본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韩国少数股东强制挤出制度及其对中国的借鉴 - 兼论中国《证券法》(修订草案) 第122条 -

Research on the Squeeze-Out System of South Korean Commercial Law and Its Implications to Chinese Legislation:Also on the Article 122 of Securities Law(Draft) of China

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

为了给收购人提供完全收购的途径、以及使公司削减经营成本、提高经营效率,现代公司法普遍认可了少数股东强制挤出制度。为了平衡控股股东和少数股东的双方利益,该制度由控股股东的股份强制购买请求权(squeeze-out right)和少数股东的股份回购请求权(sell-out right)构成。 2011年,韩国通过考察德国、英国、美国等相关立法例,在商法中引入了控股股东可以强制取得全部少数股份的制度。中国对少数股东的强制挤出还没有具体立法,只是在《证券法》第97条中规定,收购期限届满后,被收购公司终止上市时,少数股东可以向收购人行使回购请求权。该规定类似于少数股东的股份回购请求权,但是并没有赋予控股股东强制购买请求权。观察近几年的相关立法动向,可以看出中国即将引入少数股东强制挤出制度。2014年证监会的《关于改革完善并严格实施上市公司退市制度的若干意见》中已经主张在公司主动退市中引入该制度,并且在2015年《证券法》(修订草案)中已经具体设立了相关条文,但条文的规定过于简单,而且“非关联股东”等部分概念尚未作出清晰的界定,可能存在司法适用上的困难。另外,从少数股东强制挤出制度的制度价值来看,该制度并不一定适用于上市公司收购,积累一定的立法经验和司法实践后,可以通过修改《公司法》全面引入该制度。本文将对中国《证券法》(修订草案)的相关规定作出评价,并为今后中国《公司法》中全面引入该制度提出立法建议。

Abstract

Modern corporation laws generally approve the squeeze-out system of minority shareholders in order to grant the buyers the whole acquisition pathways, cut operating cost, and improve operating efficiency. In response to both the interests of controlling and minority shareholders, the system includes squeeze-out right of controlling shareholders and sell-out right of minority shareholders. After studying relevant legislations of Germany, England and America, South Korea stipulated the squeeze-out system in its commercial law in 2011. However, China has not regulated the overall system. In its Securities Law(2014 Amendment) the Article 97 says “Upon the expiration of a term for acquisition, where the share distribution of a target company fails to meet the requirements of listing, ……, the shareholders that still hold the shares of the target company have the right to sell their shares in light of the equal terms as stipulated in the relevant tender offer.”, which seems quite not thorough. This stipulation is very similar to the minority shareholders’ squeeze-out right, yet it didn’t grant controlling shareholders the sell-out right. Observing recent years’ legislative trend, we can see that China may import squeeze-out system in the coming years. In 2014, in one of CSRC’s formal exposure drafts the commission already proposed that the system should be integrated in the articles which regulate listed company’s active delisting. Some articles in Securities Law(2015 Draft) of China also proposed the system’s ideology, yet those articles are too humble and some concepts including the concept of Non-Affiliated Shareholders are not quite clear, which subsequently may lead to difficulties in judicial application. Besides, seen from the perspective of its values, the squeeze-out system may not be necessarily applicable to the acquisition of listed company. Nevertheless, after the emergence of legislative and judicial experience, the Company Law of China can fully stipulate the system in its regulation. The research studies and comments on Securities Law(2015 Draft), and gives advice on a full import of squeeze-out system in the Company Law of China.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 施天涛, "公司法论" (2014), 法律出版社
  2. 王东光, "股东退出法律制度研究" (2010), 北京大学出版社
  3. 张佳庆, "余股强制基础制度研究", 硕士, pp.2017
  4. 董新义, "收购人余股强制挤出权的保障及制衡——以《证券法(修订草案)》第122条为对象", 证券法苑, 12 (2017)
  5. 方重, "构建余股强制挤出机制", 中国金融, 9 (2015)
  6. 戚枝淬, "股东强制性退出公司法律机制研究", 安徽工业大学学报, 2 (2014)
  7. 王东光, "上市公司收购中收购方的强制排除权", 证券市场导报, 9 (2009)
  8. 张善斌, "论强制取得少数股东股份-简易式兼并探析", 法学评论 (2002)
  9. 赵万一, "美国法上的排挤式公司合并及对我国的借鉴意义", 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 7 (2005)
  10. 金聖虎, "미국 회사법상 "소수주주 축출의 정당성"에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.297~316 (2007), 한국기업법학회
  11. 김홍식, "개정상법상 소수주식의 강제매수제도에 관한 연구", 안암법학, (36), pp.741~767 (2011), 안암법학회
  12. 김화진, "소수주식의 강제매수제도", 서울대학교 법학, 50(1), pp.321~350 (2009), 법학연구소
  13. 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.231~271 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  14. 서완석, "상법상의 소수주주 축출제도 -소수주식 강제매수제도와 교부금 합병제도를 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.385~443 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  15. 송종준, "소수주식 전부취득제의 입법의도와 해석방향", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.79~106 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  16. 이동건, "상법상 소수주주 축출 방안과 관련한 법률상·실무상 쟁점- 지배주주의 매도청구권, 교부금합병, 주식병합을 중심으로 -", 법조, 61(9), pp.245~290 (2012), 법조협회
  17. 정병덕, "주식강제매수제도와 소수주주의 보호", 상사판례연구, 25(1), pp.77~111 (2012), 한국상사판례학회
  18. 정준우, "지배주주의 주식매도청구권에 관한입법론적 재검토", 법과정책연구, 12(2), pp.483~517 (2012), 한국법정책학회
  19. 주기종, "지배주주에 의한 소수주식의 전부취득에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (58), pp.205~230 (2015), 한국법학회
  20. 최민용, "지배주주의 주식매도청구권의 운용과 관련된 몇 가지 제언", 경영법률, 21(4), pp.361~389 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
  21. 최준선, "2011 개정상법 회사편 해설" (2011), 한국상장회사협의회
  22. 최준선, "기업구조조정 수단으로서의 소수주주의 축출과 소수주주의 보호문제", 법조, 62(1), pp.44~76 (2013), 법조협회
  23. 황현영, "주식회사법대계(Ⅲ)" (2013), 법문사
  24. 황현영, "상법상 강제매수제도에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과 상법전공, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)