Its relatively irregular course due to random changes in absorption rate and the time for the appearance of diffusional equilibrium give no clear picture of the spread and conversion of alcohol in the organism. Accordingly, if the driver's BAC was not on the highest point when he was driving after drink, the Equation cannot be applied to the driver's case by the back calculation method.

Abstract

There are a lot of drunk-driving cases in which the police did not measure the BAC(Blood Alcohol Concentration). In order to punish the drivers or cancel or suspend their driver's licenses, Korean Supreme Court allowed the estimation of BAC by the use of Widmark Equation under the limited situations. Widmark Equation considers several factors such as gender, weight, consumed alcohol amount, and the time of consumption and drive. In 1931, Widmark insisted that there is the following relation between the total amount of alcohol in the organism and that in the blood: a=cpr. By adding the concept of time and other scholars' study to the Equation, it is expressed presently as 'C=a×0.7/(p×r)-b×t'. It is not a complete law, because it does not include drinking speed, consumed food, race and age of the drinker, weather and the other specific conditions which can affect the BAC. Thus, the estimation of BAC via the Equation must be done in favor of the accused. The most important thing in applying the Widmark Equation to the case is that it is available only on and after the BAC climes on the highest peak of the BAC curve. Its relatively irregular course due to random changes in absorption rate and the time for the appearance of diffusional equilibrium give no clear picture of the spread and conversion of alcohol in the organism. Accordingly, if the driver's BAC was not on the highest point when he was driving after drink, the Equation cannot be applied to the driver's case by the back calculation method.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김남현, "음주운전에 관한 형사법적 연구-음주운전죄 및 음주측정불응죄를 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2006
  2. 김남현, "위드마크 공식에 의한 주취운전죄 입증에 관한 연구 - 체내알코올농도 추정 영향요인에 관한 문제점을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 8(1), pp.1~38 (2008), 경찰대학
  3. 김대휘, "統計資料와 法院에 顯著한 事實 -事實的 規範으로서의 經驗則-", 법조, 46(11) (1997)
  4. 김상호, "음주운전행위와 그 대책", 동아법학, (22) (1997)
  5. 김우진, "음주운전에 있어서 혈중알코올농도와 위드마크 공식", 형사판례연구, (11) (2003), 박영사
  6. 김현석, "음주운전에 관한 문제, 사법연수생논문집(20기)" (1991)
  7. 박기주, "위드마크 공식을 적용하여 혈중알코올 농도를 계산할 수 있는 경우, 대법원판례해설 37호(2001 상반기)", ~ (2001)
  8. 변현철, "음주운전 및 음주측정불응죄, 사법연수원 논문집 제3집" (2006), 사법연수원
  9. 신동운, "형사소송법" (2007), 법문사
  10. 신동운, "판례분석 신형사소송법" (2007), 법문사
  11. 심규홍, "음주운전 처벌의 실무상 제반 문제점 : 음주측정을 중심으로, 재판실무 3집" (2005), 창원지방법원
  12. 이순철, "음주운전에 관한 단속 및 사법처리방안 연구" (1994), 도로교통안전협회
  13. 이원영, "음주조건에 따른 혈중알코올 농도와 혈액 호흡 분배 비율 , 16면", 박사, pp.2007
  14. 이윤제, "음주운전의 혈중알콜농도 산정에 관한 몇가지 문제점-호흡측정치와 혈액감 정치가 상이한 경우를 중심으로-, 검찰", ~ (2002)
  15. 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2007), 박영사
  16. 정성학, "음주운전시 혈중알콜농도 消去率에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
  17. 정용인, "사실오인과 경험칙, 재판자료 22집" (1984)
  18. 최인섭, "음주운전의 규제에 관한 연구" (1996), 한국형사정책연구원
  19. 한영수, "혈중알코올농도를 추산하는 경험법칙(위드마크 공식)의 사용에 관하여, 형사재판의 연구Ⅱ", ~ (2004)
  20. 한창호, "위드마크 공식에 의한 주취정도의 인정에 관하여 in: 형사재판의 제문제(3권)" (2000)
  21. 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" (2008), 박영사
  22. Widmark, "Principles and Applications of Medicolegal Alcohol Determination", pp.1981, R. C. Baselt
  23. 법무연수원, "검사전문연수교재 신임검사반(전반기)", ~ (2005)
  24. 서울중앙지방검찰청, "교통사범 수사실무", ~ (2007)
  25. 경찰청, "교통사고조사·단속관련 질의회시집", ~ (2000)
  26. "대검찰청 1999. 9. 4. 형사61110-4512 법원의 위드마크공식 부정 판결 관련 유의사항 시달", ~ (1999)
  27. 수원지방검찰청, "수원지방검찰청 1999. 12. 20. 형이61110-306 음주운전 수사시 위드마크 공식 계산 적용시 유의사항 시달", ~ (1999)
  28. 경찰청, "경찰청 1998. 12. 4. 교안 63320-2489 위드마크 공식 적용에 대한 회시", ~ (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)