개정상법상 소수주식의 강제매수제도에 관한 연구
A Study on the Right of Squeeze-out & Right of Sell-out under New Commercial Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
New Commercial Code that will be effective after April 15, 2012 introduce many sort of new system. Among them the right of squeeze- out & right of sell-out are included for the first time in Korean legislative system. The right of squeeze-out is defined as a right that can purchase remaining shareholder's stock of target company(In case of this, remaining shareholder of target company could be called as minority shareholder) in which acquiring company purchase stock of target company up to 95% (Then acquiring company is called as controlling shareholder). Minority shareholders of the target company must sell their stock to controlling shareholder. Also the right of sell-out is defined as a right that can ask to purchase their stock to controlling shareholder. Controlling shareholder should purchase stock of minority shareholder. Because the right of squeeze-out can freeze out a lot of minority shareholder, it will be needed to approach more carefully. Before new commercial code is codified, there was no way to squeeze- out of minority shareholder of target company. Under the new commercial code minority shareholders can be squeezed out against their will in the case of using right of squeeze-out. Even though frequency of utilizing right of squeeze-out is little bit low in Korea until now, there is sure of possibility to apply right of squeeze-out in the field of Merger and Acquisition Area. I address here problems related with using right of squeeze-out in M&A market. Also I studied in detail fairness of right of squeeze-out's process and price that would be given to minority shareholders. New commercial code could give basic assistance to company to apply right of squeeze-out. But there is no detailed provisions to support right of squeeze-out such as concept of fairness, fair price for minority shareholder's stock. Legislative supplement will be needed in this matter.
Abstract
New Commercial Code that will be effective after April 15, 2012 introduce many sort of new system. Among them the right of squeeze- out & right of sell-out are included for the first time in Korean legislative system. The right of squeeze-out is defined as a right that can purchase remaining shareholder's stock of target company(In case of this, remaining shareholder of target company could be called as minority shareholder) in which acquiring company purchase stock of target company up to 95% (Then acquiring company is called as controlling shareholder). Minority shareholders of the target company must sell their stock to controlling shareholder. Also the right of sell-out is defined as a right that can ask to purchase their stock to controlling shareholder. Controlling shareholder should purchase stock of minority shareholder. Because the right of squeeze-out can freeze out a lot of minority shareholder, it will be needed to approach more carefully. Before new commercial code is codified, there was no way to squeeze- out of minority shareholder of target company. Under the new commercial code minority shareholders can be squeezed out against their will in the case of using right of squeeze-out. Even though frequency of utilizing right of squeeze-out is little bit low in Korea until now, there is sure of possibility to apply right of squeeze-out in the field of Merger and Acquisition Area. I address here problems related with using right of squeeze-out in M&A market. Also I studied in detail fairness of right of squeeze-out's process and price that would be given to minority shareholders. New commercial code could give basic assistance to company to apply right of squeeze-out. But there is no detailed provisions to support right of squeeze-out such as concept of fairness, fair price for minority shareholder's stock. Legislative supplement will be needed in this matter.
참고문헌 (23)
- James D. Cox, "Corporations 2nd Ed" (2003), New York : Aspen
- Robert Clark, "Corporate Law" (1986), New York : Aspen
- Barry M. Wertheimer, "The Shareholder's Appraisal Remady and How Court Determine Fair Value", Duke L. J, 47, pp.613~ (1998)
- Brett A. Margolin, "The Economics of Delaware Fair Value", Del. J.Corp. L, 30, pp.413~ (2005)
- Clark W. Furlow, "Back to Basics : Harmonizing Delaware's Law Governing Going Private Transactions", Akron L. Rev, 40, pp.85~ (2007)
- Faith Steveman, "Going Private at the Intersection of the Market and the Law", Bus. Law, 62, pp.775~ (2007)
- John C. Coates Ⅳ, "‘Fair Value' as an Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law : Minority Discounts in Conflict Transaction", U. Pa. L. Rev, 147, pp.1251~ (1999)
- Lawrence A. Hamermesh, "The Fair Value of Cornfields in Delaware Appraisal Law", J. Corp. L, 31, pp.119~ (2005)
- Michael J. McGuinness, "Going Private Transactions : A Practitioner's Guide", Del. J. Corp. L, 30, pp.437~ (2005)
- 김홍식, "M&A 개론" (2009), 博英社
- 김홍식, "개정상법상 현금지급합병제도에 관한 연구", 경영법률, 21(4), pp.249~283 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
- 임재연, "증권거래법(개정판)" (2002), 서울 : 박영사
- 김동민, "會社分割에 있어서 分割反對株主의 株式買受請求權에 관한 小考", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.410~438 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김진욱, "주식매수청구권제도 개선의 필요성 - 자본시장법상의 주식매수청구권 특례조항을 중심으로", 기업법연구, 24(3), pp.161~192 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 김성호, "독일 주식법상의 소수주주축출제도와 그 시사점", 상사법연구, 24(3), pp.83~112 (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 金聖虎, "미국 회사법상 "소수주주 축출의 정당성"에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.297~316 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김화진, "소수주식의 강제매수제도", 서울대학교 법학, 50(1), pp.321~350 (2009), 법학연구소
- 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.231~271 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 魯赫俊, "合倂으로 인한 株式買受請求時의 價格決定", 민사판례연구, (30), pp.607~638 (2008), 민사판례연구회
- 송종준, "소수주주 강제퇴출법제의 국제적 신조류와 그 입법론적 수용 가능성 -미국,영국,독일법의 비교분석을 중심으로", 증권법연구, 6(1), pp.1~38 (2005), 한국증권법학회
- 전현정, "비상장주식의 매수가액 결정기준", 대법원판례해설, (63) (2006), 법원도서관
- 주기종, "주식매수청구권에 관한 소고", 법학논집, 31(2) (2009), 청주대학교 법학연구소
- 최병규, "독일의 Sqeeze-Out제도에 관한 연구", 한독법학, 14 (2003), 한독법률학회
